EDIT: To the people downvoting this post because democrats > republicans: you’re missing the point.

  • balderdashOP
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    EDIT: To the people downvoting this post because democrats > republicans: you’re missing the point.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      People: But they aren’t perfect!

      Me (trans): But…I want to live tho

      People: But gaza!!!

      Me: It is literally illegal for trans minors to get any gender dysphoria treatment in my state and they’re drafting bills for adult bans, please help me (and also Republicans would’ve gone even harder supporting Israel)

      People: BoTh SiDeS!!!

  • MxM111
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    In multy-party system, you often end up voting for a party that then on your behalf makes deals with other parties to form coalition, deals you did not agree upon. It is like delegation of duty, or rather usurpation of your vote. And you still end up with fucked up government that does not reflect your values. In two party system you are the one who are forced to make those compromises.

    In multiparty system, often one coalition (or even party) dominates for many years and election cycles. The two party system nearly guarantees strong opposition.

    I still think that two party system is better.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 years ago

    Because the rich have spent 2 centuries entrenching themselves in power, and literally everyone else won’t do a thing about it.

    We’re all so apathetic that the impending collapse of our ecosystem is viewed with a shrug. When it should be met with torches and pitchforks in the street, and Madame Guillotine for the rich and powerful.

    Nobody gives a shit because they’re all waiting for someone else to do something.

    • Cylusthevirus
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Oh I’m pretty sure the rich entrenching their power goes back a wee bit longer than 2 centuries. Ask a feudal peasant.

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
    link
    fedilink
    112 years ago

    The Constitution was literally the best a bunch of doped-up, syphilitic slaveholders could come up with to replace the divine right of kings. They even had a first try with the Articles of Confederation and fucked that up.

    We really need to stop teaching kids that a system of government written by people who used leeches to cure hysteria is the greatest thing ever created.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      122 years ago

      It is all over everything right now. It’s giving me PTSD from 2016. Are we voting Jill Stein again?

    • IHeartBadCode
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      If the duopoly of our government is enough to convince folks not to vote, they weren’t going to vote anyway and were just looking for a reason.

      I don’t disagree with OP, but at the same time, we’ve only got one tool to enact change. So let’s use that tool to get things like ranked voting.

      But you’re also right, plenty of folks out there telling folks to give up. All the more reason to not in my opinion.

      • Maeve
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        That’sa lie. I’ve voted every election since eligible age but fuck the two majors. I’m happy to write in, but I’m not keen on Cornell anymore either so I’m about to nope, unless someone better than the status quo comes along.

    • balderdashOP
      link
      fedilink
      142 years ago

      I’ve voted democrat for every election I can remember. And while I like to see my “team” win as much as the next guy, at some point you realize that other countries have better electoral systems in place.

      Meanwhile, we’ve all acquiesced to this 2-party winner takes all bullshit.

        • balderdashOP
          link
          fedilink
          8
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Sweden, Germany, Colombia, Australia, etc. Ranked/Alternative/Proportional voting. We should have multiple choices without fear of voting for less popular options being useless. With our current system we basically can’t vote for third parties.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            52 years ago

            I’m skeptical of ranked choice voting being a panacea after watching Eric Adams get elected in New York

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Let’s not pretend that ranked choiced voting in Oz didn’t elect Tony Abbott, the prototype for Trump’s one liners and spewing hate.

            Every answer to whatever question: “Stap the boats”

            Don’t get me wrong. I’m all for it. But it’s not some silver bullet that will make all the party candidates turn into Jesus.

        • skulblaka
          link
          fedilink
          52 years ago

          Australia, Ireland, New Zealand, Malta, Northern Ireland and Scotland all have ranked choice vote. Slovenia had it previously but regressed to FPTP in 2021.

      • Franklin
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Look I hate a two party system as much as the next person but the both sides are the same thing is just not true, don’t say it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          02 years ago

          The most confusing thing to me is how Democrats can have majorities in the House and POTUS and their agenda gets inched along but the second Republicans have that their agenda gets rammed through asap.

