I assume “Other purposes” is govt kickbacks to mining and gas companies 😬

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    102 years ago

    Nice to see our debt is being reduced. Meanwhile, the US is struggling to figure out how not to let their economy implode.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Unfortunately paying the interest on your debt is not the same as paying down the actual (principle) debt. Unless there’s something I’m not seeing.

      Edit: There was in fact something I wasn’t seeing.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    72 years ago

    Mannnn… I wish we had this in the U.S. Unfortunately it would ruin a lot of the propaganda forced down our throats, disabling some talking points for our dumbass politicians.

    They’d never give us something so comprehensive.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    442 years ago

    Eww you guys are getting close to spending more on education than the military. Slippery slope.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    182 years ago

    USA:

    Defense: |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| ||||||||
    Boomer Welfare: |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| |||||||| ||||||||
    Interest on Debt: |||||||| ||||||||
    Everything Else: |
    
    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      As yet, social security is still a SELF-FUNDING program that lends money to the general fund. I’m gen-x, not a boomer. Stop buying into generational warfare. We have more in common with working class boomers than with gen Z tech bros.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        social security is still a SELF-FUNDING program

        It’s also had negative cash flow for the last decade despite exponentially growing future obligations, and is currently trending towards insolvency by 2033. That’s what happens when you detach expenditures from taxes. So while boomers are simultaneously enjoying low taxes and reaping the benefits of social security, the fund will run out of money before it can have any chance of paying out for millennials. It’s not like the social security taxes I’m paying now are being “set aside” for me - they’re going directly into the welfare checks for my parents.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          and what’s wrong with “social services” having a negative cash flow? It’s to help people in need, that’s the entire purpose of taxes, to help the community/country. why do people think that any government systems should be positive cash flow like it’s a business? LOL

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Pretty sure they aren’t upset at the government not turning a profit or taking care of people.

            social security is still a SELF-FUNDING program

            [Insolvency is] what happens when you detach expenditures from taxes.

            So while boomers are simultaneously enjoying low taxes and reaping the benefits of social security, the fund will run out of money before it can have any chance of paying out for millennials.

            It’s not like the social security taxes I’m paying now are being “set aside” for me

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        As someone who has spent a lot of their time around wanna be gen z tech bros, 99% of people have more in common with a damn antelope than gen z tech bros, especially the fanatically devoted ones. Those guys make some Jonestown people look like they aren’t weren’t in a cult

  • irotsoma
    link
    fedilink
    102 years ago

    In the US we just all know that it’s bombs to kill the enemies of whoever the companies are allowed to sell them to, and fighter jets that don’t work.

  • SeaJ
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    Fuel and energy is also mining and has kickbacks.

  • ORbituary
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    I paid twice that in taxes here in the USA and I still don’t have proper health insurance. If I got sick, I would be destitute.

    • @[email protected]
      cake
      OP
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Yes, from a salary of about 90k. However this is federal tax. We dont pay individual state taxes as well. Our sales tax is built into the price of goods. Our healthcare is also completely free.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Comparatively, in the US a $90k USD salary is about $10,415 in federal taxes.

        However, my family healthcare is about $22k in premiums alone, for a high-deductible plan. This includes the employer-paid portion, as that is part of my total compensation package. Then there is the deductible ($5k) before the insurance starts paying out. And this is not including Medicare/SS taxes as well.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    322 years ago

    I think something like this would make U.S. citizens feel better about taxes in general, since it can sometimes feel like you’re throwing a large portion of your hard-earned money away.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      82 years ago

      true but seeing how much goes to welfare might make republicans hit the roof. Everyones got that uncle that hates the poors.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        Most in Australia don’t read where the money goes. Taxes aren’t too bad (IMO) and the system is so easy that once you submit you don’t really go back to see where it went. Or maybe I live in a bubble.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        Mind you the largest chunk of that is the elderly with the unemployed being one of the smallest ones. I’m very much in favour of both by the way.

        If you think your taxes are too high then it’s not because too much is going to welfare; it’s because too much is going to tax breaks (which won’t show up on a chart like this) for fossil fuel companies and the wealthy.

    • Dran
      link
      fedilink
      112 years ago

      The data to create this is essentially public with budget bills right? It would just take building a percentage tree and categorizing them appropriately. I might look into how complex this would be to build.