• @iegod@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    402 years ago

    Anyone paying for reddit premium has to just be the biggest sucker. Then again I don’t understand anyone paying for a similar privilege on twitch either. Batshit insanity.

    • @Ducks@ducks.dev
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      I pay for twitch turbo because I watch twitch for hours upon hours and keeping up with the latest ad block for twitch is more effort than it’s worth to me. Especially when on devices where ad block is more challenging.

      • @Zana@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        I read this and was like that is a good idea, I watch an okay amount of Twitch and the adblock arms race is getting exhausting. I look it up, $12 a month???

        • @Ducks@ducks.dev
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          I’m still grandfathered in at $8 for a few more months, at which point I will re-evaluate

      • @hismajesty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        18
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I don’t get it. What’s challenging? uBlock Origin plugin installation? I watch twitch only to get warframe item drops, but i recently switched to twitch miner instead, but when i was watching the devstream(s) from time to time there were no ADs. So don’t get me wrong but the effort is almost non-existent.

        • @Ducks@ducks.dev
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It is not as simple as install uBlock Origin. I have uBlock, it is very easy to install a plugin.

          However, every other day the current ad block solution stops working for twitch and you need to install multiple plugins (uBlock, TTV LOL), modify your ublock, or use alternate twitch UI which has no features, and since it changes so frequently I need to manually keep up to date with the changes on github for multiple plugins and scripts. Not to mention none of that works on mobile when you’re away from home, I use Pi Hole and it doesn’t block twitch ads. The ad block doesn’t work on chromecast or other devices.

          Their ads are super aggressive, it is literally impossible to surf the website with ads. Every time you switch streams you’re served an ad which makes it very difficult to find people to watch or to follow multiple perspectives (I mainly watch RP).

          For a few bucks a month I don’t have to deal with it and I watch Twitch more than any other streaming platform or social media, so to me it is worth the ease and consistency of use by just having turbo. The only two subscriptions I have are YouTube Premium and Twitch Turbo because I don’t get ads and I don’t have to deal with blocking them.

          • Gianni R
            link
            fedilink
            52 years ago

            A service that so aggressively disrespects their free users is not a service I’d ever give my money to.

            • @Ducks@ducks.dev
              link
              fedilink
              62 years ago

              You’re not necessarily wrong, but the people who create the content I enjoy are on Twitch, so to me it is worth it. Everybody values things differently

  • @Invertedouroboros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    322 years ago

    Ok so this is just desperate right? Like chasing 3rd party devs off could theoretically force more people to use their app, the reddit gold thing could be them paving the way to put in something more abusive. But this? Hoping to annoy your users to the point that they’ll pay you a ransom to make you stop? How is this anything other than embarrassingly desperate?

    • @TechnoBabble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 years ago

      I agree, it seems like they’re doing everything they can to force users into the mindset of “you’re going to have to spend money here.”

      However… I don’t think that’s going to work. It’s a tactic that relies solely on Apple not allowing the user to customize their icons, which combines into a double whammy of “give me money to fix the thing that I broke.”

      Why do I have to pay when Android users don’t?

      Why is Reddit being greedy?

      This other site is free and doesn’t make me feel like I’m being taken advantage of every turn.

      Reddit is trying to capitalize on goodwill they already spent months ago. And the quality of the site is just going to get worse from here.

    • @cheery_coffee@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      142 years ago

      I think it’s actually an ad for /r/place, which is kinda like when your ex tries reminding you of all the good times you once had in an effort to win you back.

      • ThrDarkFlame
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        And then you go lie and say “Yeah sure, I’ll come back”, wait for them to leave the house to get some groceries, and then go douse the whole place in gasoline before lighting the match and leaving.

        This is my prediction for this year’s r/place

  • @letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    52 years ago

    Quick question… Using the jerboa app, if I click a link… What happens if I accept cookies?

    With RIF I knew they wouldn’t be saved.

    What’s the situation for me now?

    • Dodecahedron December
      link
      fedilink
      02 years ago

      I don’t know but what I do know is without sending cookies, the server won’t know it’s you. If you login to reddit on the app, cookies are saved so you can login again the next time you load the app.

