• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    man i hope he buys reddit and runs it into the ground. he seems to be really good at tearing down social media companies.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 years ago

    Hmm, black and white design. Seems coincidentally appropriate. Though if he adds some red in there he’ll have enough justification to have his employees wear uniforms designed by Hugo Boss.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1242 years ago

    So let me get this straight. Musk bought Twitter for 44 billion, fired most of the staff, destroyed bunch of features and functionality, scared advertisers away and now changed the brand’s name. Wouldn’t it be less hassle to just start a platform and pay people $100 each as a sign up bonus?

    • wjrii
      link
      fedilink
      642 years ago

      That’s absurd! Assuming 4 billion in actual startup costs, at the purchase price they could only afford to do that for…

      four hundred million people. LOL.

      Jesus this was a dumb transaction.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 years ago

        Damn, this comment thread was a level of enlightenment I was not expecting this morning 🤯

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        262 years ago

        Just for perspective, the U.S. population is 300 million. Add on the 67 million population of the UK and you still have plenty of change left over.

        Jesus, this was a stupid decision.

        • wjrii
          link
          fedilink
          102 years ago

          Yup. Four hundred million is more than the entire daily userbase of twitter.

    • athos77
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      Copying my comment from another thread:

      But they’re not just re-branding. Twitter is now under some kind of corporate shell company. I haven’t seen much coverage of that, but my suspicion is that it’s intended to act as some kind of insulator to contain Twitter’s debts.

      Like when they break a company into pieces and put everyone’s debts and no assets into a single part and then that part declares bankruptcy and all the debt magically goes away, leaving everything else with lots of assets and no debts and a future that looks really rosy. I can’t help but think that this is something similar to that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 years ago

      There are currently ~366 million Twitter users.

      If Musk paid each person $100 to start using “X” instead, he’d spend $36.6 billion, leaving him with $7.4 billion to actually build the rest of the website and infrastructure.

      Yup, he’s stupid.

  • Televise
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The weird thing is that x.com sometimes loads into Twitter and sometimes doesn’t, which shows that there’s really no management in all of this.

    • ozebb
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 years ago

      It’s not that weird, it’s how TTLs work.

      When your computer wants to know what server x.com is, it (oversimplifying a bit) asks its own internal DNS (Domain Name System) resolver, which asks your router’s resolver, which asks your ISP’s resolver, and so on, until an authoritative resolver is found.

      Each of those resolvers, before asking the next one, has its own memory it can reference just in case it gets asked about the same address very often, because asking can be costly in terms of time (because you have to ask the next server for the answer OR because so many different request are coming in that it’s difficult to answer all of them). This memory is called a cache, and everything stored in that cache is given a Time To Live (TTL).

      When a resolver that knows the answer to “what server is x.com?” is found, it gives not only the answer, but also a guess at how long that answer is valid. That guess is the TTL for the next server’s cache. This number is controlled by the owner of x.com.

      What all this means is

      • If you expect that x.com should always resolve to the same server, the TTL should be very long (because you want the resolution to be served from the cache, meaning it’s faster)
      • If you expect that x.com will change in the near future you want the TTL to be very short (because you want resolutions to reach your authoritative server and get the new server address)

      And what THAT means, relative to this particular bit of current events, is that somebody fucked up. If this change was well-planned, then the TTLs would’ve been shortened in advance of the server switch, giving time for the downstream resolvers to clear their caches.

      But that didn’t happen, which means that when your device asks “what server is x.com?”, it sometimes gets the answer from the authoritative server (updated correctly to point to Twitter) and sometimes it gets the answer from a cache (pointed at who knows what).

      Basically, Elon once again rushed some shit through and sure enough it’s a fiasco.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 years ago

        The middle X is a nice reminder to press either the left X or top-right X and make it all go away.

  • ArugulaZ
    link
    fedilink
    1952 years ago

    You’ll remember that name, because the moment the site appears, you’ll click the little X on the top right corner of your computer screen to get rid of it.

    • sab
      link
      fedilink
      822 years ago

      I took it for a spin.

      1. x.com
      2. Do you want to sign in with Google? -> press X
      3. Sign in on Twitter -> press X
      4. 404 page not found -> press X on tab

      It’s anything but inconsistent.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    Thank you, Elon, absolutely genius business decision! I was really put off using a website with a highly recognisable and long lived brand, finally this solves the biggest issue I’ve had with Twitter since the takeover. It was such a huge issue before that it eclipsed everything else, I don’t even think there are any other glaring issues. Can’t wait to log back into Twitter now after this! Oh shit I mean … X or whatever.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2692 years ago

    “We’re expect folks will go along and stop referring to ‘tweeting’ and go with the more brand appropriate term of ‘x-creting’ from now on.” Musk said before adding, "‘X-cretions’ and ‘x-creted’ are encouraged too.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 years ago

    This seems like it’s a ploy just to get attention and traffic. Seems that it’s working as I’m seeing it in all the news sites.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Maybe. I mean they got a page load from me just to see if x.com would redirect. IDK if that’s the desired effect though.

      They just killed many years of brand loyalty IMO.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    232 years ago

    This is wild, a significant percentage of Twitter’s value was its brand, and this guy has just slapped an X on it and changed the colour scheme to dark mode. Do people actually still use Twitter?