In an interview with the Guardian from his home base in Burlington, Vermont, Sanders urged the Democratic president to inject more urgency into his bid for re-election. He said that unless the president was more direct in recognising the many crises faced by working-class families his Republican rival would win.

“We’ve got to see the White House move more aggressively on healthcare, on housing, on tax reform, on the high cost of prescription drugs,” Sanders said. “If we can get the president to move in that direction, he will win; if not, he’s going to lose.”

The US senator from Vermont added that he was in contact with the White House pressing that point. “We hope to make clear to the president and his team that they are not going to win this election unless they come up with a progressive agenda that speaks to the needs of the working class of this country.”

Sanders’ warning comes at a critical time in American politics. On Monday, Republicans in Iowa will gather for caucuses that mark the official start of the 2024 presidential election.

Biden faces no serious challenger in the Democratic primaries. But concern is mounting over how he would fare against Trump given a likely rematch between them in November.

  • Verdant Banana
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    if Trump wins the corps also win and the people lose

    if Biden wins the corps also win and the people lose

    did either of these two put up a fight for worker’s rights and higher wages?

    did either stand up for women’s rights or bodily autonomy?

    did either stand up and defend journalist being silenced?

    did either do anything to quell the militarized police force?

    did either help Captain Planet at all with restoring Mother Earth?

    did either candidate do anything to protest against the size of the military budget?

    what did either candidate do that directly makes the citizens better off?

    where is the difference?

      • queermunist she/her
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        https://www.huffpost.com/entry/bernie-sanders-hamas-destroy-israel-ceasefire_n_6576fac1e4b0881b7917ddab

        “I strongly support and wish and hope that the United States will support the United Nations resolution that was vetoed, that we vetoed the other day,” Sanders said. “That was a humanitarian pause, humanitarian cease-fire, that would have by the way called for the release of all of the hostages held by Hamas, and would have allowed the U.N. and other agencies to begin to supply the enormous amount of humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people.”

        However, he added, “in terms of a permanent cease-fire, I don’t know how you can have a permanent cease-fire when Hamas, who has said before October 7th and after October 7th that they want to destroy Israel ― they want a permanent war. I don’t know how you have a permanent cease-fire with an attitude like that.”

        Weak shit tbh

        Better than nothing, but it was a pause regardless of him trying to spin it as a ceasefire.

        • Adub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          The rare W for Senator Sanders right there and now he is backpedaling so his base will still buy his books in the future.

          • queermunist she/her
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            Sanders is stuck in the bygone era of Labour Zionism and doesn’t seem to realize that his statement about Hamas applies to modern Israel too - you can’t have a permanent cease-fire with a settler-colonial entity, who has made it very clear that they want to annex the territory.

            • Adub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              It is strange that the the American radical left abandoned Labour Zionism after the USSR conducted the trials like the Doctors’ plot & decided selling weapons to Arabs to kill Jews was the way to go. Solidarity is quickly dispensed with when principles are weak. Maybe Sanders error is the same as people supporting Houthis now?

              • queermunist she/her
                link
                fedilink
                2
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                The American radical left grew an anti-colonial character alongside the rise of Black Nationalism and the American Indian Movement, the breakup was inevitable because Labour Zionists were trying to build socialism in an apartheid colorismo ethnostate on stolen land 🤷‍♀️

                Without any international left holding them back, Revisionist Zionism conquered Israel and now they’re just openly fascist genocidal freaks. Sanders still thinks there’s a rational Zionist entity to negotiate with, but that ship sailed a long time ago.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    871 year ago

    I’m sure Biden and “his team” want to win, but not at any cost. Certainly not at the cost of taxing his donors and using the money to help the working class.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Even a clearly over reaching executive order that immediately gets smacked down by the courts would relieve the pressure.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        311 year ago

        Of course congress wouldn’t pass anything like that. Ultimately they all play for the same team-- Capital. The “bully pulpit” and executive orders are largely reserved for things like supporting genocide, and antagonizing our geopolitical rivals.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        Ahh yes, the classic “there’s no reason to support good policies because other people do not.”

