• kbal
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    The world would be a substantially better place if Signal would 1) Not require phone numbers, and 2) Allow 3rd-party clients. While they’re at it maybe they could also add a volume control to the desktop client and then not push so many damn updates.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      I haven’t had a single complaint in my few months if using it.

      That being said, I have 3 people to use it with so on average have only gotten about 20 minutes per week.

      I will say that the WiFi calling on their app is far superior to the samsung’s drag down buttons.

  • NekuSoul
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Annoyingly, this doesn’t mean that you can register without a phone number. I hope that this is only the first step towards making that happen and not some sort of compromise of the original goal.

    I still use Signal because I think it’s still the best tool so far (that has people I know using it), but I’m always iffy about services using phone numbers as their primary identifier.

  • Free Palestine 🇵🇸
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    Signal is finally delivering the stuff we have all been waiting for. First, they implemented post quantum cryptography in the protocol in September, then we got message editing, and now we will finally get usernames. Awesome!

    • taanegl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 years ago

      Pretty much. Signals servers just initiate connection between clients, who in turn negotiate parameters with each other so that messages can be encrypted and sent privately between the clients. The messages never has to touch Signals servers, unless you’ve turned on certain features. It’s what you could call a “peer-to-peer chat”.

      It’s apps for Android and iOS are available on GitHub, as well as libraries dedicated to the Signal protocol that you can use and implement in your own projects.

      So it’s transparent, private and secure. Pretty boss. Waiting for someone to correct me on this one ^^;

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      I don’t use Telegram but they don’t enable encryption by default? Last time I used Telegram I needed a phone number still, so, I’d say Signal has always been on top.

      • petrescatraian
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        @librechad

        they don’t enable encryption by default?

        Indeed, only secret chats use it, that’s it’s biggest drawback.

        Last time I used Telegram I needed a phone number still

        Yes, for registering purposes. However, you can set up your own username and give that to whoever you want instead. You can even restrict some or all people from seeing your actual number.

  • some pirate
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 years ago

    I will spam every contact I have with this information, it’s time to people to start making the switch