• Alien Nathan Edward
    link
    fedilink
    English
    241 year ago

    conservatives are really good at arguing against what they imagine leftists to be and really bad at arguing against what leftists actually are

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1381 year ago

    Turn back stranger. This thread is full of people arguing about history and political theories without any clue about either.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        To be fair… soviet Russia should’ve absolutely steamrolled Germany with even a half decent leader.

        Stalin almost let Hitler win by being just about the dumbest fucking leader on the planet. And that includes whatever idiot was leading the French.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        15
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I would agree Mr PP Boy, but my self proclaimed communist friend from childhood loved Stalin. And last I ran into him he was reading Maos theory. Guy was 27 years old at that point too.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          26
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          At what age are you supposed to stop hoping for a more equal world and start cheering on the billionaires destroying the planet? I’m in my 40’s and I might be a little behind.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            171 year ago

            Stalin and Mao are not the kind of people you follow when you want a more equal world or you’re seriously misguided.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                A tankie is every bit as real of a leftist as an anarchist or demsoc imo. Tankies suck balls, no question. But to say that they’re not true leftists is kinda dumb. A typical convinced tankie well and truly believes that they are fighting for equality and the path towards communism.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Uh huh.

                  Explain where socialism is best enacted through genocide, imperialism, and the creation of a rigid and often hereditary heirarchy.

        • Annoyed_🦀
          link
          fedilink
          511 year ago

          That logic lol. It’s like me saying my american friend read mein kampf and love hitler, thus all american is nazi.

          • Maeve
            link
            fedilink
            381 year ago

            Tbf a lot of Americans are Nazis.

            Source: Am American

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                41 year ago

                Henry Ford was just the Elon Musk of his day. An exploitative asshole pretending to be a genius when all the actual work was done by other people.

                The Model T was not designed by Ford, it was designed by other engineers. But Ford did at least start his own company, unlike Musk who bought Tesla from other, smarter people.

                • Henry Ford also wrote a series of books titled “the international jew” in which he spew antisemitic shit and crazy conspiracy theories.

                  He had his own newspaper to publish anti-semitic ideology. High ranking German Nazis including Hitler considered him an inspiration.

                  Saying he was “just the Elon Musk of his time” falls on short on how fiercly Ford was anti-semitic, how he systematicall contributed to the ideological framework for anti-semitism and spread it among the Americans and the people in the world.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1111 year ago

          So for those of us following along at home, you know a guy who believes a thing, therefore you have applied that belief to all people who proclaim to believe a different thing?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            8
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            And his friends. And the people in the Marxist Leninist instances here.

            Also, another really smart dude I talk to regularlu, he says he would consider himself a Marxists. Probably not a Tankie, but still says stupid shit saying that the war un Ukraine is the US fault and its a result of NATO expansionist. Which is wrong for so many reasons. And his grandma was a communist China apologist.

            Communism is stupid, and the people that follow it are dogmatic and have no pragmatic basis for their “theory” other than their feelings. If it offends go cry about it.

            • Maeve
              link
              fedilink
              231 year ago

              I’m not even sure he knew a guy. A lot of people see someone reading something and assume all kinds of wild things.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                Oh trust me, thus person is very real. My conversations were so frustrating, he was so entrenched in his dogma it was like talking to a religious person.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                141 year ago

                Exactly! Just because I’m reading volume 27 of “Sheep Fornicators Extreme - Global Takeover!” doesn’t mean I’m into sex with sheep, I just appreciate the skill it takes to draw it so well.

                • K0W4L5K1
                  link
                  fedilink
                  71 year ago

                  That series gets wild with volume 32 “Sheep Fornicators Extreme - Mars Meltdown” I haven’t been able to put it down

    • Maeve
      link
      fedilink
      711 year ago

      Yes because all reds support Stalin, like all fascists support trump. Please.

  • d00phy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    561 year ago

    Isn’t “getting owned” basically this douche’s job?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    161 year ago

    Please tell the world about how awesome communist rule is while in a free democracy. Please let those starving people in those concentration camps in China know how good they have it.

