NY bill would require a criminal history background check for the purchase of a 3D printer::Requires a criminal history background check for the purchase of a three-dimensional printer capable of creating firearms; prohibits sale to a person who would be disqualified on the basis of criminal history from being granted a license to possess a firearm.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 years ago

    Just go into jersey or any surrounding staye and buy the printer and head back to New york

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      Or just buy some steppers, cabling, and 8020. Is NY going to be regulating those too? Are they going to require serialized hotends?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    572 years ago

    Oh, did we start requiring criminal background checks for pipes and metal stock too? This is the same problem we’re facing in the rest of the country, everything can be used as a weapon, and requiring background checks on all of them is gonna do nothing to stop gun crime. Regulate the damn guns, that is the only thing that will help.

    • edric
      link
      fedilink
      English
      262 years ago

      US: We have a gun problem.

      Also, US: We’ve tried everything but regulate guns and we’re all out of ideas!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        Lol, are you insane? I’m not against better controls, but if you think the US is lacking in gun control laws and regulations you are sorely mistaken.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        142 years ago

        No you don’t understand. The pro-gun community would support a solution, it just needs to be instantly and 100% effective without inconveniencing a single gun owner or costing anything.

        It’s a completely reasonable position and not at all just an excuse to do nothing.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          Maybe the answer is that every single human being should own a gun and carry it every single place they go 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            Isn’t it just fascinating how all the solutions proposed by gun owners and Republican politicians just happen to coincide with what’s most profitable for the gun lobby?

            But I’m sure people who manufacture guns are much more moral than the tobacco industry, oil industry, sugar industry, asbestos industry and all those other groups that got caught putting profits before people’s lives.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      182 years ago

      America isn’t the only country in the world with hardware stores yet is still the only country in the world with weekly mass shootings – 80% of which use legally purchased firearms and 0% of which use home made guns.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          “The important thing is that no gun owners were mildly inconvenienced”

          - Thousands of dead school children, executed partners and victims of crime

      • Eddie Trax
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        You’re getting downvoted to shit on most of your comments but just wanted to say you are not wrong.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Except comments where I use a % – those still have a conspicuously positive score. I wonder if someone’s sleazy tools are being thrown off by it?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Oh I’m sorry, they’ve been used in three mass shootings since 2013, which is almost 0.01% of mass shootings in that period. How terribly misleading of my propaganda.

          Practically neck and neck with the 80% that use legally purchased firearms and the 10% that use the legally purchased and poorly secured firearm of a family member.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 years ago

      Yeah, you can make a firearm with a piece of bamboo (this is basically what the first firearms were). To think you can restrict anyone from making a firearm is insane. You literally wouldn’t be allowed to own anything if the capability of it making parts of a firearm is restricted. Drill press, lathe, and just about any tool should be restricted if that’s the requirement.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          92 years ago

          With all the wonderful things 3d printers can do they chose to focus on one thing. Effectively removing rights from people who never got to exercise them.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            122 years ago

            There’s a certain section of Democrats for whom as soon as you say “guns” they turn off their brains and vote for whatever they’re told to.

            Much like “immigrants” or any number of right wing triggers. There’s fewer of them on the left but they work the same way.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          112 years ago

          lol wasn’t the first gun law in America enacted to keep Black Americans from buying or possessing firearms?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 years ago

        It seems pretty clear that this is trying to target the production of switch devices that turn firearms fully automatic

        Then they’re even dumber than I thought, since those can be made with a coat hanger and a set of needle nose pliers.

    • credit crazy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      You see they have the fact that the only places you can get a 3d printer in Vermont is through Amazon as the only places you can get anything remotely techy is at the only Best buy in the state or some auto shop and from my experience I’ve never seen a 3d printer there

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Vermont was used as an example because I remembered it bordered NY, not because it’s the only state in the union where 3D printers are sold.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    422 years ago

    I’m a leftist, I don’t support laws like this cause they don’t actually do anything. Dems fr have been supporting initivies to fork over more and more data.

    • Sippy Cup
      link
      fedilink
      English
      412 years ago

      Here’s a fun fact, hobby machinists have been making guns in their garages for as long as machining has been a career.

      You can, right now, buy a drill press for a few hundred bucks and finish 80% lowers in an apartment if you want. If you have a lot of money to spend you could buy a mini mill and make the job a lot easier.

      These are completely unregulated and arguably much more dangerous.

      Have fun with that knowledge.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        112 years ago

        Hell, you can make a basic pipe shotgun with a $5 hacksaw and some steel pipe. Not only that, but you can pretty convert tons of guns to full auto with basically no effort. Sometimes literally a piece of coat hanger bent with pliers. The Lightning Link, which can convert a majority of modern ARs to full auto has been around for decades and can be made with about $1 worth of steel, a piece of paper with the design printed on it, and that hacksaw you used earlier. Even some guy in his garage could easily make hundreds a year without a single power tool.

