• AnyOldName3
        link
        fedilink
        241 year ago

        A riot on your own is just a tantrum. There’s no point of you’re not organised.

          • Refurbished Refurbisher
            link
            fedilink
            81 year ago

            I’m convinced that the CIA is somehow causing the American left to be unable to organize, because with organization comes power, and the left having power would mean a shift away from corporate rule.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              61 year ago

              Closest they seemed to get was the Black Panthers. So it was the FBI rather than the CIA that busted that in.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              Like by infiltrating, arresting, and executing them? It’s the FBI. You know about COINTELPRO, right? There are tons of FBI documents talking about how they did exactly that. Or like… The drug war?

              This shit is recent and still going on. I have a friend who’s an organizer. The FBI comes and knocks on his door every April just to tell him they’re watching him. This happens to every visible organizer in the Seattle area. I mean, fucking Durkan and Robert Child’s.

              The US apparatus of state violence primarily targets the left. We live under a continuous counterinsurgency program and it’s mostly targeted and keeping the left from organizing. Go read Life During Wartime and watch Trouble episode 6.

              There’s huge and well documented paper trail. The CIA prevents democracy aborad, the FBI prevents it at home.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              41 year ago

              The CIA killed socialist politician in my country.

              And I’m not some banana south-american dictature, I’m in western europe.

  • archomrade [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    I’m really not sure this is true, since it’s basically all people talk about right now

  • LeadersAtWork
    link
    fedilink
    171 year ago

    I’m currently in a discussion on here with a user who refuses to vote. Pointing out that Biden has done nothing and rule under Democrats has yielded zero change. All I want is for us to come together, vote Biden in, and then carry that momentum into his next term. Historically, us not on the Right have been rather poor at coming together for a goal. Republicans on the other hand act like rabid dogs until some smuck tosses a week old rancid steak in a direction and they all surge forward.

    Course then it’s back to infighting. Fuck me if it hasn’t gotten us all to the point we’re at now though.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      All I want is for us to come together, vote Biden in, and then carry that momentum into his next term.

      So like every four years forever?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    77
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    yeah, didn’t work in brazil, we just opened up for the right to elect their dumbass just before the pandemic started, it was grim, please do vote for the lesser evil.

  • NutWrench
    link
    fedilink
    181 year ago

    When your choices in an election are between “boring corporatists” and “100% concentrated evil” you don’t have the luxury of sitting this election out with your adorable little “protest vote.”

    If authoritarians win the next election, you won’t have to worry about voting ever again.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    201 year ago

    The problem with guaranteeing your vote is that politicians take your vote for granted. They also take it as approval of their policies (like, you know, genocide).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      151 year ago

      They don’t. No vote is taken for granted. We know this because every campaign has to do GOTV every election. If you ever worked a campaign you know that voters leaning your direction are very frustrating because they will agree with everything you say and then just not show up to vote.

      People protest to make themselves feel better. If you lean left you can just call up Democrats in Congress and tell them how you feel. They will listen.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        just call up Democrats in Congress and tell them how you feel. They will listen.

        yea the voicemail listened so well and didn’t interrupt me at all, except to tell me that there is no more room for messages.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          I don’t get this “call your reps” take I see everywhere from people arguing that it’s the best and only way to be heard when literally I have been doing it for half a decade and no. No it doesn’t. Not when elections are guaranteed whether they listen or not.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        People protest to make themselves feel better

        right, cause the stonewall riots didn’t catalyze the dying lgbtq+ movement that was originally only made up of white gay cis men “calling democrats” and trying to be respectable. sure thing bud

    • Zombie-Mantis
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      The point of guaranteeing your vote in the general election is to make yourself and your interest group an invaluable base of support anyone in the party will need to succeed in a general election. Once the party has been made dependent on your group, you can pressure them via primaries, running and voting for your own candidates, making yourself and your interest group an invaluable base of support to win in a primary election.

      We’ve actually seen this happen in real-time with MAGA, which has virtually taken over the GOP. They vote red in every general election, participate in every primary, and as a result are vastly overrepresented in the GOP. The difference of course, is they’re reactionary authoritarian nationalist, and we’re not.

