• Aniki 🌱🌿
    link
    fedilink
    English
    65
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s because the GOP knows that more voters means they lose. Centrists don’t exist. There’s no middle ground between Ds and Rs anymore.

    No one is 50/50 on Trump.

    VOTE

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      Centrists do exist and will always exist. Regardless how bad or good things are.

      The problems is both sides have at least 1 great and 1 terrible policy or stance.

      We need more sizeable parties options, or at least vote for them.

      That way people can vote for parties that best fits them.

      Note: voting for the lesser of two evils, won’t solve the problem. Just make things worse overall. We can all see that

      • valaramech
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        As long as the US continues to use first past the post for voting on these things, voting for the lesser of two evils is the only actual option we have. Voting independent in these races is effectively throwing your vote away at best.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 year ago

        The problems is both sides have at least 1 great and 1 terrible policy or stance.

        Well, first off there’s 3 "sides.

        1. Conservatives (almost all Republicans)
        2. Moderates (mostly Dems)
        3. Progressive (all dem, but not all Dems)

        I’d love to hear what you think is great about 1 or terrible from 3.

        Those moderates tho…

        Their entire deal is just staying the same distance from 1 and 3, regardless of how illogical that is.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              It happened under his watch, but the terms of everything were setup by Trump. Which is also why it was a gigantic fuckup.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            91 year ago

            That counts as a policy? I don’t think an individual action count as a policy. Unless the policy is “leaving any occupied territory”, but that’s not a policy of neither party.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              31 year ago

              There was also the whole thing where leaving Afghanistan was an operational disaster due to timelines put in by the Republicans who made that decision.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      There are tons of people who don’t know anything about political ideology that are 50/50 on Trump.

      • Aniki 🌱🌿
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Prove it. The numbers from the 2016 and 2020 election say entirely different.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    as if anything that happens on this world at this point is natural. 'side from fuckin, ain’t nothin.

      • billwashere
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        I really dislike all the attention Taylor Swift gets, but if this is what does it I will become a lifelong Swiftie.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I just don’t get it. I must be missing something really important about what makes her stand out as different from any other guitar-playing radio pop woman singer-songwriter since the early 2000’s. Why didn’t Michelle Branch get as popular? I don’t dislike her, just not my taste I guess.

          • billwashere
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Better media relations? No idea. She’s not that much better than other artists but her popularity and media saturation is freaking annoying.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1171 year ago

    The right is free to have kid Rock or whatever loser they have on their side, do the same things Taylor is doing, if they’re so concerned. Except all she’s doing is encouraging people to vote, which as we all know is bad for Republicans

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        131 year ago

        More specifically if a woman they don’t like does it. They like her in theory because she’s white and attractive and straight and Christian and got her start as a country singer, but then she had to go and have opinions about things, so now she’s a commie who’s destroying America, or something.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    While I don’t think it is some sort of stupid political conspiracy, I do think that she is being advertised/shilled a crazy amount.

    It feels like it blew up in less than a year. She’s fucking everywhere now.

    Edit: to the fans (or Swifties or whatever you want to be called), I’m in no way talking shit about her. I’m simply pointing out that she’s in the news a lot. Stop PM’ing me bullshit. I also don’t care about your downvotes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Thank fuck I’m not in the US. After being outside for so long, I think the advertisement-atmosphere would send me to suicide.

    • athos77
      link
      fedilink
      301 year ago

      She re-did and re-released a couple albums this year, had a massive worldwide tour, which she had filmed. The movie made $100,000,000 on opening weekend and is the highest-grossing concert film ever. She’s doing an awful lot of stuff this year, so of course she’s getting a lot of coverage.

      She also managed to completely sidestep the entire multiple Hollywood strikes issue by the simple expedient of meeting with the unions, asking them what they wanted, and saying, “Okay, you got it.”

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        151 year ago

        Yep. I’m not a fan of the billionaire class in general since I don’t think anyone should be allowed to be that rich, but she actually seems to do right by her workers, which is a hell of a lot more than you can say for most of them.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            91 year ago

            Disagree there. “Earned” implies “deserved.” No one deserves to be that rich no matter how talented or popular.

            • Rhaedas
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              Definitely a debatable subject, but if there was a line of billionaire to start taking away “earned” income, she wouldn’t be at the front. Plenty of others that are far less “worthy”, depending on how the debate of worth goes.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              91 year ago

              Earned because she worked for it herself and overcame some huge barriers. Let’s not forget what happened when she won her first Grammy. She stuck it out and built up her brand, her way. That takes incredible dedication and willpower. Now she is doing a 3 hour nonstop huge stadium show around the world while maintaining a high profile relationship with Travis Kelce. Yeah, she earned it.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                fedilink
                71 year ago

                Nope. No one earns a billion dollars. I don’t care what they overcame or how hard they worked. There are many people who overcame far worse things and worked much harder than she ever will and are barely making ends meet.

