• nearhat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    202 years ago

    Flash in the pan. Replacing Twitter won’t happen with Facebook clones.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            Twitter had the most data harvesting with news sites embedding tweets. Can’t do that with an app and no web.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            That is likely a benefit but let’s be honest the real reason is that a web version would require a lot of additional overhead especially to staff enough engineers.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              This makes no sense honestly. Making a captive web app is easier than supporting two apps.

            • Supernovae
              link
              fedilink
              English
              132 years ago

              A web wrapper for the platform would be effectively no effort, especially for a company like Facebook. The difficulties would be losing out on tracking data and dealing with annoyances like adblock

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                32 years ago

                I wouldn’t be surprised if they are working on something now and just wanted to get the app out as an mvp.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 years ago

            And despite that I can’t believe some people are still not highly skeptical of federating with meta as though there isn’t over a decade of privacy infringing business practices. Instead wanting to hear them out after they just went through deleting content from reddit because they didn’t want to provide value to Spez, but they are fine with providing content for meta users to interact with for Zuckerberg?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 years ago

    Expected it. It’s a cheap Twitter clone with the downsides of using Meta social networks. When was new, people wanted to try it, specially since there’s a lot of hate towards Twitter lately.

  • @[email protected]
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    302 years ago

    Reminds me of the old saying: “how do you make a million dollars in the stock market? Start with a billion”

    Start with a billion visitors, then snag 100 million, then keep 1 million then blaghole the site

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 years ago

    This is expected? New service, people flock, it’s not for everyone that flocked, buzz dies down

    I’ll stick with Mastodon in any case

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    432 years ago

    No hashtags, no anonymity…. Threads has no purpose and is likely to fail unless this changes

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 years ago

      no anonymity

      I doubt that Instagram users who willingly install an another app made by Facebook care about that lol

      • MrNemobody
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 years ago

        They want anonymity from relatives/friends. Most people don’t care much about advertisers knowing their interests.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    242 years ago

    Yeah, the novelty of it will fizzle out. Some will call it their new home. Others will go back to Twitter or other. Some will check back in periodically.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 years ago

    And half of movement there is just bots reposting shit from twitter. Indeed great success.

  • redimk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    672 years ago

    I mean, to be honest, I feel like it’s the quality of the content in there. I used my old phone (the one I use for apps like threads) to get a threads account and people are using Threads as if they’re using instagram.

    For example, you see a pocture of someone or a drawing, you get into the post to see the 45 comments people left and all of them are:

    Comment #1: “Magnificent 🥰😍” #2: “Amazing 🤩” #3: “WOW!! 🔥🔥”

    And so on.

    At least in twitter there is more “discussion” (albeit toxic and usually useless) or at least more people sometimes talking about interesting things.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      192 years ago

      I guess it turns out that when you pretty much automatically port over so the Instagram users they treat it like Instagram.

    • dinckel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      312 years ago

      That’s pretty much exactly what I expected. Instagram is exactly like this. Filled to the brim with fake engagement, bots, and an occasional real person account, who also happens to be doing things that horribly affect people’s mental health

    • @[email protected]
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      the only reason it has any users is that it gave some fakeout on insta UI that your friends were talking about you on threads and, as per Meta usual, it was all bullshit. typical zuccing egotism for his upcoming cagematch.

    • Ben Hur Horse Race
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      toxic and useless dont really summarize it imo- last few times I went there the top 10-15 comments were just screaming right wingers yelling about a conspiracy of some sort no matter what the topic is

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Looking in the replies of any new scientific discovery is infuriating, they’re all spouting inane shit about how “science changed its story, so it has no credibility, this is proof that the earth is flat and 6000 years old.”

  • Samantha E Xavia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 years ago

    It was alright I guess the first week, but really the big part that interested me was the Fediverse, and I really do hope people jump off Threads to come use other platforms.

    Some might not and I wish Meta goes by there work and does Fediverise to allow those users to use the wider Fediverse

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    192 years ago

    Probably because it’s a complete mess. I joined as I was curious and don’t really care if I have to delete my Instagram account to get rid of my Threads account. You follow people and then barely see their updates.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      From what I’ve heard about the feel it’s a giant data (=cash) grab. Sorta like how Google+ was a me-too and never took off.

      The massive inrush is like what happens when the new restaurant opens in town. Everyone goes once or twice to check it out but if it sucks it will still fail even if it is super busy the first week.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1182 years ago

    “Last week, the text-based social media platform reported a record 100 million sign-ups in just five days.”

    LOL The biggest bullshit of the year… Meta just created shadow accounts of all Instagram users, without their knowledge or consent…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      152 years ago

      Is there a way to check if a user account exists for my instagram account without logging in?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        I saw this in browser: You can go the person Instagram account and see if they have a thread logo next to it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        people reported already having followers before ever using the platform, meaning all people automatically had an account created for them. that (and many other things) is also very legally problematic in the EU which is why the service isnt available here.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          252 years ago

          It’s not hard to understand what was happening.

          • I follow Person A and Person A follows me on Instagram
          • Person A signs up for Threads before me
          • I sign up for Threads after
          • Because we already follow each other on Instagram, Threads automatically made Person A follow me

          The issue with the EU is you can’t mingle and mix user data from two separate services.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          Sole benefit of Brexit identified. We get to hand over our data to meta before you guys. It’s all been worth it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          82 years ago

          “An account was already created for them” because it’s the same Meta account. You can just follow people when you start your account without them necessarily activating threads.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Wasn’t it announced to be the case? So it’s “just” without consent, which is already bad enough.

      • I Cast Fist
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        Bots generate user engagement! Granted, it’s bad engagement, but it also generates jobs for the moderator AI teams

    • ChrisostomeStrip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Exactly. Everybody checked what is this about, then stopped gave shit and here we are

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      322 years ago

      100 million isn’t that much when it comes to Meta. There’s over 2 billion “active” Instagram users that all were prompted to download the app. That means only 0.005% of Instagram accounts fell for it.

      I have no doubt that at least that many people tried it out. When I went to the Android App store, Meta was paying for a front and center promotion of Threads.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          while you’re correct based on instagram’s numbers, the other commenter would be correct if it was a British billion which is a million millions. just a fun fact 🦄

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            52 years ago

            That’s true, although the long scale billion hasn’t been a thing even in Britain for decades.

            If it’s fun facts you like, try this: English is the clear odd one out, most other languages use milliard for 10^9 and billion for 10^12.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              milliard - love it ty for that. Reminds me of: French: L’ananas Italian: L’ananas Icelandic: Ananas Portuguese: O ananás Swedish: Ananas German: Die Ananas

              English: Pineapple
              
        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          Well, technically… they said “users”, not “people”. Maybe there are 2E12-1E8 bots… 🙃

  • willow <3
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 years ago

    Expected. They haven’t added lots of essential features yet so it doesn’t even have anywhere near feature parity with Twitter, making it more pleasant and useful for people to Twitter.