bottom text

  • UlyssesT [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I’ve seen his shit defended here before.

    I’ve rejected his quirky infographicy bazinga propaganda ever since his “if 99% of humanity was wiped out by an environmental crisis, that’s still a net win for future humanity!” :galaxy-brain: take.

    EDIT: Yes, it was an established poster, not a wrecker; I didn’t name names because I didn’t want to start that specific struggle up again.

    Yes, I didn’t like it and I feel vindicated about Kurzgesagt being lib propaganda with every additional video that Kurzgesagt comes out with. Being told “if you ignore X Y and Z Kurzgesagt actually has great takes about specific topics” :morshupls: was bullshit to me then and is bullshit to me now. Have grievances with me if you must about that. :ok:

      • DefinitelyNotAPhone [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 years ago

        Translating from Ulysses talk: “I’ve seen people defending X even on Hexbear” usually means “there was a wrecker with a bad take two years ago and now I’m going to make it sound like it’s a common thing.”

        • UlyssesT [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          In the cause of Kurzgesagt, it was not a wrecker; it was someone with an established post history. I just didn’t name names.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 years ago

        Dunk me if you will, but in the case of Kurzgesagt defending, it was an established poster, definitely not a wrecker. I hope they changed their mind eventually.

        • ProletarianDictator [none/use name]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          I may have been a radlib at the time, but I don’t think Kurzgesagt was pumping out propaganda from the outset. It was mostly shit about physics and black holes and cool nerd stuff. Feels like all of that was a Trojan horse for the propaganda in retrospect.

          • UlyssesT [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            In the past I think there may have been some plausible defense for Kurzgesagt videos, even if I hated the cute quirky :reddit-logo: targeting presentation from the start and even recommended videos from well meaning progressives rubbed me the wrong way (the one about “keys to power” comes to mind).

            The “99% of humans killed off is a victory for the 1%!” take from Kurzgesagt was so on the nose in favor of :capitalist-laugh: that from that point forward such defenses were inexcusable to me.

            • ProletarianDictator [none/use name]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              I know the exact CGPGrey video you’re talking about too 💀

              “99% of humans killed off is a victory for the 1%!”

              I have not seen this one, and I’m so glad I stopped watching holy shit

              • UlyssesT [he/him]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                I know the exact CGPGrey video you’re talking about too 💀

                My mistake, that was a CGPGrey video; I didn’t like his videos either even if the presentation is less slick and big budget sus to me.

                I have not seen this one, and I’m so glad I stopped watching holy shit

                I believe it was the “what happens if there’s a big calamity that threatens life on Earth” video. Yeah its conclusion was that it’d be great for the 1% that remains, because the implication was, presumably, that :porky-happy: can repopulate the magically livable planet after the worst was over.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      That’s called bipartisanship and it’s the goal of every Third Way enlightened centrist :billdawg:

    • edge [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      French Guiana, Françafrique, the Dutch Antilles, Greenland, las Malvinas, Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, and a bunch more.

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Puerto Rico is a commonwealth, not a colony. Its right there in the name.

      The US Virgin Islands are simply where we store our national reserve of virgins.

      Nobody ask about Haiti.

    • SoyViking [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Ackshually it is an overseas department and not a colony.

      Tankies destroyed by facts and logics.

    • Gosplan14_the_Third [none/use name]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Also the Amazon, Northern Canada, de Jure Palestine, Kashmir, various islands across the world like New Caledonia, the Northern Territory (Australia) and a few more

  • BrezhnevsEyebrows [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    turning a big dial that says “Democracy” on it and constantly looking back at the audience for approval like a contestant on the price is right