        What a bunch of losers.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 year ago

        Lemmy is largely populated by children who lack the intellectual maturity to appreciate that democracy is about compromise and that winning elections doesn’t mean that you get to do everything you want.

        There’s this myth that somehow Biden can just wave a magic wand and get everything he wants, but he’s not doing it because in spite of being arguably the most powerful man on the planet, he’s secretly in the pocket of corporate America. It’s a very childish view of the world and is entirely disconnected from reality.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          171 year ago

          Both parties in the US are in the pocket of corporate America to some degree (Citizens United made it legal anyways), it’s just that one party actually cares about having a functioning country with a decent living standard for people and the other will happily burn it to the ground to hurt minorities and gain short-term power. What you see is the frustration in the general US population that sees the Republicans openly ruining things while the Dems have their hands tied by the underhanded tactics Republicans use and talk about “reaching across the aisle” and compromising with the fascists. Stuff gets done, but you often don’t hear about it or openly see the effects of Elizabeth Warren taking corporations to account for their actions compared to the 1.3 anti-trans laws per day that Republicans tried to pass in the first 6 months of last year.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          391 year ago

          This is an extremely common trope from establishment Democrats who like to pretend the left is just naive children. Let me make this perfectly clear to you. Yes, we get politics. Yes, we understand that Biden can’t get everything he wants. Yes, we get that Republican obstruction is a thing.

          Now, here are some things for you to try and grasp. Most of the time, Biden and the Democratic establishment is leading the opposition against the left. The establishment also plays dirty to get their unpopular candidates past the primary, then blames the left when they lose in the general.

          It’s not generally the politically active left that doesn’t vote blue. Most of us are well practiced at holding our noses at the ballot box. It’s normal non-political Americans who see no point in getting engaged when neither party even speaks to their problems.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      Who knows what’s happening in their heads… but my guess is they think that once the ‘3rd party people’ fall back in line they will regain the lead so they don’t have to worry. And the rest is Biden being as establishment as you can get so obviously he’s not interested in any radical policy changes.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s the same with the AFD in Germany. People were so busy insulting those who vote AFD and telling them how stupid they are that now even more people vote AFD. I wonder how anyone thought this was going to make them vote for a different party?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      Centerists literally screaming at people they have to vote Democrat because a vote for a third party will destroy democracy.

      These are the same people who voted for Biden in the primaries intentionally to block progressive and leftist candidates from getting elected and now they want to act like we’re responsible for propping up their garbage candidate.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    481 year ago

    With an election coming up, the Schrodingers Leftist dilemma is in full force, even on Lemmy -

    Where we’re simultaneously both powerful enough to be personally behind every Republican win of the past 20 years, and also so insignificant that we must be ridiculed and bullied at every turn to remind us that we have NO PLACE in their party they blame us for not backing.

    The best part is that most of the time people hit both sides of the coin in the same comment.

    • Grayox
      link
      fedilink
      241 year ago

      You can look at my post history and see I’m pretty far left, but I’ll be pinching my nose and voting for Joe Brandon, the reason the GOP has built so much power over the years is because their base always pinches their nose and toe the party line. Voting for the lesser evil is still keeping less evil out of the world.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        161 year ago

        Voting for less evil is still addition of evil. Everyone parrots this “blue no matter who” shit but dems have done nothing to stop fascism or serve the needs of citizens, because they benefit from those systems and citizens going without. Voting mid right instead of far right is still voting for the right, voting Democrat doesn’t stop the march to fascism, it just delays the official kick off date by 4 years as Republicans continue to seize power unchecked from the bottom up.

        I’ve always voted third party and will continue to do so cause I’m over this vote between fascism and fascism but with a rainbow pin on its cap. If Democrats wanted the votes to beat Trump, they should have run Bernie who won the primary in 2016 instead of running status quo Hillary then having a court decree that their voters are, legally, not shit to them.

        I’ve said it before and I’ll keep shouting it from the rooftops - if leftists are so fucking important to Democrats maybe they should stop dedicating their lives to insulting and belittling us. 🤷

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            “I’m so against moving away from my right wing duopoly I’m going to call the guy who’s only a few shades less right wing and has done nothing to stem the rise of fascism because his party benefits from the same mechanisms being exploited by fascists ‘oUr OnLy ChAnCe.’”

