• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    261 year ago

    By Lemmy standards I’m perversely unconcerned with my privacy. But I just updated all my glassdoor info to wildly incorrect stuff (name, location, industry, job title, etc) then deleted it. Even for me this is a bridge too far.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    Just deleted my account. I hardly used it anyway, so good job pushing me off the edge Glassdoor.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    241 year ago

    I didn’t input my employer, so they just pull my email domain and it says like “Project Manager at MyEmailDomain” in my profile now. What a load of horse shit.

  • Refurbished Refurbisher
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1521 year ago

    This is one of the most obvious potential cases of purposeful sabatoge. They were probably bribed by other big businesses to destroy their reputation so people would stop using the site.

    There’s nothing businesses hate more than their workers having negotiating power, and wage transparency gives them more power than they had before. There’s a reason why it’s considered “rude” in the US to discuss wages with co-workers; I always make a point to discuss my wage with all of my co-workers, since it’s illegal for businesses to prevent that discussion.

    In most other countries, it’s the norm to openly discuss your wages; unions are also more common in other countries. It’s just standard toxic workplace cultures trying to prevent people from getting paid what they’re worth, or god forbid, forming a union.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Man, people love to make up conspiracy theories.

      The article explains the motivation, which is also bad and plausible. There’s no need to pull stuff out of your ass to explain it too.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      From the article that they acquired a professional social networking app so their intention is clearly to be like LinkedIn - real names, links, career history, “social”. They want to monetize that information to sell to recruiters and salesmen.

      So basically they’re nakedly greedy and they continue to suck. I thought LinkedIn was awful but Glassdoor is a whole new level of awful.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      25
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In what countries is it custom to openly discuss salary? In Germany and most if not all countries I’ve been to professionally it is not the norm. This is of course bad for transparency/employees and good for employers.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        161 year ago

        All of scandinavia. There are public registers where you can look up the salary of everyone for norway, sweden and finland. When these registers were introduced, the salaries were normalized across the whole population

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          In Denmark, I’m part of a union which publishes salary stats for every possible job title, management responsibility, education, in a fairly convoluted matrix. Still, this allows me to easily negotiate with companies and see how well they pay. There might be something organised by the government, but I’ve never had a need for it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I like the idea of a register a lot.

          Do you also talk about it though? I was in Denmark on business for a couple of weeks and I don’t recall there being a discussion about it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        181 year ago

        Where I live we don’t really discuss salaries and I think that mostly comes down to society being tricked into believing it’s a bad thing. However our national statistics agency has made salary statistics public, which means anyone easily check their salary range and see if they’re being underpaid. I actually prefer that to discussing with co-workers because you end up getting a much better picture of your industry.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          In my country I’m only aware of statistics published by a newspaper (source may be statista, some agency or a job portal). I find the values weird however as I earn way above the stated value for my general description. I’m in a bit of a niche however so that might work to my benefit. The statistics still feel like ‘expectation management’ to me though.

      • anguo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In China, “How much do you make?” Is right up there with “What’s your name?”.

        Pretty disarming for unsuspecting foreigners.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          Not denying that it’s legal and beneficial to discuss that. It’s unfortunately not common (yet?).

    • @[email protected]
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Or

      Think about it for more than 1 second.

      They’ve been sued for liable.

      Or

      They’re being shit and creating a new revenue stream because constant growth and bonuses

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      While I see what you are seeing, I think people will just move to the next startup.

      Also by Occam’s razor, don’t explain with malice what you can explain with stupidity

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Fair point, but I’m wondering which part you were applying Occam’s razor to - what Glassdoor did is clearly malicious!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          To the part that they were bribed.

          I think they are simply in the pipe dream that they will become the new LinkedIn

        • dustycups
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          That would be Hanlons razor. I have no idea whether it applies here.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      There is also the growing difficulty of disseminating real information from false information, but that should have been more the reviewed company’s problem than Glassdoor.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      Do you know when it became illegal to ban salary discussions in the US? All the companies I have worked for recently have mentioned it not being allowed at some point.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        431 year ago

        You cannot prevent your employees from discussing wages. It is literally illegal to do so, and you cannot reprimand people for doing so.

        Under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA or the Act), employees have the right to communicate with their coworkers about their wages, as well as with labor organizations, worker centers, the media, and the public. Wages are a vital term and condition of employment, and discussions of wages are often preliminary to organizing or other actions for mutual aid or protection.

        If you are an employee covered by the Act, you may discuss wages in face-to-face conversations, over the phone, and in written messages. Policies that specifically prohibit the discussion of wages are unlawful as are policies that chill employees from discussing their wages.

        You may have discussions about wages when not at work, when you are on break, and even during work if employees are permitted to have other non-work conversations. You have these rights whether or not you are represented by a union.

        https://www.nlrb.gov/about-nlrb/rights-we-protect/your-rights/your-rights-to-discuss-wages

          • mosiacmango
            link
            fedilink
            English
            8
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            If you get suddenly laid off after doing a legally protected activity, you do have very direct recourse.

