X adds video calling — and lets strangers ring you: Turned on by default, tool lets anyone you follow potentially call you up::Turned on by default, tool lets anyone you follow potentially call you up

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1182 years ago

    I’m going to go ahead and assume the one person on X that you can’t call is old Muck himself. Wonder why?

    Then again, X is such a shit show and Elon is so incapable of thinking two steps ahead of his feet that maybe you can call him lol

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 years ago

      To be fair anyone can already call me with my phone number. Although it’s pretty anoying too.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        122 years ago

        I remember years ago a high school friend of mine freaked out because her phone number and current address showed up in one of those free people search sites. I asked her “Are you listed in the phone book?” and she said “oh… yeah… I am”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        This is a bit different. This is the equivalent of letting me call you right now because I know your username. I literally don’t need to know anything else about you, except for your activity on the site. That said I’m somewhat impressed. Impressed by how anyone would come up with something this stupid.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      272 years ago

      He might not consider it a necessary feature. I mean, not even his own kids want to talk to him.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      182 years ago

      The system means that all accounts are liable to receive calls from accounts you follow, or those run by people whose number you have in your address book. To be able to call someone, they must have sent at least one direct message to your account.

      He’s probably left it on.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 years ago

      My bet is he’d be too fucking arrogant and think people would genuinely call him out of admiration and he could create some viral moment showcasing how awesome he is.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        My bet is this isn’t really about people calling each other, but more about exTwitter having access to users’ microphones and cameras and is turned on by default.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 years ago

      Why would anyone want this functionality?

      I’m guessing this is so if Elon gets a negative reply to one of his tweets he can call that person up and threaten them or something?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    95
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I can already make video calls from Signal, which isn’t run by neofarcists.

    (That was a typo, but it’s fitting.)

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Twitter has added video calling – and left it turned on by default.

    The feature is now being officially rolled out, Elon Musk confirmed.

    Video calls are part of Elon Musk’s plans to make Twitter, which he has renamed X, into the “everything app”, offering a wide array of different functionality.

    For now, video calls are limited to the iOS app, and appear to be rolling out slowly.

    From the direct message settings, users can either disable it entirely or change it so that they can receive calls from people in your address book, from people you follow, or from all “verified” users.

    If the feature is enabled, then a phone icon should show within the direct message conversation, and tapping audio or video will start the relevant kind of call.


    The original article contains 289 words, the summary contains 131 words. Saved 55%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    162 years ago

    Why do people still use X these days? Stop using and EM will eventually be forced to close the company down

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    Anyone still on twitter who is actually affected by this deserves every bit of it. What else did they think Musky was going to do.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      56
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      An explanation I’ve heard for why we don’t have “everything apps” in the US is because we all have an app store on our phones and that’s the niche the everything apps were really solving for.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        That and i think we also adopted technology differently. Places like China or india in a way skipped most of the PC/Laptop phase and went straight to smartphones as their main device to access everything. On a PC/Laptop you’ll access most things through a browser, so many services already existed this way and also remain accessible through that.

        And even to this day many will prefer to do some things on a larger screen rather than a smartphone, even if by now it is the primary device.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          82 years ago

          Comes pre-installed on the phone. I think it was possible to download apps from websites too, it was just not as convenient.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            So is there like a single app on their Home Screen?

            They tap it and it opens an app with a bunch of other apps in it? Or a bunch of tabs, or other widgets you have to scroll around to find the functionality you want?

            I get why China would want this, for content control. But I don’t see why india or anywhere else would want this.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              7
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              There are still like calculator apps and web browsers and such, “everything” is more like instead of Paypal/Venmo, you use WeChat. Instead of ApplePay, WeChat. Instead of Facebook, WeChat. Instead of Uber, WeChat. It’s just all that functionality smashed into one app.

              I don’t think it’s designed by the state to be centralized, it’s just how things happened in a lot of Asia.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      The idea of an everything app (AKA Superapp) is that all of it’s features are interoperable. The OS doesn’t do anything except provide an environment for apps to run.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Well it’s hard to tell sarcasm online, especially when no steps to convey tone or articulation have been added to the text formatting.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                32 years ago

                Or, you know, instead of pulling a straw man simply italicize part of the comment to emphasize sarcasm…

                • Trailblazing Braille Taser
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  62 years ago

                  I get that you have a hard time recognizing jokes and non-literal language, and I really do sympathize, but it’s unreasonable to expect everyone to change the way they write. Realistically, it’s just not going to happen. Your options are to accept that you will frequently misunderstand people or try to level up your reading comprehension.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    262 years ago

    The system means that all accounts are liable to receive calls from accounts you follow, or those run by people whose number you have in your address book. To be able to call someone, they must have sent at least one direct message to your account.

    You’re not going to get phone calls from just any rando.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      222 years ago

      You’re right. Cause I deleted that app months ago.

      “They must have sent one DM” - so any rando that has sent an unwelcome DM can follow it with a call?

      • malijaffri
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        To be able to call someone, they must have sent at least one direct message to your account.

        Emphasis mine.

        To me, it seems like it means that for me to be able to call you, you need to send me at least one DM AND be following me. So, in essence, any rando that you folllow and have previously sent a DM to can call you.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          That’s my interpretation. If you follow someone, and have sent them a message previously, it’s a reasonable assumption you want to talk to them.

  • Gazumi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Stragglers of a dying platform get new bait and switch service. Expect fees once enought people use it.