The Chrome team says they’re not going to pursue Web Integrity but…

it is piloting a new Android WebView Media Integrity API that’s “narrowly scoped, and only targets WebViews embedded in apps.”

They say its because the team “heard your feedback.” I’m sure that’s true, and I can wildly speculate that all the current anti-trust attention was a factor too.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    142 years ago

    I absolutely do not trust Chrome or the google team. It does not make me feel any better the only barrier to them trying to ruin a internet a bit is some backlash.

    • Kerrigor
      link
      fedilink
      212 years ago

      Problem is big sites you’re forced to use (banking sites, work HR systems, etc) would’ve made shitty decisions and required it to use their site. It would be like the old “you have to use IE 6” era

      • yukichigai
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        Various state and federal accessibility laws would’ve made that a very questionable decision for a lot of industries. Given that it would cost money simply to get programmers to implement and might lead to more costs from legal challenges I suspect a lot of sites like banks and the like would’ve avoided it.

        Now when it comes to basically any news site, entertainment service, social media, online store, or anything else that makes extra money on ads and harvesting user data? Oh yeah, they’d implement it in a heartbeat.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Banking site: We’ve implemented the Web Integrity API because security is important to us.

        Also the banking site: Your password can only be six characters.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            52 years ago

            I’m in Canada and I haven’t registered on a banking site recently, but I have definitely had stupidly low password length limits on banking sites in the past. The password from my old Bank of Montreal account that was last updated in 2015 is only 6 characters, and it’s only numbers and letters; I would have definitely had 1Password generate a better password if the rules had allowed it.

            • Polar
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              Tangerine used to have 4-6 digit PIN (no password) to access your online-only account.

              Not sure if they still do. I believe so, though.

            • livus
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              Interesting. I’m in New Zealand and my bank passwords are all proper length and characterset. They also have 2FA.

              I always thought it was just the US that has an antiquated banking system.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1362 years ago

    They’re just starting it smaller scale. Within a year it’ll be pushed out to everyone broadly.

    • IHeartBadCode
      link
      fedilink
      372 years ago

      This is literally going to be what they did for FLoC. Basically release it as topics.

      Google absolutely cannot stop tracking everyone at this point. I’m pretty sure they’ve put the entire house on the bet to track people more and do everything to ensure that Google Chrome tracks every aspect of your web browsing experience.

      So while WEI is dead, I think Google’s boat is so far out to sea now that it’s either try this again a bit more gently or watch the ship sink. Everyone said FLoC was dead and they absolutely put it into the web browser with Topics. Nothing convinces me this is any different, they are absolutely going to, and I dare say have an existential need to, put this shit in everyone’s browser.

    • Norgur
      link
      fedilink
      332 years ago

      They get the permissions for the little thing that is worded vaguely enough to them funnel people into the larger thing

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      212 years ago

      Yes, something tells me that they will just switch to attempting to introduce this piecemeal so that fewer people will notice what’s going on.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Google isn’t proceeding. Maybe now they’ll realize YouTube is also suffering from their poor decisions.

    • Polar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      YouTube isn’t suffering. Lemmy has an active userbase of just over 30K. Given the fact a lot of people have multiple accounts (I do), that’s less than 30K active users.

      On top of that, probably less than half of Lemmy users actually cry about YouTube.

      Even if we are generous, and say the entirety of Lemmy, and each user is unique, 30K is nothing lol.

  • Cyborganism
    link
    fedilink
    English
    182 years ago

    Good! Now we just need to degoogle everything else on the internet.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    582 years ago

    the web has been getting so shitty lately i’ve actually gotten into drawing and reading and vinyl and film, which i highly recommend as a backup plan; just the idea of this feels like the atomic bomb for the internet

    • BlinkerFluid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      462 years ago

      The mainstream web… yes.

      The back of the house has never been fucking better. Mastodon changed the game. Why hang out at some asshole’s website, hating the website, lacking features and full of advertisements to suck you dry, when you can just come down to the flea market of federated social media and shoot the shit with someone real?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 years ago

      Yeah gotta wait for the heat on this antitrust probe to die down before doing the dirty.

  • cannache
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    One set of standards for the internet systems, and multiple measurements and methods I say, hardly makes sense to split the whole web to pieces over advertising money, especially when access to knowledge, strength, capability to invent and discover of all sorts is now at such an all time high.

    We’ve yet to build anything on the moon or create livable spaces in outer space

  • Meldroc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 years ago

    Ah, let me guess, now Google’s gonna get everyone and their sister to move all their content to apps…

    • Kumatomic
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 years ago

      They already have. I can barely go to a mobile page that isn’t broken or doesn’t have a pop up I must dismiss telling me it’s better in the app when it most certainly is not. Some things I use have let their desktop web pages go into disrepair and when I contact them with my issues logging in they just tell me to use the app and that their site has been down for months. Gotta force that tracking and those arbitration clauses somehow.

      • setVeryLoud(true);
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Tell them that you don’t own a smartphone and that you can’t use their product.

        Might not solve the issue in the short run, but eventually they’ll hopefully realize that a desktop site is important as well.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    222 years ago

    While this “battle” may be won for now, I’ve no doubt Google will simply try to implement this in a different way with less backlash.