        All of this is to say, you know what we don’t see? Millions of illegal full-auto firearms being used to re-enact the minigun scene from Terminator 2. Much to the shock of our government, the vast majority of citizens are law-abiding, and stupid shit like this once again only harms normal people while criminals will just continue to break the law as usual.

        • Sippy Cup
          link
          fedilink
          English
          82 years ago

          There is a decent community of 3d printed firearms, but they’re not printing pressure chambers or barrels. These things can be and frequently are regulated. These guys are printing crazy looking guns for fun. They still have to go buy the important bits and even then they still fail pretty regularly.

          This is some real brain dead legislation

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            62 years ago

            Oh, I’m well aware and I’m part of that community, which is what makes this so hilarious. US gun legislation hasn’t ever really been based on reality, and always amazes me that in a country where guns are such an integral part of its history and culture, we have people who seemingly know less than nothing about anything firearms related effectively making legislation based on something they saw in a movie that one time.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        And I can’t even remember the last time a crime was committed with a made-at-home gun. We’re really going after the people that commit all the violence. 🙄

        It’s such an easy window into the fact that it’s about cutting the access to weapons of the population who might use them to fight back against government action. They dgaf if we murder each other, they just don’t want us murdering them.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          Same principle applies to the frequent attempts to ban semi-auto rifles, when rifles account for 3% or less of all homicides annually.

          Those kind of weapons are effective for defending / attacking a moderate sized area, unlike pistols and bolt-action rifles. Pistols are short range and bolt-action rifles are slow. It’s obviously about the power that they don’t want the people to have.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          I think it’s stupider than that. They have no idea how a handmade gun could be built without a 3d printer. They probably have zero clue what a 3d printer actually can and cannot do, and I’d bet most politicians have never seen one or bothered to understand it before regulating it. Their sole exposure is a few loud people who also do not understand anything about guns or 3d printers, and confuse that lack of understanding with definitive proof that it is evil and should be banned.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    942 years ago

    Are these lawmakers aware of the fact you can 3d print a 3d printer? Or at least, about 80% of its parts, and the remaining parts are indistinguishable from the random stuff youd buy at the hardware store? (Aluminum extrusion mostly, some gears, etc)

    The only part they could theoretically hope to control worth a damn would be the printing nozzles, which are so incredibly cheap to buy bulk and nearly impossible to specialize.

    Also you could take this to court and point out that you would need to also include CNC machines, Laser Cutters, lathes, and any of the other variations of tools that can be used to manufacture a DIY gun.

    This isnt a problem specific to 3d printers, a CNC mill that can cut aluminum is also just as capable of producing the jigs needed to manufacture gun parts.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        202 years ago

        It would, but it would also require more expense and skill and the “gun control is pointless because people will just make their own guns” lie works best when you can imply there is minimal cost, experience, effort and risk.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          since a cnc is computer controlled it should be about as hard to learn to use a 3d printer

          making the model and instructions for the cnc may be more complicated, but you can share those

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            Your gut feelings are not facts. CNC machining – especially of hard metals and complex shapes – is significantly more complicated and expensive than desktop 3D printers.

            You can’t just buy a $200 CNC frame, stick a palm router in it and come back an hour later to an AR-15.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              62 years ago

              Not that you’re saying otherwise, but it’s not anywhere that simple to make a gun on a 3d printer either. It’s at least not considerably easier than making one clandestinely using any of the myriad options that have existed without 3d printing.

            • MrSpArkle
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 years ago

              There are companies that sell small CNC machines marketed for the purpose of producing firearms. At that point all you need is the gcode and the stock.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                Sounds like you shouldn’t have any problem answering these questions then:

                1. What does the machine itself cost?
                2. What grades of metal is the spindle able to cut and what is suitable for a safe and reliable firearm?
                3. What tool heads are needed to manufacture each part of a gun?
                4. For each of those tools, cutting that material, what is a good RPM and feed rate?
                5. Do any parts require precise realignment as part of a tool change or when changing the orientation of a part?
                6. How much stock is required for a semi-automatic rifle and what does it cost?
                7. What have you personally manufactured and on what machines? Regular old mills and lathes are fine.

                Alternatively, you could go on record saying that absolutely none of those things matter for gun manufacturing.

                • MrSpArkle
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  22 years ago

                  All of the answers to these questions are easy, and they all begin with a G.

                  G-code answers most of your technical concerns.