    Please go on. Enlightened us.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      151 year ago

      You think that a commune can’t have voting? Well that says enough about your level of understanding. Would you really like some light on the definitions of words, or do you think you’re just bringing some slam dunk “haha commies bad” you learned from your grandpa?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      531 year ago

      Communism doesn’t automatically mean authoritianism. And you think China isn’t capitalist? Enlighten yourself bozo.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        Lol yes, abolishment of private property and government ownership of the means of production doesn’t automatically mean authoritarianism. How could I forget? To control a government best thing is to give them more power, gotcha. Thanks for clueing me into your logic steel trap dawg

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Oof. I know it’s hard to get educated but it’s worth the effort. I recommend starting with a good encyclopedia. Unless those are simply far right dog whistles in your brain

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              61 year ago

              Communism, political and economic doctrine that aims to replace private property and a profit-based economy with public ownership and communal control of at least the major means of production (e.g., mines, mills, and factories) and the natural resources of a society.

              (Encyclopedia Brittanica)

              So I looked it up on an online encyclopedia and it looks like communism is public ownership, not government ownership.

              I’m not a communist so I might be missing a detail here or there, but this really doesn’t seem like it says anything about state ownership, especially considering the fact that a shorthand definition for communism that my communist friends love saying is “A stateless, classless, moneyless society where goods are distributed from each according to their ability to each according to their need”

              Since it seems like you are certain about communism being authoritarian, here is an excerpt from the same encyclopedia (under the dropdown for “what is communism”)

              However, over the years others have made contributions—or corruptions, depending on one’s perspective—to Marxist thought. Perhaps the most influential changes were proposed by Soviet leader Vladimir Lenin, who notably supported authoritarianism.

              I know many communists love to tie Lenin into communism, but it looks like this encyclopedia indicates that some people think differently about this!

              If only getting educated was as easy as a fucking google search, and was almost no effort, instead of speaking out of your ass on something you don’t understand and blind opposition of prevented you from starting with a good ol’ encyclopedia.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          My authoritarianism comment was in refrence to the “free democracy” comment, homie. Sorry if you need those things spoonfed to you. And state ownership doesn’t automatically mean public ownership. China is a real world example of that. Thanks for clueing me into your idiocy, dipshit.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        China really isn’t. They gotta jump through some wild hoops to do business over there. Apparently the way they exchange value between companies is via some share of inventory for sales or whatever. It’s complicated AF, so I don’t know how to explain it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          281 year ago

          Julan Du and Chenggang Xu analyzed the Chinese model in a 2005 paper to assess whether it represents a type of market socialism or capitalism. They concluded that China’s contemporary economic system represents a form of capitalism rather than market socialism because: (1) financial markets exist which permit private share ownership—a feature absent in the economic literature on market socialism; and (2) state profits are retained by enterprises rather than being distributed among the population in a social dividend or similar scheme, which are central features in most models of market socialism. Du and Xu concluded that China is not a market socialist economy, but an unstable form of capitalism.[18]

          That’s from a Wikipedia. I’m not going to pretend to have a strong grasp on it but it’s state owned enterprises that function, essentially, as private (separate from government). That combined with production for profit > production for use makes it way more in the capitalist spectrum compared to Marxists ideology. Especially considering their human rights record.

    • deaf_fish
      link
      fedilink
      231 year ago

      Well, it’s not a fair argument but non-communist countries have starved a lot more people to death than Communist countries ever had, but something tells me you’re not really here to learn anything or that you care for fair arguments.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      381 year ago

      lol with how the last few centuries of politics have turned out imagine unironically still being a rightie in 2024, that’s pretty embarrassing

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          171 year ago

          I mean if you wanna be a dumbass that’s your choice bro, you can keep getting fucked over by daddy government as you please. But don’t come crying to leftists in a few decades when the world’s on fire and your entire life is in ruins lol.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              Preach. All the Society Experts here have come to a conclusion- based on the hardest of evidences - that Democrats are the only good ones they just aren’t left enough. Notice their unwavering homogeneity- it’s not groupthink or any kind of propaganda campaign, it’s just how the Lemmy MENSA brains operate. Why make room for tolerance of dissenting opinions when you just like know you’re totally right?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              18
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              you unironically believe that a failed murderous ideology that has led to nothing but poverty, famine, tyranny, violence, and eventually collapse

              Capitalism? Rates of poverty are unbelievably high, starving, tyranny, and violence is too, and extremely capitalist countries are in a constant state of collapse and go into recession every few years causing mass starvation, homelessness, and death. As opposed to even shitty communist countries like the USSR or PRC where they were far better off after communism than before communism, even being authoritarian they still had way better standard of living than when they were extremely capitalist & imperialist. Even Cuba, a small island with a dictatorship which has been cut off from most of the world for a large part of its history and has technology outdated by decades, is doing better than some Republican strongholds in the US, which is pretty embarrassing for a country with as many natural resources as the US.

