The gun the deputy said Casey Goodson Jr. was waving when he was shot in the back multiple times was found in the man’s kitchen with the safety on, the prosecutor shared publicly for the first time.

  • WHARRGARBL
    link
    fedilink
    79
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    A federal judge has paused the lawsuit against Meade and Franklin County until after the criminal case. The officer had argued that simultaneously defending himself in both cases would put him in a no-win situation.

    It seems a “no-win situation” is being Black while bringing sandwiches to Grandma’s house.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      301 year ago

      simultaneously defending himself in both cases would put him in a no-win situation.

      What is that even supposed to mean? He has to prove that his actions where justified. How is his a no-win situation? Is his plan to first argue that he’s innocent because he wasn’t trained correctly and acted out of fear and then claim in the second case that he actually received proper training?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        Civil cases have a lower standard of evidence, and fifth amendment protection is weaker. Defendants can end up in a situation where they have to say something in a civil trial that then kills their defense in the criminal trial.

        On the flip side, if the criminal trial gets a conviction, then the civil trial is a lot easier.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Defendants can end up in a situation where they have to say something in a civil trial that then kills their defense in the criminal trial.

          What could be example of something like this in this case?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        Seems to me like it would make more sense to want the cases to go simultaneously since the civil case can use any evidence and admissions from the criminal case.

        If they are tried at the same time, there is a chence that would not work because of deadlines to submit evidence.

        I have no idea what that argument is supposed to be.

  • Syo
    link
    fedilink
    15
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Cop, “Your Honor, the sandwich is a known lethal weapon, given its track record of choking hazard. Just last week, Joey down at the station, was working OT and eating his favorite meatball sub. That could have been the last time I saw Joey… So, when I saw the sandwich, I immediately recognized the danger and risked my life to control the situation.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The sandwiches were subs, they could have surfaced and started launching nuclear missiles at any moment.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      “He had multiple sandwiches so he was clearly a threat to others as well as to himself. I’m so grateful that I was there to prevent anyone else from getting hurt.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Clear intent for distribution. And where did he get those keys? From Al-queda? Possibly. There’s no way to know at the time. It was all very suspicious.

        And when I pulled out my gun and pointed it at him, he started running. Clearly he had a guilty conscience, why else would you run?

  • SeaJ
    link
    fedilink
    8
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m sure the NRA will be putting a lot of resources to help get the officer convicted since Goodson had a license to carry. /s

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    291 year ago

    I can understand why the deputy did what they did.

    You never know when a sandwich could go off.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    711 year ago

    Goodson did not heed warnings to stop and drop his weapon

    Does she mean the sandwich or the keys?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      181 year ago

      We need a system where they can’t turn it off by themselves. Let them call someone to remotely to request it off for a specific period of time if they’re taking a break. “Hey, taking lunch, can you pause it for an hour?” This is easily solvable, but police accountability is not a problem that the police want to solve.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        101 year ago

        The NYTimes Daily podcast did a recent piece on why bodycams haven’t had as big of an impact and it sounds like a big part of the problem is that even if video is recorded the police retain custody so it’s super easy for them to bury the footage. I don’t know why it’s not standard operating procedure for an unrelated body be the ones to maintain custody of the bodycam footage.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 year ago

          Because they don’t want to be held accountable, they just want to keep getting away with murder and assault

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      This one wasn’t wearing a camera. How that could be the case in 2020 is beyond me. I just assumed they all have 'em now.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1231 year ago

    Meade was not wearing a body camera at the time, so there is no video evidence of the shooting.

    Straight. To. Jail.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      731 year ago

      The law needs to be if they don’t have their bodycam on and operating, they aren’t a cop at that moment. Anything they do without it recording is their actions as an individual citizen and therefore not protected as the actions of a law enforcement official. Of course there is a litany of other reforms which need to happen as well, but I feel like this would be a simple but major one.