        • Dodecahedron December
          link
          fedilink
          02 years ago

          Ok so if application xyz has a browser, assuming that browser isn’t just an embedded copy of a system browser (something that I am not sure is possible with android or ios development, i am just a web dev), it won’t know your reddit cookies unless you gave it. Or, more correctly, it may save your cookies for every site you visit, but that’s just normal browser behavior. If you visit reddit, your cookies are saved but if you didn’t login the cookies just identify you as a unique but otherwise unknown user. If you login, then your cookies are saved if you load up the in-app browser again and find that you are still logged into reddit.

          The only time where you could expect to be logged into reddit already via an in-app browser which you didn’t log in with previously is if that in-app browser is just an embedded system web browser where you are logged in.

          • @hangonasecond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            Nope, still not what they’re talking about. They’re saying, if you follow a post link to, say, www.example.com, and the app you’re using shows you the page in app (usually using system default browser) rather than taking you out to your browser app. The question is, if example.com asks for permission to use cookies will they stay in your browser or will they be cleared when you leave the page or close the app.

            • Dodecahedron December
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              The browser stores the cookies, so if it is a system browser then the system browser stores the cookies even if embedded in the app. It also means that the app isn’t likely aware of those cookies as it’s part of a separate app.

              Also, generally speaking, few developers want to build their own browser. It is far easier to just ask the OS to put a browser in a space provided by the app, than to build a browser that works well to be used on the greater internet and the actual app itself. I say this because “the browser stores the cookies” so if app xyz doesn’t use a system browser then app xyz is the browser. Like, any app can ask you for your reddit username and password, store that, make HTTP calls that login with your username and password, parse the HTML it gets from reddit, and report it back to you. This is essentially how lemmy apps work at a high level with one big difference: these apps and the server are both aware of each other, which is the same sort of situation where a company like google or reddit gives API access as a sort of contract between how the apps and servers with better security and full consent of all involved.

              Basically if you see reddit apps pop up which don’t use the official API, you should be wary. Doubtful they would make it onto the app stores but it’s always possible. It doesn’t mean they are nefarious, just that they could be.

              The good news is it’s pretty easy to tell what you are using.

              Logged into example.com somewhere on your device, then you open a freshly installed app, click a link to example.com and you are already logged in? System browser.

              Logged into example.com somewhere on your device, then you open a freshly installed app, click a link to example.com and you aren’t logged in? This could be another browser if you have more than one installed on your device. So the ask… does it look and function like shit? This isn’t a great test but again, building a browser that actually renders html css and js is difficult, so it’s likely to not work or look very well if it’s something built with the purpose of stealing data specifically.

  • @rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    372 years ago

    Just more subscription hell. It’s ridiculous anymore. I’ll need a subscription to flush my toilet at some point. I mean how much of this are consumers willing to put up with. Anyway Reddit is well on the path of monetizing themselves to irrelevance.

    • @DarkDiamondK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      I mean you technically already do pay a subscription to flush your toilet by paying a water bill, just you get a lot more benefits

    • @JshKlsn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      232 years ago

      I’ll need a subscription to flush my toilet at some point.

      It’s called a water bill. You pay it monthly, even if you don’t use any water!

      • @rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        I’m sure you get my point. Yes you have to pay the water bill to flush the toilet. There’s lots of other “subscriptions” for utilities like power, garbage collection, sewer. We call those bills not subscriptions and they’ve been around as long as modern society. I think we can take those for granted. Not in the same league as the subscription hell we’re seeing for online services these days.

        • gordon
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          To that point you already pay for internet in the same way you pay for water. Paying for a specific website is like paying to use a toilet.

          Analogy stands.

      • @Shikadi@wirebase.org
        link
        fedilink
        82 years ago

        Idk, I pay for my utilities based on usage, and there are fees too. The fees maybe could be argued are subscriptions, but they’re not the majority of the bill

      • ThrDarkFlame
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        I’m from NL… Would be better if there was a subscription to use toilets instead of paying 50c or more every time. Always have to carry coins around just incase you need to pee. Super annoying.