                  Google could have helped you find your other answers.

                  And the Ghost Gunner is what I found:

                  https://ghostgunner.net/product/ghost-gunner-3-deposit/

                  Why so incredulous about something that is obviously possible?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        So the big thing people, including lawmakers, whiff on this is you dont actually 3d print guns. You can 3d print superficial parts like the grip and whatnot, but the actual firing part of the gun is largely not 3d printable.

        You can print it, and people have tried, but it usually only lasts 1-2 rounds before it breaks.

        However, what you can print that is a huge deal, is the very precise jigs necessary to very easily manufacture the firing mechanisms of the gun, to quite a degree of precision. Then you use a drill or whatever to actually make those metal parts.

        Basically, you can easily 3d print a gun maker, and then 3d print all the “extra” parts like grip and whatnot that attach to what you have created, in order to improve it.

        Thats the actually serious part, because normally these sorts of jigs need to be extremely precise and are quite difficult to get ahold of. You need a fairly high end CNC machine to make one, or you have to buy it.

        But 3d printers, even fairly affordable ones, when fine tuned by hand, do have the necessary precision to print such jigs, which makes them much more accessible for quite cheap… And once you print the jig, it becomes pretty easy to mass produce DIY guns.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          This doesn’t track. You can do way better with a manual mill and, as the other poster mentioned, a 2d paper template with some spray glue will do fine in a pinch. Drilling steel will heat the bit up enough to melt plastic anyway. You could set drill bushings but they won’t be perfect and will drift a bit once they heat up.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            The jigs in question are a lot more complicated than I think what you are imagining. If you look up on the topic (and possibly get added to a watchlist), it’s fairly sophisticated equipment being created to handle a lot more of the finesse work required to produce a ghost gun that can actually reliably hit targets its aimed at.

            Thats what separates this sort of work out from your run of the mill DIY handcrafted stuff, the guns in question actually have a lot of accuracy as 3d printed rigs can have very high precision once they have been fine tuned, and unlike stuff like paper they can be produced in 3 dimensions, which means you’re working with a lot more than just following lines.

            Think more like extremely augmented drill presses and routers and shit that can produce a lot of the parts you normally cant make yourself and have to buy.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              I may be underestimating it since I’m a jig builder.

              We’re talking about different things I think.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          And once you print the jig, it becomes pretty easy to mass produce DIY guns.

          Sure, but you still need to buy the actual firing mechanism parts of real guns in order to manufacture “3d printed guns”.

          And you can also make those same jigs and fixtures out of wood or any other raw material.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            but you still need to buy the actual firing mechanism parts of real guns in order to manufacture

            Nah thats the parts the jigs make, as well as a couple other key pieces that require higher than usual precision. At least, if you want to actually make a gun that can reasonably hit a target.

            And you can also make those same jigs and fixtures out of wood or any other raw material.

            Not by hand with the precision needed, not for the parts in question. Unless you want to risk a misfire and losing a finger.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          People have been making paper templates for a long time, I can’t see how plastic would have any real advantage. A plastic guide isn’t going to constrain a metal cutting tool, at best it just shows you where you need to drill the same as a paper template. If you wander outside the lines you’ll just mess up both the part and the jig.

          If I were to set up a clandestine gun manufacurer I would try and design a product that could be made using mostly aluminum extrutions and paper jigs. That way it’s easy to compartmentalize each step, harder for one guy to flip on you, and fast/cheap. Plus if you get raided you don’t have a bunch of incriminating files cached on your CNC machine from previous runs.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            A plastic guide isn’t going to constrain a metal cutting tool,

            It’s a lot more complicated than that. We are talking a lot more than just “guides” when it comes to these types of jigs. Adapters and entire jigs that require a bunch of common parts you can by at the hardware store + the plastic parts to assemble.

            Think more like creating bespoke fairly precise CNC stuff to adapt a drill or router. It’s a lot more advanced than just paper guides, because 3d printers are for all intents and purposes CNC machines themselves.

  • The Pantser
    link
    fedilink
    English
    542 years ago

    Can anyone name one crime that has been committed with a 3d printed gun from the last 3 years that hasn’t been committed 100x more often in the last week with a stolen or illegally obtained gun.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      322 years ago

      Or by legal gun owners, who are responsible for a massive percentage of gun violence, (for example, 80% of all mass shootings).

      You know, the same legal gun owners who let their guns get stolen or staunchly oppose closing gun show loopholes or making straw-purchasing more difficult.

