• RubberDuck
    link
    fedilink
    English
    381 year ago

    And once he has the numbers he will just sell it again

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      Probably true, though the protocol is open source and can federate, so potentially has a lower blast radius next time as people can just bail to other ATProto servers.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Not yet, at least not officially. I believe some people have tried out the open source code, but I’m not aware of anything active right now.

          They say at the end of the month, but we all know how trustworthy those promises are.

  • Aniki 🌱🌿
    link
    fedilink
    English
    331 year ago

    Fuck billionaires. Mastodon never had limited sign-ups because you’re not a product on it.

    FOSS life!

      • Corgana
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Arguably the best ones. Because you know their moderation is on lock.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    joined awhile ago, I found the lack of hashtags frustrating - it limited discoverability, unlike on Mastodon where I just follow dozens of hashtags

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    141 year ago

    I feel like the hype already died down quite some time ago. I know a few people who made an account, but this is the first time I heard the site mentioned this year. Same with Threads.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Yeah, even before this people were having a hard time to give away their unused invite codes.

  • magnetosphere
    link
    fedilink
    151 year ago

    This might have been interesting a few months ago, when they were getting the kind of free publicity that CEOs would kill for. Now that the momentum is gone, though, nobody cares. They took WAY too long to get their shit together.

  • vojel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    Oh this remembered me of that I do have an account since last year and just used it to argue with some fan boys about if Bluesky is full FOSS or not (it’s not)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    431 year ago

    Not really federated so far, right? They talk a lot about being open, but (when) will they be really? Can I sign up for an account that intereacts with Bluesky through any other provider?

    I mean, I signed up, it seems interesting enough. If nothing else it has some recognizable accounts to follow, better network effect than Mastodon.

    • Mossy Feathers (She/They)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      There is some federation, however most instances that I’ve seen are people’s personal instances because in the past you’ve still needed a bluesky invite to federate with the main instance. Now that you don’t need an invite anymore I’m sure that’ll change and you’ll see more public 3rd party instances popping up.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t follow it very closely, but as far as I know, they are the only one implementing the open protocol they designed (which doesn’t interoperate with ActivityPub). However, there seems to be some efforts for creating a bridge: https://www.docs.bsky.app/blog/feature-bridgyfed

      As you said, there are some recognizable faces and that may impact the adoption. But not being compatible with ActivityPub is a real bummer.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      Sounds like they are saying (later this month) you can create your own Bluesky instance…but will they ever federate outside that?

  • ZILtoid1991
    link
    fedilink
    81 year ago

    Yay, a “good” guy with a company will stop a bad guy with a company!

    All hail Jack!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      Just curious, why is that a deal breaker? It seems like a mild form of anti spam protection, potential 2fa backup, and a way to uniquely identify users.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        It requires personally identifying information to login. That’s a hard pass for menu people.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What I’ve long been curious about is whether the service provider can derive a subscriber identity using the number. I mean of course the mobile network operator knows I’m me, but does Bluesky? Or is it merely a valid mobile number to them?

        • RVGamer06
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Unless the network operator or the ISP sells/gives your identifying data to Bluesky, that can’t happen. It should be super illegal ofc, but in the US anything can happen…

  • mesa
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    It would be better for them to use Activity hub or at least hook into it. Leverage Mastodon/other services.