            • @JshKlsn@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              I know the US is hella behind in payment technologies, but can you tap your phone in NL to pay for toilets? I haven’t carried cash for 15+ years in Canada. If so, I honestly like that system. At least I wouldn’t encounter a group of homeless people shooting up in the timmies bathroom at 8pm.

              • ThrDarkFlame
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                You’d think so right, and everything else here is super tap to pay oriented… Most toilets aren’t though, maybe the ones at the train station, but that’s a whole other kettle of fish. You pay for that, then they give you a voucher back to go use at a store in the station. Nobody uses them, so it’s just extra overpriced and hella dirty.

                Honestly it’s a scam all round.

    • @Leviathan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      14
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      anymore

      That’s not how that word works.

      Edit: I didn’t say I I’ve never seen it used that way, i just find that particular use of it to be wrong.

      • @beaker@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        I understood perfectly and I bet a lot of others did too. I bet you understood it. So, mostly or completely successful use of the word to inject the desired thoughts into others’ heads. So, the word works that way, even if it sounds awkward to you.

        • @JshKlsn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          102 years ago

          Never understood why people get upset for learning. My sister is 33 and has her own business. Every time she writes emails or company ads, she types at a 3rd grade level.

          She uses the wrong “there”, says “should of”, etc.

          When I try to teach her, she gets angry. Why? Do you want to stay stupid?

          • @BraBraBra@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            42 years ago

            Time and place. Quite arrogant to assume someone isn’t just using local phrasing, as is the case here. People talk differently all over. The official use of English is simply official. How people actually use it in their communities is correct. Hope I’m being clear with my sentiment here.

            • Cybersteel
              link
              fedilink
              32 years ago

              Please sir, the only English I use is the Queef’s English.

          • CurseBunny [she/her]
            link
            fedilink
            62 years ago

            I don’t believe it’s so much about the correction itself as it is about ignoring what the person said and only piping up to correct. Imagine we are having a conversation and you spend 3 minutes telling me about how you struggled to get the lug nuts off your tire this morning while changing it and when you finished, all I had to offer you is “they’re on the rim, not the tire” and nothing more. It can come off as a bit rude.

      • @rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        It’s colloquial to the USA, it’s an expression. My grammar is usually good except when I bastardize it to make a point like, “I aint gonna take that crap” or “grammar corrections are getting ridiculous anymore.” In the USA you’d have to live under a rock to have never heard that expression.

  • gon
    link
    fedilink
    472 years ago

    Do iOS users not have free icon packs? I’m so confused by this…

    • @TwinTurbo@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      712 years ago

      You can’t change icons from the system/launcher settings. Individual apps can offer icon options, but they are internal to the app.

        • thablkafrodite
          link
          fedilink
          242 years ago

          But you can do what I did and use the shortcuts app to set custom icons and app names.

        • kratoz29
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          To each their own, I moved from iOS to Android in 2020 and first days I started experimenting with different icon packs, but not all are perfect or of my taste, nowadays I only use the monet icons feature for Pixel Launcher, but if it wasn’t for that I’d just use stock icons lol.

          • gon
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            I suggest the “Delta” icon pack, if you haven’t tried it yet. It’s really good, IMO.

          • @Lars34@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            152 years ago

            There are plenty of apps that allow you to change the app icon for free. This is entirely on Reddit.

          • @zebs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            62 years ago

            It’s the same on the Reddit Android app too (although the icon option in the app looks ok, the icon in the launcher is pixelated)

            • Alto
              link
              fedilink
              162 years ago

              At least you can freely change the icon on android

          • @Sjoerd1993@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            15
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Have become? If anything, iOS have historically been getting more customizable over time not less.

            And I don’t think it’s really accurate to compare iOS with MacOSX and earlier, entirely different systems with different use cases and form factors. I’d recon if Apple released a phone in 2002 it’s be just as locked down.

            Not trying to defend this by the way, just surprised by the usage of the word “become” here as if it used to be different for iPhones.

