• @[email protected]OPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 years ago

    Somehow I managed to only see one of these films once during my archaeology master’s lmao.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 years ago

    If we conqured you that nears you’re par of our country now so it’s technically still in its country of origin right?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 years ago

    Westerners will say “but those relics are safer with us, since your country is fucked” without a hint of self awareness about who fucked up these countries to begin with. And regardless of the situation in those countries, it is THEIR decision where their relics get to be kept safe, not the decision of the people who stole it.

    • downpunxx
      link
      fedilink
      21
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The Taliban ISIS felt the same, then they blew up the Buddhas in Afghanistan, and destroyed countless other artifacts in Iraq

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        Uh, no. The Taliban ordered the destruction of the Buddhas of Bamiyan, not Daesh / IS.

        Daesh destroys relics, but the Buddhas were destroyed in 2001, before Daesh was even a part of Al Qaeda.

        • SokathHisEyesOpen
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          It’s irrelevant at this point, for this topic. If leaving it means it’ll be destroyed by whomever is in power at the moment, then leaving it is a bad idea until it’s stabilized.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Countries can and do ask the museums currently caring for them to continue to do so if they’re unable to provide adequate care for the artifacts themselves for whatever reason. Yemen and the Metropolitan Museum of Art came to an agreement over looted artifacts just a couple of weeks ago with Yemen maintaining ownership of the artifacts, but on display at the Met. It’s still important for countries to maintain ownership of culturally significant artifacts that have been looted.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        No invasion of Iraq, no Isis. Again, we’re back to what I mentioned, in the end it’s not up to you, the thief nation that stole it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          82 years ago

          I’m not from the nation that stole it nor from the nation that created it but Iď love for the ancient artefacts to continue existing. I feel like they’re not just a heritage of one nation, they’re human heritage. The Taliban didn’t create any of the artefacts they destroyed. They have no right to destroy such things just because they live at the same place as the creators. I’m sure the ancient creators would be furious if they new.

    • Tankiedesantski [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      If not, what series of historical events led to this country being so impoverished that it can’t even afford a museum to its own history?

      thinkin-lenin