The association, founded in 1876, condemned legislation that would threaten librarians and other educators with criminal prosecution for possessing “obscene” material.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    261 year ago

    More apt is that knowledge and learning is a threat to “their” particular brand of democracy. So let us hassle and hobble libraries (with the ultimate goal of shutting them down) under the pretext of “obscene material”.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    Funny that the association was founded in 1876 when that’s the century being emulated by banning “obscene” material.

  • FenrirIII
    link
    fedilink
    741 year ago

    What happened to freedom of speech? Personal accountability? Basic fucking parenting?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Authoritarians want to watch us poop and have intercourse. They also want to count how many times we masturbate. That is the authoritarian sickness.

    • Kalkaline
      link
      fedilink
      391 year ago

      Let’s not pretend censorship is new. People who are old enough remember Tipper Gore and Frank Zappa arguing over music censorship.

    • iquanyin
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      the oligarchs who run the country don’t want those things…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      What happened to freedom of speech?

      Doesn’t apply to school libraries. Would you be okay with having Hustler magazines at your local library?

      Personal accountability? Basic fucking parenting?

      What kind of parenting are you referring to? Do you expect parents to hold their kids’ hands all day at school?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I didn’t see any school do that. That’s not the point. The point is, if it were in schools, would that be considered “freedom of speech”?

          And if not, then we’ve established that “freedom of speech” does not protect pornographic content in children’s public libraries.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              31 year ago

              It’s relevant because the question is not about what type of books are being “banned” but whether “freedom of speech” preserves the right to stock whatever books you want in a public school library.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                If hustler releases a text only version of their magazines, that should be allowed.

                There is no reason to restrict information.

                There is a reason to restrict nude pinups, as there is not an educational purpose to them, they are entertainment.

                There is no reason to restrict non-sexual depictions of nudity.

                There is no reason to restrict sexual depictions of nudity, if the depiction supports a narrative of conflict resolution, safety, or another educational purpose.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  31 year ago

                  If hustler releases a text only version of their magazines, that should be allowed.

                  In elementary schools? With children. Well that’s certainly an interesting take.

                  There is no reason to restrict information.

                  Strange, all sorts of other information is restricted from children by law…

                  There is no reason to restrict non-sexual depictions of nudity.

                  Some of these books have graphical depictions of sexual acts. I’m not sure why anyone would think that’s something important to have in a school library or programme.

      • iquanyin
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        i expect them to trust their kids and not try to micromanage the entire country because the don’t.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Wait, so are parents supposed to have “personal responsibility” or are they supposed to “trust their kids”?

          • iquanyin
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            are those mutually exclusive? i didn’t find them to be. as with every single thing, you have to be attentive and responsive to the actual kids and situation. those change as time goes on…

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              I don’t know, really. You speak in vague generalities and I don’t know what you’re actually trying to say.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Authoritarians want to watch us poop and have intercourse. They also want to count how many times we masturbate. That is the authoritarian sickness.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    111 year ago

    “Hey we have this commercial library opening up you can read books by the chapter renting each chapter is really inexpensive.”

    I can see the writing on the wall.