I’m sure many of you are already aware that YouTube has been rolling out anti-adblock detection for Chrome users for a few weeks now.

Today, as a long time Firefox user with the fantastic uBlock Origin extension installed, I got my first anti-adblock popup on the platform. Note that this may not happen to you personally for a while, but it is inevitably coming for everyone.

Thankfully, the fine folks at uBlock Origin have already advised a simple workaround (on Reddit, yuck!) which I will duplicate in a simplified form below for your convenience. I have tested it on Firefox and it is working fine for me (so far).

PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW ALL OF THE INSTRUCTIONS IN THIS POST.

  1. Update uBO to the latest version (1.52.0+) . <== The extension itself, for technical improvements. You do this in your browser.

  2. Remove your custom config / reset to defaults. <== This means removing your custom filters (or disabling My filters) and disabling ALL additional lists you’ve enabled. It might be quicker to make a backup of your config and restore to defaults instead.

  3. Force an update of your Filter Lists. <== This is within the extension. Lists are what determine what’s blocked or not. How to update Filter lists: Click 🛡️ uBO’s icon > the ⚙ Dashboard button > the Filter lists pane > the 🕘 Purge all caches button > the 🔃 Update now button.

  4. Disable all other extensions AND your browser’s built-in blockers. <== No need to uninstall, just disable them. They might interfere with our solutions.

Make sure you follow all 4 points above. If you’re seeing the message, it’s likely due to your custom config (either additional lists or separate filters in My filters).

Restarting your browser afterwards may help too.

Once you’ve gotten rid of the issue on default settings, you can slowly start restoring your config (if you really need it). Do it gradually, to easier find out what was causing the issue in the first place. Once you find the culprit, simply skip it in your config.

If you want to use Enhancer for YouTube*, you have to* disable its adblocking*.*

May the force uBlock Origin be with you!

Update

Just wanted to mention a few things that have been pointed out in the comments:

  • There are quite a few projects that provide an alternative ad-free front end to YouTube. These include Invidious, FreeTube, LibreTube, Newpipe, Revanced, and I’m sure there are several more options I’ve missed. I don’t have any particular preference really but I routinely use NewPipe on my cellphone just because I tried it once and couldn’t be bothered trying all the others.
  • In step 4 listed above, to clarify, afaik you only need to remove adblocker extensions (if you have more than one installed) that might conflict with the uBlock Origin rules and trigger the anti-adblock, not all extensions.
  • If you hate non-stop ads but want to support your favorite content creators then be sure to give them some love on Patreon or whatever alternative options they provide. Creators typically make only a tiny, tiny fraction of what YouTube makes in ad revenue, assuming YouTube doesn’t just outright steal the lot, and it’s a shitty business model that’s ruining the internet. Even if you watch the ads, you’re only supporting YouTube most of the time, not the creators.
  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1352 years ago

    Anyone else remember the first ad-pocalypse?

    Like when OG AdBlock was created and there was an all-out race between individual websites and AdBlock?

    Then OG AdBlock sold out and allowed “approved” ads to still show.

    We are seeing history repeat. The only reason ads survived was due to increasing number of users who weren’t using adblock.

    Now, with market saturation, Google is starting to fight back.

    I would absolutely love to see a revitalization on proxy software specifically designed to eliminate ads and tracking. I haven’t looked into this in quite some time but I think we’re crossing into this territory now.

    The pessimist in me says to look out for a bill authored by Google to make adblocking illegal.

    But the optimist in me says “the Internet sees censorship as damage and routes around it.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      The pessimist in me says to look out for a bill authored by Google to make adblocking illegal.

      But the optimist in me says “the Internet sees censorship as damage and routes around it.”

      They’re both right.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      342 years ago

      The current Google approach is adding attestation to Google Chrome. They claim that it is to stop bots, but it can (and will be, they are slow boiling us) also used to block adblockers.

      Anyone who cares about free (as freedom) should stop using chrome and clones and switch to Firefox.

      • Engywook
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        No, thanks. Mozilla is the worst of the open source world. I prefer not to give them market share. Brave works beautifully for me and YouTube may disappear tomorrow and my life wouldn’t change a single bit.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          332 years ago

          Brave the chromium based crypto browser better than Firefox? Mozilla isn’t perfect but you’re off your rocker if you think that is better.

          • Engywook
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Boy, I’ve been a FF user for 20 years before. Don’t try to school me, please. And yes, Brave is actually much better than FF and I enjoy a lot using it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              132 years ago

              You keep saying that you were a proponent of FF back in the day, but the fact that you aren’t giving credence to the experiences that made you switch lessens your credibility and weakens any persuasion power you might have on people switching from FF to Brave.

              It would help your cause to explain what made you switch so others might understand you.

              But from your demeanor, it seems like you dgaf about other people. So I guess that’s fair.

        • Mossy Feathers (She/Her)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          122 years ago

          Brave is based on chromium, which is open-source via Google. Now, I may have this wrong, but my understanding is that the reason why Safari, Chrome, Firefox and Chromium-based browsers are the only browsers still around is because Apple, Google and Mozilla are the only companies with the money to keep up with all the new “standards” and features Google keeps shoving into Chrome. While Chromium may be open-source, if Google pulls the plug then it’ll only be a matter of time before the Chromium browsers run out of steam and can no longer keep up. I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s part of Google’s plan. Keep people in the ecosystem by giving them the illusion that they’re using a different browser while maintaining control over the browser they use and the ability to force them onto a different browser at any time.