              And even if you don’t want to consider that, there’s pretty much any democratically elected socialist governments which the CIA immediately assassinated & overthrew, which had extremely high success and standards of living increases. But I guess if your democratic leader’s head gets blown off during an artificial American-led coup, that counts as a W for capitalism, aye? Entirely orchestrating uprisings in most previously friendly Latin American countries, Iran, etc. and turning them into authoritarian fascist shitholes certainly is a way to make your ideology seem like the only choice.

              Capitalism has caused the deaths and suffering of billions. We have seen dozens, hundreds of capitalist regimes fail tremendously, bringing their entire population down with them, multiple times the amount of communist countries that have even existed. Capitalist countries have caused the worst disasters, the worst famines, the worst mass deaths, far more than even the worst communist regimes somehow. Yet you think you can point to the failures of the few communist countries in history and say that it’s proof your flavor of fascism is totally better than leftism.

              I’m not even a communist. I don’t like communism, I don’t like any of the authoritarian regimes that followed a variation of the ideology, I strongly disapprove of the people who think the ideology of Lenin, Stalin, Mao, etc. was in any way at all sustainable. But my God it takes a real idiot to not be able to see how modern right-wing capitalism is just as bad if not worse than even those shitty ideologies, the difference being that capitalism has been given infinite chances to fail under the pretext of “oh tens of millions died from this one event but it’s fine, that’s just normal market fluctuation”. You can’t even call the US a democratic country at this point, it’s an oligarchy for the ultra-rich. Even pointing to other capitalist countries you can see that them partially implementing socialism has made them a far better place than the US, even if still heavily flawed by the capitalism.

              is going to totally work this time despite the mountains of evidence that it is a failure in both theory and bla bla bla

              Lol yea bro these leftist policies are totally failing in, say, Finland or whatever Euro country is of your desire. Countries that rely on very leftist socdem ideological views which Americans would call “socialist” or even “communist” and have much better equality & standard of living than the US, solely because of those ideologies. Isn’t it funny how the further left these countries go, the higher their standard of living and general success, and the further right they go, the more unstable and worse off they become. For example some select places in Europe have tried tasting right-wing ideology for recently and are paying the price for it (e.g. Germany, Netherlands, Italy). Crazy coincidence, isn’t it.

              I’m sure the massive political unrest, attempt to overthrow the government, hundreds of mass shootings, worst healthcare in the developed world, record garbage education, even worse starvation than China and Ukraine, extremely high crime rate, and everything else the US is going through is a sign of a successful ideology. And similar thing in Canada & to a lesser extent the UK. I’m sure it’s those damn communists causing all the issues, if we stray further to the right surely we’ll stop all that nonsense!

              The current systems are flawed

              “Flawed” is an understatement.

              but a parasitic ideology that’s just as bad, if not worse, than fascism is not and will never be an acceptable solution.

              You are delusional

              There’s a reason why brainless morons cower together in some no name echo chamber like this and larp about revolutionaries.

              Looks like r/conservative lost one of their losers. You clearly don’t like this forum, so you can cry on your Reddit echo chamber about how everyone on there is a communist, then whine about people brigading your sub when a people disagree with your opinion, but nobody falls for it here lol.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Weren’t you just telling me how your right wing parents would’ve approve of our… arrangement?

  • Leraje
    link
    fedilink
    English
    811 year ago

    Outsmarting Piers Morgan is about as difficult as obeying gravity.

  • BringMeTheDiscoKing
    link
    fedilink
    English
    501 year ago

    Piers Morgan blocked me on Xitter, back when I had an account there. It was the highlight of my brief time on that platform.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    741 year ago

    When they sacked Clarkson for hitting a producer, I was like: But he also punched Morgan, shouldn’t he, like, get one free for that?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      I am amused by the fact that Piers Morgan is so daft that he manages to piss off a guy who fellates his car and bike loving commie hippies.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      181 year ago

      He called him a “lazy Irish cunt” when he punched the producer for not being able to magically produce a restaurant quality steak at midnight.

      Idk if you know anything about old gammon pricks, but that wasn’t a simple observation that the guy was Irish.

  • Flying SquidM
    link
    fedilink
    451 year ago

    Remember when Piers Morgan came to the U.S. and everyone hated him here too, so he slinked back to the UK?