            Voting for Biden doesn’t stop fascism, it delays it for 4 years as dems continue to turn a blind eye to fascists overriding every system from the bottom up until next time.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          If you vote third party you have no right to cry when Trump win. You are as much responsible for it as anyone who didnt vote.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            If you vote Democrat you have no right to cry when Trump win. You are responsible for voting for a party that explicitly demonizes half of their supposed base as they screech at us for not voting for them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If Biden doesn’t at least say he wants to do something about housing affordability then I won’t be voting. I’ve voted blue my entire life.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      It’s not the leftists. Oh the Democrats blame it on them. But we saw this in 2016 with Hillary. It’s a hurt working class that feels like they’re being ignored.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        “leftists” is just what the centerists are willing to call us even if it’s not technically correct. The point is they blame us for not winning the general elections but outright vote against us in the primaries. It’s fucking pathetic.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          All I know is I get called a socialist all the time and I can’t get in contact with this Soros guy for my check. Seriously though, it is pretty screwed when you can tell whose going to get the nomination by who gets the party chair positions.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    111 year ago

    Dems are just mid rights who don’t care if you’d rather slave away and not afford healthcare or housing with a masculine pronoun instead of feminine (or vice versa)

  • blazera
    link
    fedilink
    211 year ago

    Yeah Biden lost me when he outlawed the rail strike (please dont link me to electrical union statement). Frankly its just been downhill from there anyway.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Biden was great until late 2022. That is also around the time a neolib became his chief of staff.

      • the post of tom joad
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I wonder how much Biden policy is like Reagan policy, just a bunch of young corpo ghouls handing documents to a vaguely pleasant rheumy-eyed old man to sign off on.

        Edit: autocorrect

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          It’s hard not to compare their administrations and I wonder if Biden looks back fondly to those days.

          Many DC Dems liked Reagan personally because he was nice to them. At least according to my college polysci lecturer who was in the Senate.

    • DarkGamer
      link
      fedilink
      151 year ago

      Don’t link you evidence that the unions themselves thanked Biden for his help and they got what they wanted without striking?

      • blazera
        link
        fedilink
        251 year ago

        he outlawed a rail strike and you want to link me a statement from an electrical union that opposed the strike from the beginning and always had sick days. And then I point out how not everyone got any sick days from this, the ones who did didnt get what they would have gotten from a strike, and outlawing strikes poisons any future union bargaining. Im tired of fuckin democrats coming in here to tell me how it was a good thing that the unions didnt get to collective bargain, they dont need any influence on labor because employers and the government have their best interests in mind.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          Most of us rank and file union members think that he did what he had to do because inflation was already out of control and shutting down the railroads risked tipping the country into recession which would’ve guaranteed a “red wave” election in '22 as well as the reelection of Trump, both of which would be far more dire for working people.

          Local 10 till I die!

          • blazera
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            damn man union members not even believing in collective bargaining. Yeah, it would have had consequences, that’s why it works. And it historically improves the economy, with increased pay for workers able to spend more into the economy.

          • Adub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            “Leftist”/Dum-Dum left yet again being the most anti-labor aspects of the Democrat party despite waving union issues around, sadly. They are so fickle and searching for some wild thing to justify quitting & trying to hand the GOP a win at a moments notice. They won’t put the work into listening to great workers like yourself & what it takes to get the job done.

              • Adub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                01 year ago

                The are reasons for strikes and goals behind them. The strike isn’t the thing they are after its a tactic for getting the deals labor wants. You have to follow the whole labor negogation and negogations didn’t end because the strike was. The only hiccup was sick days and many of thd unions got that in the end.

                You are looking for something superfical to be angry about.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        One rich IBEW pencil pusher doesn’t represent every rail worker. You know how we determine the will of that many people? Through voting and they voted against the contract Biden shoved down their throats.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Eh, Obama went hard on election stuff and so did Bill. This hubris seems recent and tied to a belief that Trump isn’t a serious candidate.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          261 year ago

          Did the same thing with Dubya.