    • @chickadee@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      15
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Sort of, you can use the Shortcuts app to make a custom launcher and use any icon you want. It’s not very intuitive for the average user.

    • @Karlos_Cantana@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      I found an article from 2020 that said it wasn’t possible to use custom icons on an iPhone. Idk if that’s changed, since I don’t have an iPhone. I know customization is not something they are known for.

      • gkeep
        link
        fedilink
        112 years ago

        It’s more of a workaround: you need to make a shortcut (which you can set a custom icon to) to launch the app of your choice. This is still possible.

    • SpicyPeaSoup
      link
      fedilink
      362 years ago

      Obviously yes. Reddit could change the app icon to a swastika and hide the real icon behind a $50 paywall and people would still use the app because of convenience.

      • 001100 010010
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        “Don’t want your friends to think you are a nazi? Simple, just pay us 1 bitcoin… every month”

        • Xeelee
          link
          fedilink
          62 years ago

          Musk stole all his ideas for Twitter from Trump, so there.

      • @JshKlsn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        What? Redditors would pay MORE to change their icon to a swastika. Change the icon back, and charge $50 for a hate symbol and you got yourself a steady income, baby!

    • hh93
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 years ago

      just look at election-results around the globe and how easily a lot of people are fooled by populists…

      • WookieMunster
        link
        fedilink
        82 years ago

        Thinking people are retarded because they don’t pirate or self-host. Most people don’t have the time, room, energy to do it, you must be a genius

      • prole
        link
        fedilink
        18
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Weirdly, I’ve been using my parents’ Netflix credentials still and haven’t been kicked off yet. They live hours away so there’s no mistake there about being in the same household.

        Hopefully I’m not tempting fate too much by talking about it on the Internet lol

        • @jayandp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          72 years ago

          A relative I share an account with got the prompt last month. I setup a VPN at my place so they could connect once a month and “check in” at home with their mobile app. After that they could disconnect and continue watching on their Roku.

        • CaptainBlagbird
          link
          fedilink
          28
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Plot twist: Your parents can’t access their Netflix anymore but aren’t tech savvy enough to understand why, so they’re back at watching classic broadcast television.

          • prole
            link
            fedilink
            122 years ago

            Lol I was actually wondering something similar. That, or they haven’t said anything out of fear of sounding rude.

            I talk to them regularly though, and told my dad that I’m still logged in and watching it, so I hope he would have said something if it wasn’t working…

        • @Buckeye@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          My brother is on my account in a different state and neither he nor I have been booted. Hoping we just got missed and they’ll never notice.

      • Frog-Brawler
        link
        fedilink
        532 years ago

        I can somewhat understand both perspectives. Although I too sail the high seas, if you don’t have the aptitude to self host, and you only care to binge a show over the weekend, $12 (or whatever it costs now) is a somewhat justifiable expense. I mean, 1 comic book is $4-$6 on average these days. One of those might provide 15 minutes of entertainment and a month of anticipation. $12 is a good value.

        • Raltoid
          link
          fedilink
          62 years ago

          Even if only spend a few hours a month watching, it’s still pretty cheap entertainment.

          Hell, some good beers while binging a season will literally cost more than the monthly fee.

        • El Barto
          link
          fedilink
          132 years ago

          Everything I want to watch is readily available for streaming. Why self host unless you want to keep copies?

          • @interesting_bat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            72 years ago

            A big part of it for me was seeing streaming companies removing episodes due to “modern sensibilities”. Multiple censored IASIP episodes, removing the D&D episode of Community. I think this is going to happen more and more and I want all the content. Not just what was approved by some diversity group.

            • El Barto
              link
              fedilink
              4
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Agreed. I am as progressive as one can be, but there are limits.

              Just a few months ago I realized I haven’t seen one episode of The Office because Netflix removed it.

              Just give the option to “show/hide” them. But don’t hide them completely.

                • El Barto
                  link
                  fedilink
                  22 years ago

                  The one with the blackface joke. One of the characters - can’t remember his name right now - appeared wearing blackface just for a few seconds as part of a joke implying that blackface was, well, inappropriate.

