OpenAI CEO Sam Altman is in talks with investors, including from the United Arab Emirates, to raise between $5 trillion to $7 trillion in funding. The goal, according to a report in The Wall Street Journal, is to increase the world’s chip manufacturing capacity and enhance AI capabilities.

The fundraising efforts are part of a broader strategy to address OpenAI’s growth constraints, particularly the scarcity of AI chips needed for training large language models like ChatGPT.

Altman’s proposal is said to include forming a partnership with investors, chip manufacturers, and power providers to finance the construction of chip foundries, which would then be operated by the chip manufacturers.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    That’s a big ass lemonade stand right there. Hey! I need a pair a boots!

    …here you go sir!

    What? That’s lemonade!

  • Optional
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    I dunno, I see his picture on an article and I expect it to be bad news.

    And it is.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    201 year ago

    I’m not pretending AI isn’t useful. There is plenty of field where AI helps. But, AI has been the next scam after blockchain, crypto, NFT…

    It’s the end of our civilization with falling capitalism. But, capitalism will try to find new ways to make short term profits. We moved from fordism to post-fordism with the enslavement of the cognitive abilities. We entered the next era with all these scams. And entshitification is a symptom of this.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      If only someone could have predicted this long-term crisis of profitability within the capitalist system to which no permanent solution existed!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Exactly, my job is easier now with chatGPT, not because it’s better at doing my job, it just drafts ideas faster than me. As far as resource usage goes I’m all for it

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    Ah yes, open “ai”…where we parse as many webaites as possible, rank them internally by keyword usage and or views, then have our “bot” spew that shit at you

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    At this point I wouldn’t mind them accidentally creating Skynet and killing us all in a nuclear inferno, just so we don’t have to listen to any more insufferable, grifting techbros.

    Max Zorin had the right idea about silicon valley.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    176
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’s fairly bold to ask for ~6% of the total world economy as well as a sizable chunk of the world’s energy.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1241 year ago

    The fundraising efforts are part of a broader strategy to address OpenAI’s growth constraints,

    see…we just can’t grow without TRILLIONS OF FUCKING DOLLARS

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      maybe just “they” can’t.

      probably a bad idea to put those with already too many recource usage, who are living on the cost of society for uncountable generations, in positions to decide anything. maybe.

    • bunnyfc
      link
      fedilink
      231 year ago

      i have a business case to become the major player in the chip industry: buy the planet’s economy

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Between this and saying they couldn’t operate if they fairly paid authors, I’m getting the feeling that Altman might be as talented of a CEO as Spez and Musk.

      That is – if anyone else was making decisions, the companies would be vastly more successful.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    581 year ago

    Could that level of investment ever be recouped in any other manner than by replacing vast numbers of workers and their salaries?

    • MxM111
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Yes, think about how computers had multiplicative effect on productivity. The same may be possible with AI.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      That’s how productivity growth is achieved, a smaller amount of workers do the same task.

      Or course, the created wealth is again invested back eventually and new products/services require new jobs.

      For example, right now we have some of the highest labor participation in years, despite rising productivity

      • bunnyfc
        link
        fedilink
        14
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        yeah and productivity increase has decoupled from wage in 1980, while productivity rises wages stay the same - why should anyone who’s not a multimillionaire find that acceptable?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Why would anyone know this fact and attack productivity increases rather than its being decoupled from wages?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      281 year ago

      Well, see, if we grind down 8 billion people into a nourishing slurry with a shelf life of a century, that should be worth at least $1000 a person, with inflation. That’s a 50% profit on your investment!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      241 year ago

      That’s my question; presumably the people in charge of that much wealth aren’t total fools and will be wanting to see some actual numbers and a business case as to how they will see a return, not just platitudes and enthusiasm.

  • Laurel Raven
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    Oh, they’re not asking for much, just more than the GDP of EVERY COUNTY IN THE WORLD OTHER THAN THE US AND CHINA