• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181 year ago

    Netflix should’ve realised this would be the end result. The moment you needed 5-6 different streaming platforms to watch all the movies and tv shows you want, was the moment it became easier and significantly cheaper to pirate the content.

    None of the big companies that decided to cash in ever stood a chance.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    Honest question: could some of Netflix’s enshittification be because of the media industry, and not their fault? The fragmentation of streaming was the opposite of what they wanted. So maybe his point is that it’s impossible to compete because the industry is so powerful and greedy that they couldn’t hold onto their monopoly. Spotify has been able to hold onto theirs because record labels hold less power and don’t want to get into the streaming business.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      the enshittification is just the visual media version of the end-stage capitalist cashgrab we can see across the board. Weird how they think hoarding money will save them, when the collapse they work for will make money worthless.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    161 year ago

    It really isn’t because Netflix did it easily in the 2010s. But then, as always, capitalism got in the way and we are back to the cable era where even if you pay, you still have ads.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    164
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Piracy isn’t even free! People pay thousands of dollars for hardware, and hundreds per year for electricity and various service providers.

    But they actually get what they want for that money: Being able to watch whatever you want, anytime, on any device, in high quality and without ads. It must be really hard for streaming services to compete with features as futuristic as that!

    • quirzle
      link
      fedilink
      731 year ago

      Seriously. I’m running a Synology with 12x16TB. That’d buy a bunch of months of streaming services…but this way actually gives me content to watch that I want to watch.

        • quirzle
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          RAID6, one big storage pool. On that one, the bulk of it’s usage in a single shared folder for video, though I do have another carved out for a VMware datastore for the homelab, though it’s mostly just there for somewhere to stick VMs when I’m updating DSM on the smaller DS9220+ (4x8TB in RAID 5).

        • quirzle
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          I’ve got a DS920+ on a shelf, and she’s super jealous of the Rackstation.

    • QualifiedKitten
      link
      fedilink
      191 year ago

      I think many people may view those sort of costs differently than the monthly subscription costs of Netflix, etc. Hardware is generally seen as a “one time” cost, and the added electricity costs are difficult to tease out from all the other variable electricity costs.
      My personal argument is that I pay a monthly subscription ($15/mo) for a seed box, which is roughly the same cost as subscribing to a single streaming service.
      Back before the password sharing crackdown, I had access to my parents’ Netflix account, and every once in a while, I’d try it out, but I’d always quickly get annoyed and would finish watching whatever I was watching via my Plex server.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        The difference is that we own the hardware. We can treat it as bad/good as we wants and we only have ourselves to blame if things go wrong. It also costs exactly the same whether we use it for 1 month or 100 years.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    501 year ago

    Bullshit. Make it reasonably priced, fast and easy to access, no bullshit, clean interface, no ads, great customer support, and I’ll rip this parrot right off my mother lovin shoulder.

  • m-p{3}
    link
    fedilink
    English
    341 year ago

    Hey Netflix, you need to compete on price AND the service offering. Make piracy feel inconvenient compared to paying and subscribing and you’ll retain the userbase that is willing to pay. You’ll never get those who aren’t willing to pay no matter what.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As long as Netflix doesn’t do 1080p on Firefox and reduces their price considerably and gets rid of stupid limitations on account sharing and ads, I’m never paying for it. Same for games with DRM. I’m not suffering from DRM bs when I can pirate the same without DRM. Why should i pay these asshole companies more and be more restricted than a pirate lol.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    CuriosityStream: “In light of the compelling consumer proposition, piracy services are subject to rapid global growth”

    They really are just copying this statement lmao, I actually did try to find their content elsewhere since there’s no way I’m paying for a streaming in USD, but couldn’t, don’t remember which documentary it was.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    961 year ago

    “We successfully competed against piracy and drove it to near-extinction, but now that we’re enshittified we can’t compete with piracy while continuing to make the obscene amounts of money that we want to make”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      It’s not just the enshittification of their own service; it’s the fact that so many audios decided to pull their content and set up their own enshittified services.

      Now, if I want to watch stuff legally, I have to have a bunch of subscriptions, and we’re back to where we started from.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    261 year ago

    Netflix, steam, and Spotify got me out of piracy. Companies who owned the IP just decided they all wanted to replicate what Netflix did without understanding that it was impossible for more than one company to accomplish that.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s possible for more than one companies to thrive in streaming space. Just look at music streaming industry. There are healthy competition there with several global music streaming apps and various regional/country-specific music streaming apps. All they have to do is not locking contents behind exclusivity deals and compete on price and features instead. Also, not cracking down too much on family sharing usage also helps.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      the entire industry: “…and also fragment our offerings across a dozen different subscription services.”

    • Chahk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Also Netflix: “Let’s cancel all the popular series that we hyped up all last year because they are too expensive.”