the propane industry sees an opportunity to seize a share of the auto sector. Its representatives are working hard to convince public officials to switch to propane-fueled school buses, which they claim are “near-zero emissions” vehicles that are better for kids and the climate.

Except — that’s not true. Propane is still a polluting fuel: While it is refined differently than diesel and natural gas and combusted in uniquely styled engines, it still has a measurable impact on air quality and the climate. If PERC’s deceptive marketing to children, parents, and school administrators is successful, the propane industry threatens to lock in fossil fuels and their polluting emissions for another generation of schoolchildren.

  • KSP Atlas
    link
    fedilink
    112 years ago

    A burning fuel will generally always have combustion byproducts

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I don’t think you need to hedge with “generally”, I’m going to say it always has combustion products, and CO2 is the most benign gas product you can really hope for. In this case you’re burning carbon and hydrogen with oxygen to create carbon dioxide and water, and there really is a limit to how much energy you can extract from each molecule reacted. There’s no way around that, it’s a physical limitation.

      I don’t know what kind of reaction doesn’t have by-products, maybe antimatter annihilation.

      Fusion reactors have helium by-product which can be harvested I guess.

      Point is you need to get pretty exotic and leave the realms of chemistry to get something with “near zero emmissions”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        82 years ago

        The closest thing I can thing of is hydrogen, burning it just makes water, which while still a by-product, is the cleanest and least harmful product of I’m pretty sure any combustion reaction

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          Oh that’s true actually, you could probably call that emissions free in the sense that it really is harmless. I don’t know how I overlooked that tbh.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    My work is trying to engineer a design /plan for electric school busses connected to the grid.

    They are only used for 4-6 hours a day and are stationary the rest. Perfect resource to keep plugged into the grid and help stabilize demand. Our initial study shows they could potentially pay for themselves, but at the very least subsidize their own cost quite significantly.

  • Franzia
    link
    fedilink
    42 years ago

    I hate school busses so much. The town should have a bus system. The whole line up of busses at schools puts pollutants all over kids going home. Every single day.

    • @[email protected]OPM
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Lots of people all going to the same place at the same time makes a dedicated bus route for it useful. The problem is the use of fossil fuels, not the use of a school bus.