          • JJROKCZ
            link
            fedilink
            202 years ago

            Because it’s available to stream NOW for $ but it may not be available LATER for $ or not

              • JJROKCZ
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                And they’re lives will worse for it /s their primary concern is where their next dose of clean water will come from

                • @GCostanzaStepOnMe@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  6
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  Yeah well the first reason they won’t find it is the drive melted away in the heat wave of 37’, got blown up in the second War of the Rhine in 39’, and since 52’ lies at the bottom of the Central European Ocean.

                  But also because I streamed instead of torrenting.

          • @NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            9
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Mostly because if you set it up right it’s near entirely automated and you don’t have to worry about media availability on your subscribed service.

            Edit: also a lot of the time we (Canada) miss out on a lot of content on streaming services

            • El Barto
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              Sure, but I meant to imply that I can stream without paying without issues.

            • @sweBers@lemmy.fmhy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              32 years ago

              I also like the wide range of sources to pull down content and have it available vs sometimes having to wrestle with a streaming site in the moment.

          • Frog-Brawler
            link
            fedilink
            102 years ago

            Well, sure… not everyone has to self host to see what they want to see either, but my reasoning remains the same. The people signing up and paying for Netflix all of a sudden likely lack the aptitude or don’t care enough. I got a sandwich yesterday that was > $12.

            • El Barto
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              Funny on the topic of sandwiches.

              Two weeks ago I decided to make my own sandwiches and coffee, and all of a sudden I have $200 extra a month.

        • The strange thing, to me atleast, is that you can even just stream shows and movies on websites like bflix with subtitles for every language. I have friends and family that would pay netflix their left leg if they asked them to. And now they’re stuck with a bunch of subscriptions to multiple streaming services because everything is split between multiple platforms.

          • Very_Bad_Janet
            link
            fedilink
            82 years ago

            Is there any risk to streaming movies in bflix? Do you need anything special to use that site (like a VPN)? There is a little knowledge barrier to doing things like this.

            • Honestly not really. Torrents expose your ip directly to everyone downloading and uploading the torrent. But only the website itself sees your ip. Companies will join the torrent and add your ip to a list. Then ask your isp to send you a notice. With a website, companies cant see who is watching on a streaming website.

      • pips
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Well, why would they ditch for piracy? Netflix was smart about the whole thing: adding an authorized household (not user, entire household) is cheaper than creating a new subscription. The people subscribing to Netflix aren’t fundamentally opposed to paying for streaming, they were opposed to an unfair change in the business model. Netflix countered with a seemingly fair change in the business model that now eliminates the hassles that come with password sharing and could make the marginal increase in cost per household fairly small. It was overall a pretty smart business decision.

        There are many many problems with Netflix, including their growth-based business model, the lack of insight into their finances, and the way they’re slowly enshittifying the film industry. They’re a major reason for the WGA and SAG-AFTRA strikes. However, this change wasn’t stupid and people weren’t stupid for going along with it. I don’t see how it would lead to an overall increase in piracy, that’s being driven by the many new streaming services forcing costs on consumers. But consumers won’t blame Netflix for that because, frankly, that’s not Netflix’s fault.

        • @Coreidan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          Dodging lawsuits? Bruh you sound like you’re scared.

          No one is going to come after you with lawsuits because you’re pirating movies. Worst case scenario your ISP ends your service after sending you a dozen warnings over the time span of a year.

      • @GCostanzaStepOnMe@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I find it a tad arrogant to believe costumers can’t make rational decision that differ from those of the vocal online minority of reddit et al. Whenever a website changes its product (arguably for the worse, most of the time) said minority prophesizes the end, and calls out some kind of revolt, whereas the vast majority of users or costumers customers just makes due with the slightly worsened conditions, simply because they still see the product as worthwhile. Netflix, for all its flaws, still is a decent product for a decent price, as long as you’re into the kind of slop they produce. And there probably is a large portion of costumers customers who weren’t even affected at all by the recent changes.

