• Dr. Coomer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    So, is it that number 4 is supposed to be $4 or that you order 4 number 4’s and only have to pay $4?

    • kismatticOP
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Haha sorry if the title is confusing. The meal is supposed to be those specific 4 items that you pay $4. Guess it would read more correctly as “4 for $4” but I was dumb and said for $5 since their pricing is deceptive. (Sorry if you’re just making a joke and it whooshed over my head 😅)

    • kismatticOP
      link
      fedilink
      281 year ago

      $5.35 after taxes. I just want answers on why it’s wrong and Wendy’s will never answer me 🥲

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In your county. Taxes here (Sacramento, California) are 8.75%

        Not that we’d begrudge a few pennies from a Wendy’s purchase.

        You don’t get to keep your 4 for $4 marketing when you raise it to $5. It smacks of capitalism desperation.

        • kismatticOP
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Yeah I’d be fine if it were just the tax, but literally marketing something one way and charging a 25% markup is just false advertising. Either change the name of the deal or change the price.

          Am I petty for making such a fuss about $1, hell yeah, but is it annoying that “value” meals from every major fast food chain are going up while keeping the same name/title, absolutely

  • Tangled Slinky
    link
    fedilink
    711 year ago

    Is Wendy’s still doing the sassy Twitter (now known as “X, formerly known as Twitter”) schtick?

    • Ghostalmedia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      251 year ago

      If you hate yourself, open threads. It’s 90% Wendy’s ads.

      • If Only
        link
        fedilink
        121 year ago

        To be honest this lemmy post is also a Wendy’s ad.

        • kismatticOP
          link
          fedilink
          141 year ago

          Not my intention, I’m trying to make the point of not purchasing from them due to deceptive pricing but it is still essentially free marketing. Not sure how to bring it up without that being the case

          • "no" banana
            link
            fedilink
            71 year ago

            I think calling it an ad is a bit dishonest tbf. If you’re of the mindset that all marketing is good marketing, then companies suddenly cannot be criticised because it’s advertisement.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          yes I have seen a meme and now I have a need to go to the nearwst Wendy’s, gonna just walk there real quick however many thousand kms that is

    • kismatticOP
      link
      fedilink
      211 year ago

      Yes! But now they’re also on Threads, I would’ve put this on Mastodon if they existed there

  • Ghostalmedia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    501 year ago

    Threads, social media for people who wish it was mostly Wendy’s ads.

    • kismatticOP
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      Yeah it’s definitely bloated with companies just trying to act witty or like they’re people. Mastodon is infinitely better in that respect. Ive just been dumb trying to get more outreach for the social stuff I’ve been trying to do 😣