      This isn’t specific to MAGA, they’re only special because we’ve been able to watch their take over of the party, and now slowly burn it down with incompetence and unpopular policy. These changes have happened to both parties in the past, many times, and in parties all over the world.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      I believe the middle ground is to vote a spoiled ballot. Which is to say, vote but leave the entry for the slots with no good candidate blank. Your participation is registered. Your approval of individual candidates is withheld. The message is loud and clear.

      However this primarily works in systems where the elections are already fair and equitable, and it is simply a subset of candidates who suck.

      The fundamental problem with the US electoral system - particularly wrt the electoral college - is that volume of participation doesn’t really matter. I can vote for Trump. I can vote for Biden. I can vote Third Party. I can leave it blank. I can not-vote. Trump is still going to carry my state of Texas, guaranteed.

      My support for the winner of the electoral delegates is implicit in residency, it is not a function of my participation at the ballot.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Volume does matter, though. It enough people vote blue in Texas districts, the result goes the other way and overwhelming turnout can even defeat the bias of gerrymandering.

        With the EC, the number of votes in any district boils down into just the winner of that district, which I think is what you’re saying, but it doesn’t negate the activity behind it. Granted, this simplification is problematic still because districts are not the same and it ignores relative district sizes. Votes still matter because we don’t know what will actually happen in each race.

        Texas is historically a pretty conservative state demographically, so it would not be a surprise for Trump to win there. That’s democracy working as it should (despite flaws) to represent as many people as it can. Democracy needs people to participate and give a coordinated equal push towards our goals, and we might be surprised by how different the results could be if we all believed in it and worked together.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          It enough people vote blue in Texas districts

          Then we’d be California. But we’re not. Republicans still beat Dems on registration alone by a good 10-pts.

          Combine that with voter caging in red districts and state harassment of voting officials in blue districts, high profile prosecution of black voters, deceptive robocalls, and straight up old fashion voter intimidation at polls, and you get a state that will remain solidly red into the foreseeable future no matter how bright blue Houston, Austin, and Dallas shine.

          Even that is predicated on Texas voters continuing to support Democrats, when Democrat elected reps - from Liz Fletcher to Henry Cuellar to Ryan Guillen - drift increasingly right-wing in their politics even as their districts gain liberal votes.

          Texas is historically a pretty conservative state demographically, so it would not be a surprise for Trump to win there. That’s democracy working as it should (despite flaws) to represent as many people as it can.

          A state that splits 60/40 on an issue, but represents as 100% homogeneous by way of elected representatives, is not “democracy working as it should”. It is a deliberate subversion of democracy, for the purposes of limiting enfranchisement and minimizing the influence of minority voting blocs.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Our version of democracy is flawed, yes, I agree. We can talk all day about what is working against us and how it looks like it won’t win.

            What I’m advocating for, though, is participating despite that. We need learn to work with the system as it is because there’s not much time to change it. Election reform, though, is my top priority going into the next presidency.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              01 year ago

              What I’m advocating for, though, is participating despite that.

              The system doesn’t value your participation when it is run by people who hate you. Ritually pantomiming democracy is something you do for your own anxiety. It has no impact on the outside world.

              We need learn to work with the system

              We need a system within to work. But the current system is actively harming its community. Working in the system means being this guy

              Election reform, though, is my top priority going into the next presidency.

              Going to shut down these awful casinos with my winnings, as soon as I hit the jackpot.

    • Camelbeard
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      What’s the alternative? Not voting so others will decide for you. Even if you don’t like both candidates, you probably hate one more than the other.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    These all feel like freakout beatings in attempt to get the voters back from the bad polling numbers of Biden.

    I’m not sure they will have the impact desired.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    Every user who makes one of these “vote for the guy you warned me 4 years ago would make trump 2 inevitable” posts is getting a block.

    It takes an unfathomable brass neck to see muslims resist genocide joe for years only for white liberals to swoop in every election year chanting “well the other guy wants to kill you faster” as if that makes your guy any better.

    Get a fucking spine or go back to reddit.