      • @[email protected]
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        152 years ago

        I agree with all of your points but have a small nitpick that I really wish people would stop calling it the gun show loophole

        The loophole is that private sales (depending on state laws) don’t require a background check (which, to be clear, I disagree with)

        But all of those guys with tables set up at the gun show are FFL dealers, buying from them is just like buying from any regular gun shop with all of the normal background checks and other requirements you’d expect in your state.

        Now any of the random folks wandering around the show, in theory, could sell you a gun without any background check, but that’s not unique to them being at a gun show, they could do the same from their garage, a Walmart parking lot, a random street corner, a TGI Fridays, etc.

        I’m also pretty sure that most, if not all gun shows specifically prohibit those private sales from happening at their events.

        Again, I’d like to see the loophole closed, but calling it a gun show loophole just leaves the door open for gun nuts to say “lol, there is no gun show loophole, see you don’t even know what you’re talking about” because there’s really nothing unique about gun shows as it pertains to the law.

        Instead i’d say we should refer to it as the private sale loophole or the Brady bill loophole.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          That’s all fair, but it remains the most widely accepted term for the issue, complete with its own Wikipedia page.

          leaves the door open for gun nuts to say “lol, there is no gun show loophole, see you don’t even know what you’re talking about”

          It doesn’t matter what it’s called, they’ll continue to oppose addressing it because their strategy is to only take, never give.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 years ago

            Call it a “private sales loophole”. It’s more accurate, and covers what you would actually want covered.

            A big issue with gun control, outside of the NRA being a huge grift, is that gun control advocates have no idea how guns work and what current laws actually do. They often confuse things that are truly dangerous with purely cosmetic features.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              Well even the most profoundly stupid person can see the most important thing American gun laws do; fail on a daily basis.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  02 years ago

                  Hey if you want us to ban things that actually help, I’m all for it. Should we start with semi-automatic weapons or handguns?

          • @[email protected]
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            It doesn’t matter what it’s called, they’ll continue to oppose addressing it

            That doesn’t mean we need to make it easy for them to oppose it. Don’t give them a stupid way to dismiss the conversation before it even gets off the ground, make them actually defend their position that private sales shouldnt need background checks.

            IMO, getting stuck calling it the gun show loophole when there are better things to call it because that’s what everyone has always called it has the same kind of energy as conservative assholes who refuse to learn a person’s pronouns or old people who never bothered to scrub things like “colored” or “oriental” from their vocabulary. Language can, does, and should change with the times, and we need to keep up with it.

              • @[email protected]
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                English
                32 years ago

                Them getting caught up on you calling it the gun show loophole is bikeshedding, and you can solve it by the simple action of calling it something else.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 years ago

                  Again, there is no possible combination of words that will make the pro-gun community support its closure and you’re doing them a massive favor by implying they have a role in the conversation at all.

                  With Google searches for “private sale loophole” returning results for “gun show loophole” (as well as information about the origin of the term), it could just as easily be argued that you’re muddying the waters for semantics.

                  So I’ll just keep using whatever phrase gets my point across and you can use whatever words you want in the gun-control comments you don’t seem to be making, to placate people who don’t seem to exist, so they don’t use a talking point that’s trivial to address.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          82 years ago

          The loophole thing really turned into a talking point, didn’t it? Whenever someone uses that word, I automatically assume they’ve never been to a gun show.

          • @[email protected]
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            I tend to make the same assumption, not that I think it’s important for people saying these things and crafting these laws to have ever been to a gun show, but they should at least understand what it is they want to regulate.

            I am by no means anti gun, I like guns, enjoy shooting, I don’t currently own any because I have other priorities for my money, but if I suddenly found myself with a lot more disposable income I’d probably own a couple. That said, I do support a lot of gun control measures that would make the average Republican voter call me a crazy gun grabbing communist.

            Mostly though, I hate seeing people pushing for laws and regulations when they clearly don’t understand what it is they’re trying to regulate. You see a lot of liberals get up in arms (and rightfully so) about shitty Internet laws crafted by geriatric politicians who can barely manage to check their own emails, but then go and make the same kind of mistakes with gun laws

            To name one particularly egregious example, McCarthy describing a barrel shroud as “a shoulder thing that goes up” had similar energy no Stevens describing the internet as “a series of tubes” except the tubes analogy could actually kind of work for some internet issues (though not the specific one he was complaining about) whereas I can’t think of any way to twist the shoulder thing comment to make it apply to a barrel shroud.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          I know you’re trying to say “the people killed by domestic terrorists in America are statistically insignificant” but awkwardly shoehorning it in like that just makes it sound like you don’t understand percentages.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    lmao could you even make a usable firearm with a 3D printer?

    Even if you used the best quality material, it would probably explode on the first shot making its aim useless and probably a danger to the user.

    Also why not do a background check for idk maybe the gunpowder lol.