Lego, meet Tom Nook.
  • @[email protected]MEnglish
    3•2 years ago

    Heading made me think it was an Animal Crossing like game, by Lego. I was disappointed.

    The set looks great though, would love to get it.

  • Sentient LoomEnglish
    8•2 years ago

    If they didn’t have so much branded bullshit maybe their sets would be affordable.

    Harry Potter and St@r W@rz ruined their Castle and Space sets.

        • citrusfaceEnglish
          14•2 years ago

          What is it like being so confident yet so incredibly wrong?

          • Sentient LoomEnglish
            5•2 years ago

            The pre-HP and pre-SW Lego Castle and Space sets had more pieces and better designs. They were superior and more dynamic sets.

            • sebinspaceEnglish
              1•2 years ago

              “I don’t like the new thing because it’s not the old thing”

            • citrusfaceEnglish
              6•2 years ago

              There are far better sets than there were prior to that. Look at all the massive sets now. Lego ideas. Botanical. Even remakes of old sets, I don’t know what you are on but Lego is better now than ever.

        • @[email protected]English
          1•2 years ago

          How did they ruin the product with Star Wars sets?

          I have non-licensed Lego sets from 1995 that cost $0.24 per brick at the time (inflation adjusted) while currently most comparable sets like City and the like are around $0.10 per brick.

  • @[email protected]English
    17•2 years ago

    Cute.

    So these appear to be actual Lego sets, not a game like Lego Star Wars, Lego Marvel or whatever. I’d love to see a Nintendo-platform Lego Animal Crossing game.

  • @[email protected]English
    12•2 years ago

    I don’t see Cherry. No Cherry, none of my money that simple. Cherry is the best neighbor, and Tiffany is the second best neighbor. I will die on this hill.