            Judges aren’t generally stupid, nor is the national labor board. If you do a legal thing companies hate and are suddenly fired out of the blue, it’s very obvious what happened, no matter what the comapny claims. It may take time and effort, but you very may get back paid the fof the entire time you were fired.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            You didn’t get laid off because you discussed your wages.

            You were laid off because you couldn’t keep your cards close to your chest and told the company y’all had been discussing wages.

            Having the right to discuss it doesn’t mean you should do it in front of the boss.

            • HACKthePRISONS
              link
              fedilink
              71 year ago

              concerted organizing activity is protected under the law. talking about it with your boss yourself is not organizing activity. talking about it with a coworker in front of your boss is.

              this is what a job journal is for. it would prove what happened.

                • HACKthePRISONS
                  link
                  fedilink
                  31 year ago

                  the law that protected concerted organizing activity is the same that took the teeth out of the unions. i want to see that law abolished, but i’m an anarchist, so i want them all gone.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        It’s not illegal. It’s frown upon both socially and at the work culture. It makes people uncomfortable.

        Doesn’t mean you shouldn’t. Ripping farts is frowned upon/makes people uncomfortable too.

  • @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2081 year ago

    Glassdoor “may update your Profile with information we obtain from third parties”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1801 year ago

      Imagine Reddit does this next lmao one day you open up and all your real life social media are linked to your u/Lick_My_Fuckhole profile, your coworkers see you as “people you may know” on their profiles. Neat

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          The only fetish subreddit I followed was banned. There was not even any nudity.

          Fuck Reddit.

      • Admiral Patrick
        link
        fedilink
        English
        391 year ago

        Didn’t Google+ do that?

        It’s been so long since that debacle I honestly don’t remember.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          721 year ago

          YouTube did it when Google bought them and changed everyone’s unique username to their Google account (real) name

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 year ago

          Facebook did it as well, maybe a couple years after opening up to the non university crowd. Neither FB at the time or G+ years later gave any thought that their no pseudonym policies put someone’s safety at risk.

        • Zagorath
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          Google+ was a Facebook-like social media. It was only ever supposed to be real names, so no issue.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    (Ars will only refer to Monica by her first name so that she can speak freely about her experience using Glassdoor to review employers.)

    Although it’s common for many online users to link services at sign-up to Facebook or Gmail accounts to verify identity and streamline logins, for years, Glassdoor has notably allowed users to sign up for its service anonymously.

    The EFF regularly defends Glassdoor users from being unmasked by retaliating employers.

    She decided to go through with a data erasure request, which Glassdoor estimated could take up to 30 days.

    In the meantime, her name remained on her profile, where it wasn’t publicly available to employers but it could be used to link her to job reviews if Glassdoor introduced a bug in an update or data was ever breached, she feared.

    “No one has the ability to see your user profile and the contents within it, meaning no one, including your employer, will be able to see your details,” Glassdoor’s employee wrote.


    The original article contains 586 words, the summary contains 165 words. Saved 72%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Can confirm, they populated my data through a data broker at some point.

      I guess the GOOD NEWS is the employer reviews are still anonymous.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        How’d you delete your account? I don’t see anything other than the option to deactivate mine.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          Yeah, the deactivation link takes you to “delete” it, but they do have some legalese that suggests they could keep it to “enforce their agreements” among other things

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    331 year ago

    Are there any good alternatives to Glassdoor? The website and app were already hot UX garbage as it is so difficult to find salaries in other countries and figure out the currency without it bugging out frequently.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        Levels is great for the tech industry. (Possibly other industries as well, but that’s the one I am familiar with)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          For big corps and California based tech companies sure. For most other companies there’s very little data. Though I realize that isn’t necessarily their fault.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Only tech, and only programmer-adjacent roles.

          If you’re the guy who serves food at a tech campus facility it does nothing for you

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 year ago

        Blind is full of the shittiest coworkers you didn’t know you had, so take it with a grain of salt

    • plz1
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      I just went in and manually edited my display name to my previous asshole of a boss. Two can play this game. If they want to get rid of anonymous content, then let them deal with poisoned content.

      Team Blind is decent, at least in the tech sector.

    • Kalkaline
      link
      fedilink
      English
      431 year ago

      Deleted my account and then made up a fictional worker with AI who works at Glassdoor in their Albuquerque location making $5mil/year as an intern and bitching about how the pay isn’t great.

  • Ghostalmedia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    531 year ago

    Glass door used to be interesting, but this site is total trash now. You can’t do anything without creating an account and filling out a bunch of shit. That site is basically a dark pattern hall of fame.

    They probably really crippled the long term growth of that company by making stupid short term greedy decisions that killed the user experience and scared people away.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    691 year ago

    Everyone thinking this was a business blunder… People got paid a lot of money to kill this site. It served in its own small way, to give workers a bit of power in relation to employers and that was unacceptable.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      Yeah, this reeks of generic neoliberal sabotage to me. They do the same thing with unions and political parties. If anything is a potential threat to profits, it’s infiltrated and undermined.

      There’s simply no way that a team focused on employee rights does something like this. Everybody working there would definitely be aware that companies routinely try to identify and punish people for their posts. That alone would end any non-malicious plans for using real names.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 year ago

    Went to my glass door app to check and the first question was “what is your name? First last?”