• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    162 years ago

    Damn, if only Spez didn’t have fucked up Reddit. I even wanted to invest in that IPO, but now I’m not going to.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 years ago

    So this is the Pluto of the internet?

    To be honest, despite the smaller community, I feel more at home in the Fediverse than ever I did in those big, bloated, commercial communities.

    • A Wild Mimic appears!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 years ago

      I would answer that with yes, because it has (video)posts, comments, likes, follows etc.

      but i agree that it’s an edge case, because many aren’t using it like social media

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 years ago

        It used to be a lot more. You were able to add friends, and video replies appeared at the bottom of the video. Old YouTube legit felt like a community of people.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        Makes me wonder how they count “active users”. Is watching a video active or just when you comment?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        The content (the videos) are also made by its users, that used to be one of the key features of social media back when the term first appeared.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 years ago

    I was reading the Wikipedia page linked just an hour ago.
    and I was surprised to see over a billion daily users on Facebook. I used to think at best that’d be in millions.

    I understand now that what do people mean when they day social media’s amplification of a certain message can have great impact. I used to take it lightly, partly because I an totally detached to any of these big platforms.

    and being on Lemmy is a wholly different experience.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Just don’t tell their investors who are clearly pushing to make it a social media hub.

        Edit: it’s the second-to-last place I would ever consider for that purpose. Right after Venmo.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      It’s pretty important career-wise, suggest this video if you’re interested.

      I, too, have a profile on LinkedIn, doesn’t mean I use it more often than once a month or something, just to check up on notifications

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      Linked in is simultaneously the most useful and useless social media platform.

      On one hand, you can use it to get jobs, and keep a line of contact with former/present colleagues in a professional setting (as opposed to Facebook or remembering to write down their personal email address).

      On the other hand, you have the feed, which is full of the most stupid, banal, and preformative shit you’ll ever see on social media, because it’s all in the name of advancing your career in this superficial society of ours.

      I hate it, but it has its uses.

  • Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    18
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    For the biggest ones: How many of those active users are bots, advertisers, and scammers? I’d guess about half on Facebook.

    Also, is it considered “active” if you have a dormant account but have the app installed on your phone and it still watches what you’re doing? What if you only use it to communicate with family because it’s the only internet they understand?

    Further, what about duplicate accounts or “secretive” secondary accounts so you can click on the depraved stuff you like without that showing in your public feed?

    I feel like the real numbers for the big ones are massively inflated by issues like these.

    The Fediverse is small enough to as of yet not be affected. Once it gets large enough, it will have all of this, too.

    • jergyOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 years ago

      For sure.

      with respect to bots, as of this time I don’t think it’s a problem that can be fully solved, although I do think over a long enough timeline the fediverse is probably the best suited to handle that problem.

      I wanted to see a visualization of the relative size comparison, so I used the data that was available on Wikipedia, but this data is approximate at best.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      The Fediverse is by design affected by inflated numbers. If one user uses three different services, the user is counted three times. However, for the Fediverse it doesn’t really matter - that number of total users is just as irrelevant like the total number of used email addresses.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Also, is it considered “active” if you have a dormant account but have the app installed on your phone and it still watches what you’re doing?

      Almost all platforms use “monthly active users” - anyone that uses it at least once per month is considered an active user. If you have an app installed but don’t use it, it doesn’t count. Some platforms also provide a daily active users metric.

    • plague-sapiens
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      Federated instances could be counted. Non-federated like govermental or company ones can’t. So yeah, I would say 3.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    I’d be interested to see how different it would look if we only counted average active daily users