          “That other guy is terrible” is a really bad way to go into an election.

          Neither side knows how to fix things, but one of them lies and says it does. Being the incumbent doesn’t help either, because if you do say you know how to fix things the obvious reply is “well why haven’t you done it then?”

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Neither side knows how to fix things, but one of them lies and says it does.

            I would argue both sides know how to fix things but neither one is willing to do ALL the work required … especially when it comes to re-regulating Wall St, taxing the rich across the board (like they were post-WW2), and clamping down on the billions of dollars donated through super PACs that essentially buys elections.

          • I Cast Fist
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            the Clinton campaign proposed intentionally cultivating extreme right-wing presidential candidates, hoping to turn them into the new “mainstream of the Republican Party” in order to try to increase Clinton’s chances of winning.

            Gotta love this 'murican culture of nurturing the worst of the worst then wondering why it backfires. Saddam Hussein, Osama bin Laden and the Colombian drug cartels come to mind.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        161 year ago

        That’s because the corporatists that control the messaging want some periodic austerity to keep the working class in line. “You should be happy with what we give you” or something like that.

  • @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    301 year ago

    Just a quick fyi here:

    Kudos to the Guardian for calling Trump a demogogue. At least they say the truth when no North American news source will.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      That’s just bullshit. Many North American publications have called him far worse than a demagogue. You’re saying something that “feels” right but that isn’t actually true. It’s part and parcel with how disconnected from reality so many of us have become.

      • BlanketsWithSmallpox
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Communist Trolls: The left doesn’t say enough bad shit about Trump!

        Left and center news calling him a white supremacist, neo-nazi courting, racist, rapist, cheating, fat fuck, and now smelly fascist for 8 years now.

        Suckers for propaganda: Uhhh… Biden supports Jews exterminating Muslims! I’m helping!!! Why didn’t all of America vote for Bernie! It was the evil Democrats! It couldn’t be that he was more popular and appealed to the sensitivities of anyone over the age of 40! Nor could Bernie court enough young voters to care to vote.

        This coming from someone that has voted for him every chance I got. Which was exactly once lol. Bernie hasn’t challenged him for the nomination at all. There’s a reason why, and it isn’t because he’s cowtowed.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 year ago

    If Americans can’t realize for themselves that Biden is the most progressive president we’ve had since Jimmy Carter then we deserve Trumps dictatorship. I’m not saying Biden is adequately progressive (he’s not), but can anyone name a more progressive president in the last 50 years?

    • the post of tom joad
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      bringing up the idea of voting third party is not a good choice here, huh? If i did that, i would get a lot of copypasta ‘but trump’ if i did so I’ll just say this instead:

      Since we all know we need a third party eventually, what do we think we could do to make that happen in the future? (After this election i mean, and trump disappears forever, melted by our vote power.)

      How long would we need to wait? (Don’t want to steal votes from Democrats mind you) would they’re ever be a time where that wouldn’t happen? If we asked the DNC about timing, do you think they would help us get one started? If we tried and somehow succeeded in getting something off the ground, how might both parties feel about that attempt? Would they be for or against? If they were against, would they try to crush it? If they tried to crush it, what would they do to crush it? They probably wouldn’t use force first, so maybe they’d use words. What might they say about it?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        Good questions. As with most things in society, true change has to start small. So you have to start by changing the messaging. With greater organization and messaging you start local and build a foundation. It drives me nuts that we have these conversations every 4 years about the presidency and then everybody goes back to their lives for another 4 years. Meanwhile the corporate machine is continuing their messaging that “government bad, worker’s rights/unions bad, minimum wage bad, welfare bad, education bad, stock market good”. What do you expect?

        • the post of tom joad
          link
          fedilink
          0
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah. If i use myself as a barometer of what regular people are capable of, i simply don’t have the time n money n energy to start my own campaign or put time and money into a smaller political entity, to try and build them up for the next, out even the next next presidency.

          I mean, were talking realism it would be a small party that won at the local level first yeah? Or so I’ve been told.

          So we’re talking decades. I have thought idly about how something like that could even happen over that time, and the only realistic starting point i can’t think of is a pipe dream on its own, UBI.

