“Systematic reviews of controlled clinical studies of treatments used by chiropractors have found no evidence that chiropractic manipulation is effective, with the possible exception of treatment for back pain.[8] A 2011 critical evaluation of 45 systematic reviews concluded that the data included in the study “fail[ed] to demonstrate convincingly that spinal manipulation is an effective intervention for any condition.”[10] Spinal manipulation may be cost-effective for sub-acute or chronic low back pain, but the results for acute low back pain were insufficient.[11] No compelling evidence exists to indicate that maintenance chiropractic care adequately prevents symptoms or diseases.[12]”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    412 years ago

    Quick reminder that Physios and Chiros outside America face different rules for accreditation, and may not warrant similar judgement.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    442 years ago

    One of my best friend’s fathers was an MD before retiring.

    The cadaver he used in med school: broken neck during an “alignment” at a chiropractor’s office.

    Anecdotal evidence for sure, but definitely a story that I think of whenever someone talks about going to a chiropractor.

  • Wrena of Delpan
    link
    fedilink
    132 years ago

    Generally agree with this, but one time when I was little landed on my back on the edge of a trampoline and really hurt my back. After some back and forth my parents took me to a chiropractor who fixed my pain, saying I probably moved a disk onto a nerve or something like that.

    So I think pain caused by physical movement of the spine like my injury is totally legit as a reason to go to one

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    Uh, yeah, having had several accidents resulting in vertebral subluxation or a rotated SI joint that was only corrected and relieved by chiropractors, whoever came up with that conclusion can fuck all the way off.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Vertebral subluxation isn’t a thing. Chiropractors made it up. You might have had a dislocation, but subluxation is oogy boogy words.

      Chiropractors DO have some evidence that they can provide short term, immediate pain relief for back pain. However, physical therapy and exercise after an adjustment is necessary or you have to see a Chiro forever.

      Also a PT or DO can do the same kinds of manipulations with an actual medical degree.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Thanks, your interpretation is not required.

        And you’re incorrect

        https://health.clevelandclinic.org/whats-the-difference-between-shoulder-dislocation-and-subluxation

        https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559144/

        edit: and if PTs and DOs are doing the same adjustments, then the adjustments are a legitimate therapy when done correctly, regardless of who is doing them, unless you’re saying PTs and DOs are also illegitimate. Your argument is nonsense.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            I also love how the goalposts have been moved from “chiropractic techniques are ineffective and have no value” to “well actually those same techniques are effective and legitimate when done by certain people.” That is hilarious!

            What’s sad is that after 25+ years of having these arguments, you knuckleheads haven’t come up with anything original.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Orthopedic surgeon here

        Vertebral subluxation is a real thing n depending on the level, can lead to paralysis, complete or partial or death. It is not oogy boogy.

        After road accident, chiropractic manipulation might be the biggest reason for it.

    • NataliePortlandOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      262 years ago

      Thank you for sharing your story! While it’s a great example of anecdotal evidence, the “whoever” that came up with these conclusions are called “scientists” who perform research based on scientific evidence. It’s great that you feel better for having seen a chiropractor, but many do not.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        That’s also anecdotal stories, and it’s not my imagination that after attempting numerous other methods, that chiropractors were the only ones who did anything except say to walk it off or offer painkillers. You can fuck off along with those scientists.

        By the same logic, all the “real” medical practitioners whose efforts and advice had zero positive effect on those situations are also quacks, or whatever. Fortunately for them, I have more realistic experience and understanding than that.

        The only funny part about this to me is that the only advice any “real” medical practitioner gave me that helped any of these situations was to refer me to a chiropractor, after prescribing painkillers to help tolerate it until I could see one.

        • originalucifer
          link
          fedilink
          122 years ago

          you really trust yourself over the majority of scientsits and medical people the world over? really?

          please tell me you also never to a hospital or ever dial 911 for a medical emergency. they may use science on you

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            You must be partially illiterate since I’ve already said I went to doctors, and that I was recommended to see a chiropractor by at least one them, and that I experienced relief and long term correction for multiple accidents. Not just relief, but instant relief, from realigning the vertebrae from a position that created nerve entrapments. The mechanics of chiropractic and how they work is not difficult to understand. If any of these scientists were messed up badly enough to need one, they would also draw different conclusions.

            edit: and yes, I do trust my own observations about the presence of pain and its elimination from my own body. I don’t need scientists or doctors to tell me that it didn’t actually happen. I was there.

            • originalucifer
              link
              fedilink
              11
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              wow. i mean, you always read about people who just dont understand science… but then you see one in the wild

              good luck, buddy.

              you are the blood from which regulations are written

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                As far as I’m concerned, you’re the ignorant one here. If you ever need chiropractic and decide not to get it because a group of people told you it’s worthless, I’m fine with it. I don’t have to live with any pain you may suffer from in the future or your decisions how to manage it.

                And I’m not sure what you’re wishing me luck on, because due to my decision making, I’m pain free with full mobility, with exception for ringing in the ears, for which there is no cure at the moment, but I do use scientifically based hearing aids that play scientifically based disruption tones that work about 60% of the time, prescribed by my doctors and paid by my medical insurance. And I don’t avoid hospitals or other nonsense you’re projecting. Everything you’ve said is disposable.

              • Dadd Volante
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                “Science is just stories told by people who read books to make people who don’t read books feel dumb”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    52 years ago

    I recently learned that chiropractors in Switzerland are very different. They are all medical doctors and need to fulfill strict requirements so they can work as chiropractor. It is also a common thing here to go to chiropractors and I have never heard of any accidents.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Imagine hating chiropractors so much you have to downvote a true fact without spending a second looking it up yourself.

    • originalucifer
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      those are ‘licensed physical therapists’… the thing is few good things that might be attributed to chiroprators is already done by actual medical professionals… even here in the u.s.

      the difference is, we allow quacks to pretend to be ‘doctors’ here. a certain subset of the population are drawn to the homeopathic, pseudo-science nature of it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    102 years ago

    Even if they made me feel better it is so temporary that I’d have to come again, and again. I’d rather go to a massage therapist who could also get the rest of my body too without the risk of vertebral artery dissection.

    The best thing I’ve found for my back is slow, varied motions and stretches. I do tai chi and qigong and they really loosen me up.

  • Cosmonaut_Collin
    link
    fedilink
    442 years ago

    I think this depends on the kind of chiropractic work. If they are just there to pop bubbles for that crack, then nothing is happening. I got into a car accident and my insurance sent me to a chiropractor that never cracked my back. Instead he gave me physical therapy, got me MRI images to check for an cracks on my spine or hernias in my discs, and gave me some equipment to help relax my back muscles and provide support to my bacl. I feel like this kind of work actually does provide benefit. I don’t go anymore since all of that stuff is cleared up now, but I would trust that guy with my back again if I needed it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    65
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Chiropractors and osteopaths only exist in such large numbers because they bill less to insurers than actual doctors & hospitals. So of course insurers are going to promote these quacks because it’s cheaper than somebody going to an actual physiotherapist for treatment.

    There should really be legislation that requires insurers to cover science & evidence based treatments. If someone wants woo it should be at additional expense to them, not part of a standard policy.

  • nicetriangle
    link
    fedilink
    92 years ago

    I went to a chiro for a while and it did help but I think it was mainly because they’d have me do a fairly comprehensive set of stretches at the beginning of each visit. I stopped going to the chiro but I keep doing the stretches.