          This is all ignoring the fact that Brave is a shitty browser. I can’t remember where I read this, but supposedly Brave collects a lot of data on your usage despite advertising itself as a privacy-conscious browser.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 years ago

      I would absolutely love to see a revitalization on proxy software specifically designed to eliminate ads and tracking.

      You’re in luck because we already have several. Namely Piped and Invidious.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142 years ago

      The pessimist in me says to look out for a bill authored by Google to make adblocking illegal.

      Not a lawyer, but that doesn’t sound legally possible. It’s like turning off the sound when the ads on TV start, you must have the right to consume the data that has been delivered to you however you desire.

    • yukichigai
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      I would absolutely love to see a revitalization on proxy software specifically designed to eliminate ads and tracking. I haven’t looked into this in quite some time but I think we’re crossing into this territory now.

      Privoxy is still being actively worked on. Not sure how well it works for YouTube though. I suppose we may see a flurry of activity on that front if they keep pushing this.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 years ago

      The pessimist in me says to look out for a bill authored by Google to make adblocking illegal.

      “These brave content creators, who produce such culturally significant shows as ‘Ow my balls’ and ‘Matrix 1999 [full rip]’, are being literally murdered by hackers who use adblockers. These pirates use their hacking technology to steal this content and threaten our very way of life. While we regret resorting to legislation, we are left with no choice but to show these thieves the harsh reality of the criminal justice system.”

    • Izzy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      If adblocking becomes illegal I’m done using the internet.

      • nicman24
        link
        fedilink
        142 years ago

        I am going back to irc and telnet bbs

        JavaScript was a mistake

        • DarkenLM
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          Without JS, you wouldn’t have ad blockers and youtube could just bake their ads on the videos themselves while streaming them. Thinking about it, I don’t think it’s off the table for them.

            • DarkenLM
              link
              fedilink
              22 years ago

              In order to delete an element or replace it based on a list, you definitely need JS. You have no other way to access the DOM.

      • Draconic NEO
        link
        fedilink
        English
        452 years ago

        If adblocking becomes illegal people will still do it (and you should too), some really stupid article tried to claim circumventing Anti-Adblock was illegal under DMCA a while back (interestingly they took it down when people continued to block their ads) and the filter providers did it anyway. Piracy still happens in countries where it’s criminalized, ad blocking will continue, though the Quorans (used them as an example because they’re the biggest snobs about the law and ethics) and people like them will likely use it less, though it’s not like they don’t already think it’s wrong (some also think it’s already illegal).

        • Izzy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          To be fair I don’t think it is possible to come up with a legitimate argument for making adblocking illegal. You would have to argue that people aren’t allowed to own anything such as their computers.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 years ago

            The only real argument that could work would be that watching ads to get content is a form of transaction and not watching ads is therefore akin to piracy. However, this exact same argument could be used to ban ALL forms of unsolicited advertising (billboards, junk mail, etc) because under that model, many advertisers are essentially committing theft of your time and attention, which is shown to have some amount of monetary value by the previous transaction argument.

      • azl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        112 years ago

        There will always be a free internet. It just may not be the one currently dominated by corporate datacenters.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    142 years ago

    I wonder if people would consider purchasing YouTube Premium with Turkish Liras ethical. For example - alt account buys YouTube Premium (around 59.99 TRY - 2.16 USD) and can add 4 more people to the family, so each person pays only about 54 cents per month.

    • Thorned_Rose
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I (had) YouTube Premium and despite that I’m now shadowbanned on YouTube for what I can only assume is using Return Dislike, uBlock and/or Enhancer. I’ve never made a single comment that would warrant a ban so I have no other explanation but that Google decided to screw over a paying customer just because I use add ons.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 years ago

    Following step 3 (and only step 3) so far worked for me.

    The popup reappears every now and then, but updating filter lists again always fixed it. Let’s see how it goes longterm.

    • JokeDeity
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      fingers crossed I’ve never had any issues so far, I’m keeping my UBO updated and the lists updated and hoping for the best. I thought people were doing something wrong with I first saw this popping up, but I’m sad Firefox users are actually suffering now too.

  • Keith
    link
    fedilink
    English
    132 years ago

    Concern I’d have if I didn’t use Piped:

    I’m on AdNauseum and not uBO because I like the idea of actively resisting advertising culture and protesting through obfuscation, etc. So might not work for me

    • Draconic NEO
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      I don’t think Adnauseam ever registered clicks on YouTube (correct me if I’m wrong) just blocks the ads.

    • Saik0
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      Adnauseum uses the same ublock engine underneath i believe…no? I is it too… I’ve always thought that this was the case.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        It does, but I’ve noticed they’ve been slower to update in response to countermeasures like these.

        • Draconic NEO
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Don’t they use largely the same filter database from the original?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            I think it’s pretty much the exact same thing, but I’ve noticed they’ve been slower to update in response to countermeasures like these than uBlock Origin.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    962 years ago

    Lol That’s awesome, less of a workaround and more of a “we fixed it already, but whatever you’re using probably hasn’t caught up yet”.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    532 years ago

    That’s way too much hassle. I guess, when the anti-adblock kicks in on my devices, I’ll just stop watching YouTube. I have tons of better stuff to do anyway.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    202 years ago

    All I need from youtube are my handful of subscriptions and my watch later, so I have moved on to invidious. I’d recommend it