          I cannot think of another way the common man could compete with all that corpo monkey

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            I get it. Maybe we can all just start by changing the conversation and focus on the positive things Biden has done and encourage more of the same. The narrative is only focusing on the negatives and that will affect polling and voting.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              0
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The narrative is only focusing on the negatives and that will affect polling and voting.

              Good. Biden losing the general election is the only way the fucking pieces of shit who voted for him in the primaries will get the fucking message. Stop voting for procorporate trash in the primaries. We won’t show up for them in the general.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    13
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Call me stupid, cuz I don’t know. But why isn’t anyone challenging Biden in the media? Or even talking about Marianne Williamson’s (who I thought was a challenger) bid for the Democrat ticket?

    How do we not have people lining up to replace Biden on the left?

    • Adub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Marianne is the one who had letter drafted from her staff to take her race more serious & focus on getting on more ballots than Iowa & New Hampshire. Huh, I wonder why nobody is taking her serious.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        15
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Media is a scary thing. Progressive ideas are so popular rn, and yet centrist and corporate donors still control everything. This election cycle has been such a slow boil and everyone seems to be tapped out already

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          Trump has both parties strangled and nobody is willing to make inroads for third parties or ending FPTP. Voters are abused spouses that aren’t willing to fuck off to the shelter or streets because it will suck.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Biden’s procorporate bullshit is what’s strangling the chances of a Democrat victory. He fucked the BBB, negotiated down on student loan forgiveness, argued with us about how much stimulus money he campaigned on, blocked the rail strike, signed off on Yellen and Powell’s war on the working class, gave a handout to corporate America with the chips act and continues to support Israel against wishes of the voters he depends on.

            If Biden loses it’s because Biden is a piece of shit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Because it would be a good way to ensure a Trump victory. I hate that it’s come to this, but unfortunately it’s the reality.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    91 year ago

    To be fair, attention span is short. Anything the administration does too early before the election will be completely forgotten by November.

    • DarkGamer
      link
      fedilink
      131 year ago

      This is the problem, Biden is a historically pro-union president and people don’t seem to recognize it. His appointments to the national labor board are responsible for the resurgence of unions were seeing.

      • Adub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Rare sane voice in the mass of users that shift with the whims of the GOP.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Can’t pass up an opportunity to blame progressives and leftists can you? It’s not that Joe Biden is a procorporate piece of shit. No no, it’s those young 40 year old kids with their tiktoks that are the problem.

      Get real Boomer. Biden was a terrible candidate and anyone who voted for him in the 2020 primaries is a selfish piece of shit.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Didn’t single out anyone. Attention spans are low across the spectrum.

        I didn’t vote for him in the 2020 primary. I’m all for election reform to move away from FPTP and the lesser-evil voting strategy it necessitates. But as it stands, voting is FPTP in this election, so I’m definitely going to vote for the proto-corporatist over the fascist, and I’m going to encourage actions that make the fascist staying out of power more likely.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Whatever you say bud. You can complain, or play the hand you’re dealt. Can’t do much about it not. If you disagree with what happened, get out ahead of primaries next time and promote the candidates you like. If more people vote for another candidate, that’s just democracy.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Buddy, if you didn’t vote for Biden in the primaries who did you vote for? And why aren’t you willing to acknowledge there was no good reason to vote for Biden in the primaries?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                I voted for Bernie, but alas he did not win the primary. More people voted for Biden, so he did. That’s the hand we are dealt.

                I’m only saying there’s no benefit to complaining about it now. Biden is shitty, but Trump is shittier. So it goes.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 year ago

                  So are you willing to call out the people who voted for Biden in the 2020 primaries for the selfish pieces of shit they are?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2271 year ago

    Every once in awhile I catch myself thinking about how different the world would have been if Bernie was president and it’s just so fucking sad.

    I get that all the other problems would still exist, but there would be a glimmer of hope to cling on to.

    • SatansMaggotyCumFart
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      A significant portion of the US population think Biden is a communist, how would Sanders have a chance of winning enough votes?

