I’m fucking done with Chrome. Fuck this.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    62 years ago

    It was never great. The only use for chrome was to load the two or three sites that would only load in chrome and then ignore it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    202 years ago

    I love how they position it as a privacy feature, and then fail to explain how it does anything to increase privacy.

      • RandoCalrandian
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        The topics become a super valuable fingerprinting metric, as well as continuing a form of cross site tracking now that 3rd party cookies are taken more seriously

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The fact that they want you to do this again every 4 weeks is downright laughable.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      212 years ago

      The fact that anyone in /privacy/ uses any google products or services is also quite laughable.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            82 years ago

            What does it mean then, if not implying that you’re not a real Privacy user or cannot be interested in improving your privacy situation if you use Google products?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              That’s like worrying about privacy while using Facebook and tiktok. Moreover, accessing all of your personal information on a device created by Facebook.

            • aeternum
              link
              fedilink
              52 years ago

              I honestly, i think it’s the truth. You can’t be a privacy enthusiast if you use google products. It’s the antithesis of privacy.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                22 years ago

                What about someone who has been slowly degoogling themselves but isn’t all the way there yet?

                On that note, any suggestions for a privacy-friendlier alternative for my favorite but most difficult-to-replace Google service, location history?

                • aeternum
                  link
                  fedilink
                  12 years ago

                  I think mosquito does location history. But it’s usually self hosted.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      It says that they’re auto deleted, there’s no action needed every 4 week by the user.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      It will be more often than that. The ad topics will be generated in a rolling fashion so expirations will be staggered.

  • Lord Wiggle
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    I use Opera. Built-in ad/tracker blocker, cookie destroyer, free vpn and much more features. All chrome extensions work with opera.

  • YⓄ乙
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 years ago

    Imagine if Firefox implemented this and we don’t have any other browser to use without ads.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    17
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Wow, this comment section is a giant echo chamber. Really, guys?

    Yes, Google and Chrome are dumpster fires for privacy. But this is at least inching in the right direction, however small. Now the next time you shop for a present for your girlfriend on Valentine’s Day, you can prevent yourself from getting underwear ads for the next month.

    Also, if this is your last straw… you’ve had your head in the sand for over a decade. Google has been watching every single thing you do, categorizing it, and selling ad placement for that topic to the highest bidder ever since ads became their primary business model. Chrome just made it easier to do that.

    I ditched Chrome a short while ago due to its poor memory management and its inexplicable inability to handle certain sites that Edge can somehow handle fine for a third of the RAM hit. This wouldn’t have been my deal breaker.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      I have 4 different browsers installed, I use Chrome for work activities, as it supports the Outlook and Teams PWA’s and I’m not browsing ad-ridden sites. I use qutebrowser for personal stuff/bookmarks, and Firefox for uh, video browsing.

    • NumbersCanBeFun
      link
      fedilink
      23
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      No it’s not. Where is the “opt out, don’t track me” option? This isn’t any better. This is a just asking how you would like your toppings on your shit sandwich. They don’t give a fuck about us or you.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        This isn’t any better.

        What? Before, for many, many years, they didn’t even ask how you would like your toppings on your shit sandwich and you happily gobbled it up. They’re giving you the option to opt out of some topics, and NOW you’re pissed? It may not be a privacy slam-dunk (why are you using Chrome, anyway?), but it’s better than the nothing that existed before.

        Of course Google doesn’t care. They’re not going to give you an opt-out option. They’re an ad company, and their whole business is knowing your interests to get you to buy from advertisers. The search engine is just to get you in the door. The moment you press enter, they’re selling you something.

        • NumbersCanBeFun
          link
          fedilink
          82 years ago

          They started off as a search engine with the motto “don’t be evil”. Let’s get our facts straight before you try to talk me down like I don’t know anything.

          Fuck their ads and fuck whatever this monster is. I opt out by making sure my security settings are so high most pages won’t load until I manually configure what I allow. Everyone has the option to do this but it’s a massive pain in the ass so I get it. It doesn’t mean we all need to passively accept getting fucked.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            62 years ago

            They started off as a search engine with the motto “don’t be evil”. Let’s get our facts straight before you try to talk me down like I don’t know anything.

            Google was selling ads about 4 years before their IPO when the “Don’t Be Evil” motto was first revealed to the public. There is a “History of Google” page on Wikipedia if you want to brush up on the facts and timeline.

            The fact remains that they’re now an advertising company. This was their monetization model and how they’ve amassed 90%+ of their wealth.

            You can fiddle with your security however you want. I settle for “good enough” with things that aren’t Chrome, because my time isn’t worth analyzing each individual cookie on a page to get the info I am looking for. Firefox and uBlock Origin are a good enough layer of protection.

            • NumbersCanBeFun
              link
              fedilink
              52 years ago

              That doesn’t make them an advertising company. It was a search engine that sold ads to gain monetization. However at this point we are just splitting hairs over perspective so I’ll bury the hatchet there.

              I can and I do encourage EVERYONE to fiddle with their security, not just because of Google but because eventually you’re going to stumble into some shitty website by accident and that fucker is going to pop you with a some random JavaScript that you already told your browser is totally fine to run automatically.

              There is way more at stake here than a couple of tracking cookies, but it starts there. They need the permission to read, track and modify files on your machine in order to “sell” you the best advertisements. This means always having JavaScript turned on as well as allowing permissions which often are automatically accepted. This opens people up to a massive security risk with no reward. Google gets to walk away smiling while you’re scraping viruses and malware off your machines left and right.They aren’t here to educate or give you a choice, they just send you along after you pass GO and they get to collect the $200.

              I’m sorry but no, it’s not okay to try to convince the public this is a good thing. I’d wager Google spent a pretty penny trying to figure out a way to get people like you to agree that isn’t so terrible when it’s so obvious what they are doing is absolutely unacceptable.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      This is one of those situations where people are mad at the right person for the wrong reasons and I never know how to respond. I hate misinformation, so I lean towards wanting to try and point out what’s wrong, but long-form nuanced explanations don’t fit well with the situation and will change zero minds so why bother? At least there’s some people switching to Firefox as a result, I guess.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    62 years ago

    With both Chrome and Edge enshittifying themselves, nows a great time for Apple to ship Safari for Windows again.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Oh please no, Safari is… weird. It’s the new IE for front-end developers.

      “Hey Safari, here’s the response from an API call.”

      Safari: Oh, you didn’t specify how to cache this. I guess I’ll just cache it… forever!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    102 years ago

    I haven’t used chrome in about 5 or 6 years now. Firefox all the way. I can’t support a monopoly on the web.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    62 years ago

    Have to use chrome at work and it’s just such a shitty browser experience. Don’t understand why anyone would use it unless they actually use Google for work.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Even though google bought double click I some times wonder if it was just double click wearing a google skin the whole time scobbydoo style