      • Chainweasel
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        I kept paying for a little while, until I had ripped everything off their site I wanted to see, then I cancelled lol.

          • Chainweasel
            link
            fedilink
            52 years ago

            Yep, I got a program that had to be subscribed to for about $30usd a year that allowed me to rip up to entire seasons of shows in 1080p at a time through a logged in account. I accumulated about 3TB of shows and movies then cancelled My subscription to both Netflix and the program I was using.

      • kratoz29
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        My GF pays for Netflix and other than some annoying messages and text account sharing is still possible, not as cool as before though.

        Anyway, as she does not have the premium version, or whatever is called (no 4K) good quality picture films we end up watching them on Stremio lol.

        She doesn’t care, but I do.

      • @x1gma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        942 years ago

        The difference is, that Netflix (or Spotify, or whatever) does bring value on its own. I am paying money to comfortably and legally stream content, which itself is paid for and licensed by the streaming provider. From the perspective of a lazy end user, it’s worth it, because you do not need to care about downloading, finding releases, opsec and whatnot. I don’t want to protect Netflix, fuck corporations and subscription services, but password sharing was always only tolerated at most. From the same end user perspective, reddit is just an empty platform. The content is brought in free of charge by the community. And now not only they want the same community to pay, but also for an objectively worse experience? I don’t think that you can compare that.

        • @Elderos@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          202 years ago

          Agree with you, but small nitpick, password sharing was encouraged at some point, at least from the PR side of the business.

          • kratoz29
            link
            fedilink
            62 years ago

            Yeah let’s not be like, “poor guys, they needed to get rid of password sharing”, if we start to agree that they were never encouraged that’s how people forget stuff.

      • @lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        That’s not really how averages work, that’s the median, but I get your point. In order for that to be average there have to be scores lower.

          • tool
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            His mind’s gonna be blown when he finds out about Mode averages.

  • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy
    link
    fedilink
    432 years ago

    £5.99 a month…

    i cant believe people actually pay that for what is essentially a forum.

    it’d probably be decades before they made that off me in advertising.

    They could have had my money too if what they were asking were reasonable and i retained the ability to use RIF

    • @bamboo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Yeah if they made it so that you had to pay $5 per month or moderate a sub with >10k subscribers to keep using third party apps, none of this would happened and they would have been able to make more money off of it.

      • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        $5 a month is still a lot imo. i’d do $12 a year ($1 a month billed annually or 6 monthly) which is still an order of magnitude larger than the amount they would get from advertising for me

        • @bamboo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Yeah $5 is a bit much for what it is. I picked that number because it’s the upper limit for where I’ll go “fine have money just don’t bother me any more”

  • @couragethebravedog@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    -962 years ago

    I would probably pay tbh. I hate my home screen looking bad. I’m on Android and use custom icons, but if I had no other options I’d pay for it.

  • @Trolled@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    232 years ago

    what are you guys talking about? an r place themed icon wasn’t put there to get people to pay money? it was put there because there is gonna be a new r place. this isn’t some evil plan conjured up the criminal mastermind u/SPEZ that you just uncovered.

    • @Bliss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Yea, I was reading the comments here and people really think anyone gives a flying fuck about how ugly the app icon is? It’s clearly for r place. Still, fuck Reddit for doing r place just to gather traffic again, but this article is just silly.

  • @schmensch@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    182 years ago

    While we all hate reddit, them changing the app icon to make a reference to what used to be a fun event shouldn’t be our main point.

  • CandyRushSweetest
    link
    fedilink
    212 years ago

    I can’t believe they push third-party devs away and then try to make Reddit as unappealing as possible! Like, I used their stupid app and I CAN’T HANDLE how much that stupid app LAGS!! If they want people to pay, they better be a damn good app. Like, this is just evil at this point!

    I’m just saying, but Reddit is just becoming a money grab. I appreciated third-party devs because they made Reddit more enjoyable. My favorite app to use Reddit on is no longer effective due to Reddit’s changes. That’s why I’m on Lemmy now :/