• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    Does anyone need more reasons to never invest in crypto? Honestly, investing in stocks has similar issues, but it’s a lot more regulated. Still… Ultra wealthy people manipulate the market every few minutes.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 years ago

    Power corrupts, money corrupts, water is wet.

    What did we expect from volunteer power positions with crypto?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    502 years ago

    So does this count as some kind of fraud or insider trading that can be prosecuted by, say, the SEC or CFTC?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      232 years ago

      Sure does! But nothing will happen, you’re essentially a 100% safe running pump and dump schemes as long as you only rip off poor people.

      Check out Coffeezilla’s yt channel, there’s loads of obvious fraudsters out there, nothing ever happens to them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      Wasn’t this information public for days before the dump? I don’t think this can be considered anything illegal if that’s the case, everyone had the same information available. Mods don’t get some sort of special insider preview of most things like this.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        When clicking on the article, the line under the title says: “Analysis suggests at least three Reddit moderators dumped thousands of dollars worth of Moons just minutes before the actual announcement.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        192 years ago

        The majority of communities I followed on Reddit did not live to Lemmy, or they did and got abandoned in a couple weeks. None of the sports or gaming communities I followed are here/alive here.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            52 years ago

            Not the main communities, but the smaller ones. I’ve had to resort to Facebook for getting information and news about teams I follow, and for new indie games that get released the only communities I can find are on Reddit.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      392 years ago

      Reddit introduced a crypto as a way to monetize Reddit gold so users would get paid for posting. They abruptly cancelled the program after people had already bought into it but it looks like some insiders at Reddit got the news first- they sold their shares before they announced the cancellation. Basically Reddit committed investment fraud.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        I’m not sure this is correct.

        The community tokens crypto has been around since 2020. I think that’s separate from the new gold monetization scheme.

        • Teppic
          link
          fedilink
          92 years ago

          I don’t really use Reddit anymore, but my understanding was some subreddits had crypto coins, but Reddit withdrew gold and formally started supporting these crypto tokens instead after the API exodus had happened.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            That is what I remember as well. After the API change, they did this whole crypto-instead-of-gold announcement.

            Are they back to their traditional gold now?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        112 years ago

        It definitely sounds like some sort of insider trading thing.

        It’s not a registered security, and reddit isn’t public… but if this is true it must have broken some sort of rule.

  • ThatOneKirbyMain2568
    link
    fedilink
    132
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    What’s this? You’re telling me that crypto based on Reddit blockchain points—points from a company that’s constantly making rash decisions and removing large features—didn’t end well? And people with inside info were able to get out before this concept failed?

    Man, if only someone could’ve seen this coming….

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      252 years ago

      Reminds of that article about where crypto was speed running through the history of how all The securities rules got written in the first place. This is, of course, insider trading.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      572 years ago

      Spez and the whole Reddit company culture seem to be very in touch with the whole crypto scam industry. I wouldn’t be surprised if Reddit admins moderate the crypto sub part time and they got in on this.

      • partial_accumen
        link
        fedilink
        282 years ago

        I get the feeling Spez and other Reddit execs tried for years to make money out of reddit seeing only modest returns, then crypto comes on the scene and with conversations on Reddit being a large part of the success. Crypto grifters get in, pump, dump and cash out rich. Spez and other Reddit execs are looking at each other shocked saying “WTF just happened!? A bunch of folks just used the platform we built to get rich and we’re still not! How can we do the same thing they did?”

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍
    link
    fedilink
    English
    190
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Next time reddit will cut out the middleman and just sell rugs.

    The “fuck spez” rug will be the best seller. When it inevitably gets pulled out from under each buyer they’ll act all shocked, say “better not do that again, spez” and then go right back to standing on it because their friends are all standing on theirs too.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    682 years ago

    Doesn’t this constitute insider trading? Sincerely hope some redditor takes them to court.

    • Neato
      link
      fedilink
      302 years ago

      Do insider trading and market manipulation laws apply to crypto, an unregulated speculative asset? This isn’t rhetorical, I’ve no idea.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        I am also curious. On the one hand, if you tax any gains from it you should also make sure it operates within some legal framework. On the other hand, would anybody investigate a magic bean salesman for insider trading? Would they rather charge them with scamming?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Edit: I just realized your comment wasn’t directed at the IRS specifically. I’ll leave my comment up because I still find the info interesting.

          I think the IRS tries to be agnostic to the legality of income. Yes, taxes are set in accordance with law, but their role isn’t make sure you obtained your income legally or ethically… not that I would trust them not to “tattle”.