          Is that a misconception? It certainly seems that Republicans make much more aggressive and active use of their power.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            House

            this is incorrect, the GOP controls the House atm. The Dems control the Senate.

            Really, take time to understand how legislation is crafted in a bicameral congress, it’s worth it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              02 years ago

              I didn’t say they controlled the house, I described what they do when they control the house.

              Do pay attention to the complexities of the English language, it’s really worth it :-P

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            If you’re referring to relatively recent events (like the first 2 years of Biden’s term) you need to look no further than Kyrsten Sienema and Joe Manchin. “Democrats” that opposed the agenda (and general Good Things™) for personal greed and lobbying interests. Biden had a majority in the house, and a hostile supreme court, which we’re going to be dealing with for a good long time that’s to McConnell’s fuckery. The defection of Sienema and Manchin made progress very difficult.

            It’s also harder to get the wider variety of interests in the big tent of left to go in the same direction. Kinda like herding cats.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    362 years ago

    “first past the post” voting always devolves to a two party system. The founding fathers knew this and warned against it. Until we get ranked choice, or something similar, we’re stuck.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    02 years ago

    Don’t ‘both sides’ this one. The rule is and has always been:

    • vote for the option that will help us be healthier, happier, and do our part
    • repeat

    The two options aren’t even comparable anyway. It’s like comparing the Flu to Covid.

  • donuts
    link
    fedilink
    8
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Here are some cold hard Ameri-facts for you:

    • Having 2 dominant political parties is a reflection of how our political systems have been designed at almost every level (federal, state, local). American politics is very much based on first-past-the-post, winner-takes-all elections. These kinds of election systems are terrible for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is the very real problem of vote splitting and the spoiler effect–leading to “third parties” which are almost all unserious, nonviable, and potentially backed by people with ulterior motives. The vast majority of the time, voting for a third party candidate in America is simply throwing your vote away and is effectively the same as not voting. (Even as a “protest”, it’s not a very good one, because it’s never clear what can be interpreted from why people vote the way they do.)

    The solution to this problem is changing how we run elections so that the most popular candidates are more likely to win, and so that people’s individual votes are less likely to become nullified in various ways (like by voting for a statistically nonviable candidate, for one). I like Ranked Choice Voting and STAR voting, but just about anything is better than the way that most American elections currently work.

    • Even in a hypothetical future where we have 10 viable parties (and more democratic voting systems), no political party is going to “give a fuck about you” as an individual. Republicans, Democrats, Greens, Libertarians, Vegetarians, Librarians, and whatever other parties spring up. The truth is, they all only give a fuck about getting your vote, so that they can get in a position of political power to do the things that they and their influential backers want (all the while reaping the benefits of doing so). There is no political party on Earth that is in it for the benefit of all of mankind–they all have some kind of agenda and ideology that they want to put in place.

    In that way American politics is like a tug of war, we current have 2 viable parties, one pulling the rope to the left and another pulling the rope to the right. You can spend as much time as you want lamenting where the rope currently is compared to where you would like it to be. But if you want the rope to move left, it makes sense to join the left side. And if you want the rope to move right, it makes sense to join the right side. Sitting out just makes it easier for the “other side” to make “progress”. Having more parties doesn’t really change that, it just turns a 1-dimensional battle into an n-dimensional battle.

    The biggest benefit that comes from having multiple (viable) political parties is increased competition of ideas. But again, America truly require huge systemic changes to how we run elections to make that a reality.

    I’m going to be voting for the party that more closely aligns with the direction that I want the country to move in. It’s the only smart move in the game of American politics.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    This is dumb as shit. Democrats aren’t perfect but they do care. That is why they actively took steps to stop people from dying during COVID unlike the GOP. That’s why they support universal healthcare, unlike the GOP. That’s why they support public education unlike the GOP. That is why they support free and fair elections unlike the GOP.