                She did not earn it and she does not deserve it.

                And if you don’t think a significant portion of that billion isn’t from investments, you don’t know how the billionaire class works.

                • Hominine
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  Redefining words and then doubling down on them to bolster your opproprium? I believe that’s what the kids call a classic reddit move.

                  It strikes close to the denial of reality you see from these right wing conspiracy enjoyers as well.👍

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  31 year ago

                  I mean, I would say that it’s far more ethical than most billionaires. She didn’t exploit workers, she performed and the populace gave her the money willingly. It’s as ethical as one can get in the modern day where no person can participate in society without benefiting from exploitation. And as far as I can tell from some half-assed searching, her investments are in property, but not in the landlord sense. She owns rich people property. Mansions and jets and shit.

                  I my personal opinion, musicians seem like the most ethical rich people in terms of how they got their money. They get exploited by the music industry early on, but money primarily comes from ticket and merch sales, which people choose to spend their money on in support of the artist. People hate capitalism, but forget what it is they hate about it and just start hating the money, forgetting why it’s bad- the exploitation.

    • BraveSirZaphod
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      In particular, her tour was a massive three hour retrospective covering her entire career rather than being focused on one new album. Combine that with a few re-recordings of old albums and her successfully getting a new generation of Gen Z fans and you’ve got one very popular star.

    • Unaware7013
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Yo harddaysknoght, I’m really happy for you, Imma let you finish but Taylor Swift has been in the industry a long time… A long time!

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      441 year ago

      She’s been a top-selling artist with a huge fan base for years now.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Oh I’m not saying she isn’t. I know she’s been around a while. But you don’t see any other artist with the amount of publicity she’s getting is my point.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Definitely. She’s a capitalist’s dream. See creates scarcity with her albums and merch, forcing frenzied buying and price scalping. She’s a prolific polluter and her dad bought her success.

      Now any criticism of her actions and business practices are met with her fans calling you a conservative or a misogynist because capitalism has melted their brains.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 year ago

      Exactly.

      C’mon now, we all know the primary thrust of their attacks/defenses is always “I know you are, but what am I?”. By far the most common. It’s used like half the time.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          No. If you call one corrupt or a liar for instance, they will not say anything like “I know I am.”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Trump says things like that all the time and gets away with it. At this point he might as well go ahead and murder that kid in the middle of Park Avenue, his followers will say it shows he’s strong, and what about Hunter Biden!?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              True. I would say he’s atypical though, most of them don’t act like that. He’s a trailblazer, is what that man is.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                31 year ago

                Yeah, usually they say the Road to Hell is paved with good intentions. But he stepped off that path long ago and is forging a new Trail To Hell over a mountain of fraud, grift, sexual assault, and fascist thugbootery.

  • theodewere
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    they blame everything they cannot understand on a conspiracy, because they are cowards

  • Goku
    link
    fedilink
    191 year ago

    While I don’t listen to her stuff intentionally, I do enjoy her tunes for the most part that I’ve heard. I also recognize her talent and influence.

    I think it’s really wonderful for her to encourage her fans to register to vote…

    The more people who vote the harder it is to maintain minority rule.

  • squiblet
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    There is seriously no end to the insane bullshit people like this think of. I couldn’t have thought of this if I tried spending hours thinking of the most ridiculously dumb theory possible.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    301 year ago

    The Democrat party can’t even advertise when Biden does a good thing properly. You think they’re smart and organised enough to run a sophisticated psyop like that?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    421 year ago

    Swift is a force of good, as much as any insanely rich person can be. She alone may end up responsible for tens of thousands of young women registering to vote between now and election day. One of her Instagram posts drove 35,000 voter registrations. Republicans have every reason to fear the Swiftie factor.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      281 year ago

      Yeah. She’s measured with it too. One of the reasons her sway is so strong imo, is she just saved it up for a long time. So when she finally asks a fan “hey could you do this one little thing for me?” it almost feels like “uh, yeah, I’ve known you my whole life Taylor, of course.”

      Which the fan doesn’t “know her” per se, but between a musician and a huge fan, it definitely feels like you do. It’s a personal relationship, a little different from most other fandoms. Music is just odd that way.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        201 year ago

        I would say that Princess Diana would be a comparison.

        Personally, I like Swift because she has legs for days. I’ll vote for that reason alone.