- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
it’s unclear if this factors into his ongoing indictment in the state for election interference.
I see no reason why it shouldn’t.
It’s possible that they could introduce it after a motion to submit new evidence, though the defense’s attempts to stop it from being introduced is a foregone conclusion.
I am Jack’s mounting evidence.
It’s pretty unfortunate, Thomas said, that Republican leaders offered to give them something, legal protection, for not doing their jobs.
“Offering something of value to a public official to not perform a required duty may raise legal issues for a person doing so,” Thomas said.
