• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    72 years ago

    On all the shorts etc showing sanction life in Russia, not one has mentioned burger King is still there.

  • krolden
    link
    fedilink
    552 years ago

    Who the fuck cares who is still open in Russia. Theres plenty of companiess still open in Israel where’s the outrage over that?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    322 years ago

    Don’t like it, don’t go there. Tell them why.

    Personally I’m boycotting them. Not because of any moral justification, but because they sell overpriced disappointing mulch.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      122 years ago

      Literally worst fast food joint and the only people I’ve met who claim otherwise have objectively bad taste.

      Like no joke, objectively, “I love a butter and cheese sandwich on wonderbread”, British, wouldn’t know flavor if it ripped their tongue out.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        I sent my sister a bottle of fry sauce that she’s been trying to find for years (she never thought to check Amazon lol), this is what she sends me back. Told her she was supposed to use it to enhance good food, not make terrible food tolerable. not Mmmm

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        I have to make my own burgers now. Most places serve fast food swill, and the only nice place has switched to brioche buns.

        Brioche buns are not load bearing buns! They fall apart at the slightest contact with moisture. I will die on this hill forever.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          52 years ago

          Surely most untoasted buns will fall apart if dealing with anything outside of a basic burger?

          If you use a small, cheap bun, you can’t expect toppings to not break it apart.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            As opposed to dying in a valley forever, totally painless.

            I’m curious about dying on a hill temporarily though.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        You rank BK as worse than McDonald’s? I only ask cause I’ve worked at both, and I would put McDonald’s just the tiniest bit lower than BK. Wendy’s is barely better than both BK and McDonald’s.

          • MrScottyTay
            link
            fedilink
            English
            72 years ago

            Back when i used to have fast food, I liked BK over McD because i preferred their fries and i liked their jalapeño poppers.

              • MrScottyTay
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                McD fries are too soft and when they get cold they are absolute garbage. They almost seem soggy, without getting wet. BK have a crunch to them. At least this is the case in the UK.

              • JokeDeity
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                Not going to say they’re good, but it is wild as fuck how much of a difference franchises can make. There are several BKs in my city, but a select few are owned by a different franchise than the majority of the others. Their food is WAY better, consistently, than the others, and it’s usually a lot fresher tasting.

    • downpunxx
      link
      fedilink
      192 years ago

      when you see right, support that, when you see wrong, fight that. simple.

  • downpunxx
    link
    fedilink
    1292 years ago

    Restaurant Brands International owns Burger King, Tim Hortons, Popeye’s Chicken, and Firehouse Subs

    Fuck RBI, they are lying war profiteers putting tax revenue in the hand of the Kremlin which it uses to fund it’s war of genocide in Ukraine. Do not eat in any of their restaurants

    • Ooops
      link
      fedilink
      11
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Are you also telling us how much they own of those Burger King franchises in Russia they are supposed to shut down?

      • Tarte
        link
        fedilink
        33
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        You don’t own franchise partners by definition. They are individually owned restaurants that pay you a fee to use your brand (name, menu, marketing, etc.).

        „Shutting down“ here means: Don’t renew these franchise contracts. The restaurants will continue to exist, but they will have to rebrand and be less lucrative.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          72 years ago

          but they will have to rebrand and be less lucrative.

          And what do you do if those Russian franchise owners refuse to rebrand and continue using the BK name, supplies and signage?

          Do you stop providing logistical support? Do you cut them off the BK supply chain (shut that down too) and not provide any new menu items / marketing materials?

          Has BK done that?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            332 years ago

            Yes, obviously you should cut supply lines, duh. Why would you supply products to someone who isn’t paying for them.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              So what is burger king doing wrong here?"

              Edit: At least 10 people didn’t read the fucking article, BK did cut the supply line. This place is just like Reddit, all hurr durr without reading the article.

              • Ooops
                link
                fedilink
                52 years ago

                Nothing, because you just hallucinate supply lines. The franchise pays for the fucking name and that’s it. And if they are not allowed to do so anymore, who’s going to Russia and sue the owning oligarchs there?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                232 years ago

                They are telling you, literally. They should revoke the branding licence, cut every supply lines, and sue them if they continue using the brand (as they would surely do if I just started to have a Burger King without a licence). They don’t do these things. Which is wrong. And that’s what they are doing wrong.

                • Ooops
                  link
                  fedilink
                  2
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  What imaginary supply line are you talking about? Do you think that any food there is not supplied locally? That they import paper wrappings with a logo from the US? Actually the ones probably importing their stuff are sitting in the US, even if it’s just plastic trash from China.

                  It’s a name. And if they got told not to use it anymore or they just don’t pay anything anymore… what is supposed to happen? Someone goes to Russia and sues them there?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  42 years ago

                  This is how I know you didn’t read the article.

                  BK did cut the supply chain logistics. It’s mentioned in the article.

                  Sue the franchisees? Where? In Russia? In the middle of an economic war with the west? Even if the suit proceeded for some reason, who do you expect the court to rule in favor of?

                  BK did everything to severe ties. The only thing that remains is to sell their share of the franchise. If they sell now (even if they find a buyer), they likely won’t be paid in anything other than rubles which is useless.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      Especially with firehouse subs having such a purpose washed image/mission, you think they’d be smarter.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      102 years ago

      War profiteer is an interesting way to look at it. If a company doesn’t cut ties with warmonger countries, they are war profiteers ?