      There’s a reason Trump fought so hard to have Bernie as the democratic nominee in 2020.

      • HACKthePRISONS
        link
        fedilink
        131 year ago

        a significant portion of the US population thinks trump is a fascist, how would he have a chance of winning enough votes?

        there’s a reason hilary fought so hard to have trump as the republican nominee in 2016.

        am i doing it right?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          251 year ago

          This is the most upsetting part, he fucking won, and we still have to live with the consequences of the GOP blatantly stealing the election

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      451 year ago

      Remember when debbie Wasserman shutlz stole the dnc nomination from bernie to give it to Hillary?

      That one rug pull gave donnie the win.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          101 year ago

          With an election coming up, the Schrodingers Leftist dilemma is in full force, even on Lemmy -

          Where we’re simultaneously both powerful enough to be personally behind every Republican win of the past 20 years, and also so insignificant that we must be ridiculed and bullied at every turn to remind us that we have NO PLACE in their party they blame us for not backing.

          The best part is that most of the time people hit both sides of the coin in the same comment.

          • iquanyin
            link
            fedilink
            41 year ago

            i read this same exact bunch paragraphs earlier. why is it here again?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Centerists, or people who voted for Biden in the primaries tell progressives and leftists we’re minority viewpoints within the Democrat party. Implying that we have no business trying to influence the direction of the party. These same centerists also blame us when their garbage candidates don’t win in the general election and tell us things like “Biden was a good compromise” or “You got pretty much everything you wanted” despite neither of those things being true.

              Centerists got so comfortable winning elections on their own they forgot how to compromise and accuse anyone else trying to negotiate as “throwing a tantrum”.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      481 year ago

      I do wish he had been president, but I also wonder how much of his agenda he could have gotten past congress, even if Democrats were in charge. Most Democrats are, at best, about preserving the status quo and I hate having to vote for them just to stop the people who will make things even worse.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        201 year ago

        I voted for Bernie every chance I’ve had, but I genuinely doubt he could have achieved the current level of success much less something better.

        Without a Congress full of like-minded people, it would have been a struggle. I think we can have someone like Bernie for president one day, but it’s people being passionate and engaging with every vote and every election.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Undoubtedly they would’ve sabotaged Bernie every chance they got, just like the labour party sabotaged Corbyn in the UK. Both of those parties are glad they only had to sabotage during the elections.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1321 year ago

      I voted for Bernie and he would have been great, I always find myself thinking about Gore winning more often. I have more respect for Bernie for sure but we’d have been in such a better place by 2016. Jesus, there’s a non-zero chance that the 9/11 warnings don’t get ignored and the US definitely doesn’t invade Iraq or Afghanistan. The housing bubble would probably still have burst in a bad way but I doubt it goes down the same way. Supreme Court wouldn’t be as full of neocons and zealots.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        I always find myself thinking about Gore winning more often.

        We might be thinking about Biden winning his second term as Nazis take over the US in the future - Get your friends to vote

      • FlashMobOfOne
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        His EO’s alone would have accomplished more in one term than any Dem since LBJ.

      • Rhaedas
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        It’s possible we’d be in a better situation now. Lots of obvious things like not tossing out known facts about terrorism efforts and having a climate change awareness leadership. There’s much that would still be the same, like the system of consumerism that is the core of much of our problems. One person in a limited power seat can’t fix that, I’m not sure anything can outside of failure of the system itself. But I do think we would have at least avoided that one historic turning point that revved back up the military drive of the US. Even GWB’s administration was looking into ways of reducing the military into smaller, more mobile parts until suddenly we went into revenge mode. Or useful crisis mode.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        171 year ago

        Yeah I think with gore we’d’ve had a good chance of being the world leader in switching to green energy right around when hummers got popular instead.

      • Dark Arc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        541 year ago

        Not just that if Gore had won and 9-11 would have still happened we would have likely seen a push away from oil starting in the early 2000s. I think Gore could’ve turned that into an opportunity to say “to hell with these middle east authoritarians and their oil, we can do better for ourselves and better for the planet.”

        Unfortunately I was 6 when 9-11 happened so I didn’t have much say in these matters.