You’ve gone home with a Tinder date, and things are escalating. You don’t really know or trust this guy, and you don’t want to contract an STI, so… what now?

A company called Calmara wants you to snap a photo of the guy’s penis, then use its AI to tell you if your partner is “clear” or not.

Let’s get something out of the way right off the bat: You should not take a picture of anyone’s genitals and scan it with an AI tool to decide whether or not you should have sex.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    Finally, using this we’ll be able to train AI models so we can know what super-gonaherpes looks like

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    Maybe they will use the photo to match it with doctor notes and photos medically taken of the same penis or vagina to then illegally match them to illegally obtained health records. Probably not though.

  • Blaster M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    341 year ago

    This definitely won’t be misused in any way that would completely destroy the good name of the person taking/in the frame of the image. It’s just one “probable cause” search from a bad day.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      what are the chances they build a database to blackmail any individual they want in the future and just say it was leaked

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      151 year ago

      Nah, they’d just throw up a disclaimer “Not true medical advice, consult a doctor for actual confirmation” and they’d probably be in the clear

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    201 year ago

    I could care less who sees my junk. I also would not let someone take pictures of it so I can fuck them. I’m galaxies away from being that desperate.

  • no banana
    link
    fedilink
    English
    281 year ago

    I wouldn’t trust calamari to identify anything tbh

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    141 year ago

    Some STIs, in some situations, have a visible presentation that could be detected.

    A false positive is a good thing here, a false negative is a bad thing here. There’s no way this app will not have huge false negatives.

  • JackGreenEarth
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Is it open source and offline? I would only trust that they’re not collecting all the photos people take with the app if so.

  • Kokesh
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    No more need for Ann Perkins to identify Joe’s problem.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    “With lab diagnosis, sensitivity and specificity are two key measures that help us understand the test’s propensity for missing infections and for false positives,” Daphne Chen, founder of TBD Health, told TechCrunch.

    HeHealth is framed as a first step for assessing sexual health; then, the platform helps users connect with partner clinics in their area to schedule an appointment for an actual, comprehensive screening.

    HeHealth’s approach is more reassuring than Calmara’s, but that’s a low bar — and even then, there’s a giant red flag waving: data privacy.

    “It’s good to see that they offer an anonymous mode, where you don’t have to link your photos to personally identifiable information,” Valentina Milanova, founder of tampon-based STI screening startup Daye, told TechCrunch.

    This sounds reassuring, but in its privacy policy, Calmara writes that it shares user information with “service providers and partners who assist in service operation, including data hosting, analytics, marketing, payment processing, and security.” They also don’t specify whether these AI scans are taking place on your device or in the cloud, and if so, how long that data remains in the cloud, and what it’s used for.

    Calmara represents the danger of over-hyped technology: It seems like a publicity stunt for HeHealth to capitalize on excitement around AI, but in its actual implementation, it just gives users a false sense of security about their sexual health.


    The original article contains 773 words, the summary contains 228 words. Saved 71%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!