      They should also get away from US, Israel, Saudi Arabia, and most of the “developed” countries that are historically exploiting poor countries ?

      They sell fucking burguers, if they manage to not put too much garbage in the food to save money, they are doing enough.

  • SoyViking [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    852 years ago

    They outrage is such a great example of western exceptionalism. The existence of western consumer businesses in the countries of the non-Aryan jungle is supposed to be an immense benefit to these places and their departure must necessarily be disastrous for them. Nowhere is the idea entertained that Russians are perfectly capable of creating their own shitty burger restaurants to replace those if the west.

    • BelieveRevolt [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      692 years ago

      It’s like that 80s news footage of the first McDonald’s opening in Moscow where they’re like so-true ”finally those filthy commies get to enjoy our superior Western treats”

      Then they interview someone who says it wasn’t really worth it to stand in line and pay so much lenin-laugh

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        222 years ago

        Man your historical revisionism is almost endless at hexbear.

        I grew up in a navy/embassy family, so moved around every 3-5 years onto new postings. At an embassy posting in Stockholm, it was common for the attaché-community to pair newly arrived families with someone who had been there for a while. My mum thus got paired with a newly arrived Soviet wife-of-an-attaché to show her the ropes of diplomat life. This lady was on her first posting (it was quite common for Soviet embassy staff to have a LOT of newcomers for fear that they would get to used to western life style and seek asylum) and she was showing this lady where to do shopping in Stockholm. I was joining as I was too small to be left at home on my own.

        So we walk into this supermarket and the Soviet lady sort of walks in, stops for a second, then walks through the one-way gates and stops again. And then she bursts into tears.

        Diplomat life is hard on partners - so tears in the opening days aren’t that uncommon. My mum pulls her to the side and starts saying the usual (“I remember when we started”, “it’ll get better” bla bla) and the Soviet lady says basically “you don’t understand! I’ve never, ever seen so much choice and food and my life”.

        She wasn’t crying because she had left home. She was crying because she was realising how fucked up home was - and remember this is someone who was sent out as a diplomat so reasonably well connected at home.

        The West had a reason for its exceptionalism back then. Compared to many places it still does. In others, of course, we need to wake the fuck up - China is a great example, where there is definitely no cause for a feeling of exceptionalism. Russia, oh boy, yes we can still feel exceptional.

        Go on then, dismiss me with your hexbear memes and be gone.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            42 years ago

            Give me a break. No system is perfect and the discussion isn’t about perfection vs horror. It’s about a series of tradeoffs and the tradeoffs done in the west broadly resulting in better outcomes, on average, for the population there than they did in the Soviet Union. For China nowadays, I’m less certain. Definitely in the big Tier 1 cities, life is on par with Western outcomes, for some better for some worse.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              112 years ago

              I’m just saying, it’s ironic to use that example of a diplomat as opposed to how many people live paycheck to paycheck barely able to make ends meet or are actually homeless, I doubt those people are crying in joy when they walk into a Walmart

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                42 years ago

                I think you’ve missed my point entirely - that could be my fault.

                The example illustrates that even for those well-connected enough in the Soviet Union the sight of a western supermarket was enough to make them weep (this was ‘88).

                I brought this example up to address the false belief that people in Russia weren’t all that impressed with western products (like McDonalds) back when the Soviet Union existed.

                I don’t know how you’re managing to connect that with how people live today and their experience of walking into Walmart.

                Finally, this didn’t take place in Harrods but in ICA in Sweden. Hardly a luxury shop - just an average supermarket.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  32 years ago

                  The idea of communism (extremely simplified) everyone has the means to live and people at “the top” don’t get special privilege on that, obviously almost all actual implementations turn into dictatorships so the point is somewhat moot, however the fact a well connected diplomat in a communist country had to live in the same conditions as other non-well connected people would be a positive, not a negative, they’d see and hopefully be able to improve the lives of everyone as they understand what it’s like.

                  Compare that to a majority of the rich and powerful in America, they’re so ridiculously disconnected from the average experience that they literally do not understand at all what it’s like for those with less.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            Well, if you need to compare a diplomat to a homeless person, then that is a pretty big self own.

        • mojave102
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          And that Soviet lady’s name? Albert Einstein!

          Liberal theory is just bullshit anecdotes on top of bullshit anecdotes.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            Well, there’s no use sitting here arguing about this, is there. I know the truth hurts, so it’s easy to reject.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              32 years ago

              What sort of nonsense response is that? Anyone can poop out any anecdote they like to support their position and say “I know it hurts so it’s easy to reject”.

        • Jack.M
          link
          fedilink
          102 years ago

          This is unironically funny as hell. Great copypasta, I’ll add it to my collection.

    • Maestro
      link
      fedilink
      202 years ago

      You’re missing the point. For BK to operate in Russia means dollars flowing into Russia, because BK needs to buy Rubles. Dollars that Russia needs to buy arms on the international market, because nobody is accepting Rubles.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Except BK is an American company. They wouldn’t operate in Russia if they weren’t making a profit. So their net effect is to have money flowing out of Russia.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        This is true. However, if I owned BK, I’d see this as an amazing business strategy, although a quite unethical one (but as we can see, multi million+ dollar companies aren’t the most ethical either way). I mean, now the literal government has an interest for it to stay in business, they may even start to promote the brand.