          Here is an overview on the IRS’s guidance for reporting illegal income:

          https://taxfoundation.org/blog/irs-guidance-thieves-drug-dealers-and-corrupt-officials/

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          142 years ago

          Yup. Anyone who received this non-public information and then traded based on that information is guilty of insider trading. I would also think that reddit has some liability here, as they shared this information to non-employees.

  • @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Apologies for the crypto website as the article source- it summarized things well and was written by someone who knows a lot about the subject. That being said, if you’re going to invest, invest in something real and tangible.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It’s a cult too. It feeds on hype and marketing so people will say anything to keep the value of their worthless investments up. That’s probably why you’re getting a couple downvotes even though you’re 100% right. Wouldn’t be surprised if some coins got big from bot network spamming.

      Edit: they won’t even argue about it, they just keep downvoting. Proves my point exactly.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        222 years ago

        Crypto is used to scam, it doesn’t mean the technology or the idea is a scam. I find it really ironic how Lemmy seems to hate it so much. I don’t have any investment in it anymore because I don’t like how profit-focused it became but I first got into it for the same reason I’m here on Lemmy, Bitcoin was an open source and federated alternative to money. Anyone could run a node and mine it. No more proprietary apps like PayPal.

        While I don’t think we will ever recapture the original spirit the tech had in the early 2010s I do find it quite sad that people think crypto = scam. Is HTTP a scam because scam websites exist? Are phones a scam because scam calls exist? I really wish people would separate the underlying technology (which is actually really cool) and the people using it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It’s, by design, a deflationary asset. There’s a limited amount of it, the difficulty to mine it goes up as there’s more of it, therefore it’s designed to grow in value over time. So since its inception it’s been a scam. Sure, a scam some lucky people have been able to get in on early, but a scam none-the-less.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        Worse, it’s value is based on the work it requires to grow/maintain it. And that work is based on how much electricity/world resources it uses. Aka. Bad for the environment. And if you were to make say a new crypto currency that used far less processing power, that would be less work and thus have little value.

        In other words, you can’t fix the crypto currency problem of massive energy usage without destroying the value of it. When Bitcoin does die, it will have emitted millions of tons of green house gases while providing very few real services/transactions.

        • ayaya
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          That’s not true at all. That only applies to coins using “proof of work.” Ethereum for example is extremely popular and doesn’t use that. You should really learn more about the topic before spreading misinformation.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            Yes I am familiar with that and heard that argument before. It does provide some other functions that can negate some of the proof of work. But it is also subject to proof of work to a lesser degree but that means it will also hit some equilibrium. Will that outweigh the benefits it provides and this be ultimately viable and more important, environmentally viable? With my experience in it, I am dubious.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I initially replied but deleted my reply because I wasn’t sure of myself but I’ve looked it up just to be sure and I can reply again in confidence: Gold isn’t deflationary.

          Gold is a standard in which remains stable among the currencies when compared to commodity goods. As other currencies inflate, gold also inflates, because it’s somewhat stable. Gold’s value does not increase over time, even though its value in relation to inflating currencies does.

          Essentially, as an example but one pulled completely out of my ass here: If bread cost 1 gram of gold 200 years ago, but that was a single shilling but now it takes 1000 shillings to buy bread, gold is now worth “1000 shillings”, but still buys the same bread. So it’s not increasing in value vs the things around it, only other currencies because they are inflating.

          • Nutomic
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            Which means that it’s deflationary against euro or usd. Also “there’s a limited amount of it, the difficulty to mine it goes up as there’s more of it”. So according to your definition gold is a scam. I wonder who is going to pull the rug on it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Wrong. Which means it’s stable, and the USD and EURO are inflationary. That’s why gold is gold. That’s why it’s a staple stock. Because it’s stable against everything that those currencies buy. It will basically, always be worth the same amount as it was 1000 years ago. Gold is the reference of a “stable” value. In the example I made, 1 gram of gold 200 years ago buys the same amount as 1 gram of gold today. That’s exactly how gold works. That’s why economies use it as a measuring stick of their own currency.

      • shastaxc
        link
        fedilink
        82 years ago

        This is not true of all crypto. It is true of bitcoin though.

  • @[email protected]
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    942 years ago

    From TFA:

    moderator u/Mcgillby. On-chain data reveals that this moderator transferred more than 100,000 MOON over two different transactions on the Arbitrum Nova blockchain, turning it into more than $23,000

    If there’s a dollar sign, it’s not play money anymore and the FTC should get involved.

    • Rhynoplaz
      link
      fedilink
      132 years ago

      …in Etherium." You left that part out. It’s still crypto.

      I’m not saying that makes it any better, but your own quote invalidates your own statement.

  • uphillbothways
    link
    fedilink
    7
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Lol.

    Reddit migration… $
    Fuck spez… $$$
    Reddit mods and admins getting fucked by the FTC/SEC… Fucking Priceless.