By Zayatoon comics

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      191 year ago

      Noobish kdr. Max 10 millions deaths, somewhere between a French general during WWI (not counting German casualties) and minor paranoid dictators. Too much time larping as a psychopathic torturer, not enough time getting the job done. Mao killed several million people on a good mood, that’s professionalism.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        That’s ridiculous, you can’t judge the genocidal madmen KDA on body count alone, Leopold simply did more evil with less resources than anyone ever!

        Starting position matters, and Leopold came from behind to become one of the worsts.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      341 year ago

      While it has proven difficult to accurately estimate the pre-colonial population and the amount by which it changed under the Congo Free State, estimates for the Congolese population decline during Leopold’s rule range from 1 million to 15 million.

      That’s a lot, but not even close to Mao

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    111 year ago

    Mosquitoes, thanks to Malaria. Estimated kill count (according to a Nature article from 2002) 50-60 Billion people.

    • YeetPics
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Wow. You’re really gonna just blame a whole race over a few billion deaths?

      /s please don’t hang me in these streets

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      More a person responsible kinda thing. I think Mao does top it but due to starvation thanks to his idiot policies that ruined crops

      • Communist
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        Well, the workers didn’t own the means of production, they didn’t abolish currency, they didn’t do anything about class division, they didn’t abolish the state, they didn’t empower the working class, and they aren’t going to do any of these things later, but on the other hand, you clearly think mao was very trustworthy so surely you must just be taking his word for it.

          • Communist
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            “land tilled by the peasantry was increasingly subject to government control, undoing many key principles of ownership as we shall see in the subsequent section ‘The Collectivisation of Agriculture.’”

            So… the government took it. Making it a meaningless gesture. Communism is not when the government owns things.

            Y’know it’s not hard to figure this stuff out. The government took everything in china. That doesn’t even take research, that’s basic knowledge.

            Bold of you to call me “fucking stupid” when you didn’t even read your own source, not to mention that that’s ONE of the requirements, not all of them, and they didn’t even do that.

              • Lemminary
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                You feel very comfortable calling everyone a fucking idiot, though. Do you know what rule #1 is?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author’s website, for instance).

                  Not everyone is an idiot. You are.

              • Communist
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Especially trying to accuse me of not reading the source when you skipped past to the very last paragraph to dishonestly quote out of context a line that even within itself betrays the fact that you’re being a dishonest piece of shit.

                Congratulations, you’ve at best given 1 of the things that I listed… and tried to turn that into me being the idiot and not you. Except you didn’t because you know full well the chinese government owns that now. They didn’t give the land to the people, they pretended to briefly and then took it for themselves. Unlike you I have actually bothered to research these things: https://resourcehub.bakermckenzie.com/en/resources/global-corporate-real-estate-guide/asia-pacific/china/topics/real-estate-law

                Who owns land in china? the chinese government. So, no, they did not even make an attempt.

                You said they didn’t do anything about class division and being the debatelord idiot you are, you decided to ignore the fact as you read it that they abolished an entire landlord class so you could stay on course with your reply.

                When the government takes everything is that solving class division in your mind, or is that just creating a new class that owns everything?

                Now, what I want you to try to do, with your very useful and very large brain is compare the list of things that make communism, and compare the list of things that the chinese did, right, and notice that the chinese didn’t do any of them.

                1. Abolish class division < they created a new class, their own bourgeois, and took everything. This could ARGUABLY be an attempt… and it’s the best you’ve got.
                2. Abolish currency < not even attempted
                3. Abolish the state < not even attempted
                4. Give the workers the means of production < not even attempted

                So, at best, they attempted one of the things… and didn’t do it.

                And when I say you don’t need research for this, I’m saying that it’s common knowledge that the chinese government took anything… Even gradeschoolers know that.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  Congratulations, you’ve at best given 1 of the things that I listed

                  Pretty fucking important thing

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      That’s pretty fucked in the head, fam, even if these lists love blaming single communists but it when it comes time to talk about the death tolls of WW1 and 2 it’s always a shared responsibility and contextual.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        What else would it be? I don’t see how one could blame WW1 on a single person. Though I would say most of WW2 could be blamed on a single person, if you really feel like it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          The common narrative of WW1 is that it indeed was started by a single person. Gavrilo Princip assassinated Archduke Franz Ferdinand which most people agree was the inciting incident that caused WW1.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            41 year ago

            Even high school history talks about how it was all building up to that event and the event alone wasn’t the cause

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            I think it would be quite reductive to just blame the assassin. Sure, he was the one that created the spark that ignited the conflict, but it had been brewing for years, and we can’t ignore the roles the heads of states were playing in starting the war.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          The sequel was completely inevitable. You could argue it was all because of one person, but that person appearing was basically predetermined.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            41 year ago

            I agree, but if you ignore all historical context, you could blame one person if you really wanted to, was what I meant.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          And Mao personally executed 40 million people, huh? There wasn’t an entire ecosystem of officials fabricating reports at every level? His head of state security gets no credit for making everyone afraid to tell the truth?

          Hell, the obnoxious thing about it is all it really does it blame the wrong single communist, people go on about the sparrows but Lysenkoism had destroyed crop yields before they got exterminated.

          So, yes, it is as absurd to blame Mao entirely for The Great Leap Forward as it is to blame a Serbian assassin for WW1. There were cultural considerations, treaties, idiot officials, an agricultural policy built almost entirely on fraud, etc etc.

          The most devastating thing about the Great Leap Forward is that the famine was entirely preventable if people weren’t afraid to tell the truth, and that simply isn’t a situation that can be built by one person.

          Hell, there were good crops left to rot because the workers had left for the industrialization projects in the cities. Do you think Mao personally said “fuck that rice, go build some tractors?”

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Everything is contextual. Hell the plan the assassins had was exactly to provoke a war. They might not have thought it would get as big as it did, they just wanted a civil war for independence, but if intentions don’t matter, and they must not for this discussion because the intention of The Great Leap Forward wasn’t to starve people.

              The funny thing with The Black Hand’s plan is, it worked. Serbia didn’t just get independence, it became the primary power of Yugoslavia when the Austro-Hungarian Empire was dissolved.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    481 year ago

    I get the joke but I still expected some tankies to show up. But then again, OP is on lemmy.world which is defederated with the tankie instances so that’s why

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      The vast majority of deaths under communism have been because of famine…

      …which may well be true for Capitalism as well.