• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    Yes, this is what happens when you take a big shit in people’s cereal. They tend to leave. I, too, could be an analyst.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      Yeah telling your advertising megacustomers to go F… themselves on TV and naming them explicitly. Wow. That’s some kind of nasty.

      It totally proved Disney right, too.

  • SolNine
    link
    fedilink
    141 year ago

    I never liked Twitter to begin with, once it became an unabashed environment for hate it was a piece of cake to close my account.

      • flatbield
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I put a question up yesterday on Reddit and got no engagement with it in like 12 hours. Maybe no one that knows anything is answering questions now. I guess we will see.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Did you try posting it on Lemmy? Wonder how good Lemmy is now when it comes to answering very niche or complex questions that old Reddit was good for.

          • flatbield
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No I did not. Financial forum her is kind of dead. Not sure what other tax related forums there are on lemmy. My question was about some specific issues related to getting an incorrect 1095-C. I think I have decided on a cousre of action now but was looking for others thought too.

          • flatbield
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            Maybe that is why I cannot see the answer. I have ublock origin enabled. :)

  • Storksforlegs
    link
    fedilink
    English
    131 year ago

    At least thats kind of reassuring in a way, that part of it is people dont want to associate with that stuff. (Though I realize that isnt the only reason)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 year ago

      I remain convinced he’s killing it on purpose. I don’t know a plausible motive, but I guarantee it’s on purpose.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        I thought that for a bit, but more and more I think it’s just extreme incompetence. Remember, he wanted X to be a thing for a long time, it’s telling that he wanted it to succeed in that he renamed Twitter to X.

      • kubica
        link
        fedilink
        201 year ago

        I used to think so too, but I don’t know if he is also bad at that because it is taking him longer than I expected.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I agree he’s killing it on purpose. Something to do with information control.

        His meeting so long at the Superbowl with Rupert Murdoch in his suite sure didn’t give me a warm fuzzy feeling.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        171 year ago

        If he wanted to kill it on purpose, he could have just shut it down. Maybe to keep the trademark he could have launched some other telecommunications service and used the brand for that.

        Elon Musk is all about convincing people to act against their best interests to benefit him. For example, look at Tesla: it has a manufacturing capacity of ~2 million cars per year. Now look at Toyota: it has a manufacturing capacity of ~9 million vehicles per year. Now look at the market capitalisation of each company: for Tesla it is still about $535B, despite some fall from the peak in 2022. For Toyota, it is $416B (which is a record high).

        So Toyota makes almost 5 times as many cars a year, but is worth 78% of Tesla? And the production capacity and value gap was even more extreme in the past? I think the question then is, what is going on?

        The answer, of course, is Musk. He is very slick at convincing investors to act against their own best interests (usually by suggesting the possibility of things that happen to have the true objective along the way, like full self-driving cars by 2018 rather than competing with existing auto-makers, or 35 minute travel from San Francisco to Los Angeles, or a colony on mars rather than competing with existing satellite companies). This is the same skill-set as a confidence artist. I don’t mean to imply that Musk has necessarily done anything illegal, but due to the similarity in skill set, and the large scale at which he operates, it would be fair to call him the most successful con artist in history. Looking at it through this lens can help to identify his motive.

        So what would a con artist want with a social network, and why would he want to alienate a whole lot of people, and get a lot of haters?

        Well, the truth is that a con artist doesn’t need everyone to believe in them to make money - they just need the marks to believe in them. Con artists don’t want the people who see through the con (call them the haters for lack of a better word) to interfere with their marks though. At the small scale - e.g. a street con, the con artist might separate a couple where one partner is the mark, to prevent the other from alerting their partner to the scam. But in addition to separating the marks from the haters, con artists use brainwashing techniques to create a psychological barrier between the marks and the haters. A Nigerian Prince scammer might try to convince a mark that their accountant can’t be trusted. A religious cult con might brainwash followers to think their family are different from them, and if they try to provide external perspective, they are acting as the devil. They try to make the marks the in-group, and everyone else, even family and friends, the out-group who doesn’t care about the in-group.

        So what would a con artist in control of a social network do? They would start by giving the con artist the megaphone - amplifying everything the artist says to try to get more marks. In parallel, they’d try to get rid of the haters. They could shadow-ban them so the marks never see what they have to say, or they could put up small barriers the marks will happily jump over, and feel more invested in the platform having done that, but which would scare off the haters. However, the marks and the haters might still interact off the social network - so the scam artist would also want to create a culture war to try to make the marks hate the haters, and ignore anything they say, by amplifying messages hostile to the haters.

        So what can you do if you don’t want a world wrecked by divisions sewn just so billionaires can be even richer? My suggestion is don’t buy into the divisions - work to find common ground with people, even if others are saying just to ignore them because they are different and will never get it, and get in early before the divisions are too deep.

    • Scrubbles
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      When the only people I saw there were the leftest lefties I ever saw… then he just alienated all of them

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      He’s making X into a “whites only” platform

      Is there some evidence of this outrageous claim or it is just something that sounded cool in your head?

    • Uranium3006
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      the death spiral is in progress, elon’s just rich so he can pay bills (or let leases go resulting in eviction…) for a while

    • HeartyBeast
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      When the “large” voices leave in significant numbers - in the UK it is used wildly by public sector and charity organisations, there are official governmental Twitter accounts, all the broadcasters have accounts.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Like when a US President was banned? Was that an example of those “big voices” leaving the platform?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        Really wish I could convince local government entities to switch to Mastodon - my local police said it was “subject to O.P.R.A.” and needed to meet retention rules (if you rolled your own…), and the state wildfire commission said they were looking at Threads :/

        So instead, both are still stuck on the platform that requires a login to see posts and filled with nazis.

        • HeartyBeast
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          I think Threads federation may actually help with. I’m trying to persuade a health body at the moment to switch from Twitter and to roll their own Mastodon instance, based on the fact that what they really want is the widget on the website, control of their data and the ability to reach people.

          Twitter has already screwed the widget with the login/authentication requirements. If
          Threads actually allows its users to see Mastodon posts, that’s a big old reachable audience.

    • FfaerieOxide
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      So at what point does/did it reach death spiral?

      It isn’t so much a spiral as it is a series of 90 degree turns.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      There’s probably a sociology theory that would apply, but my guess would be a loss of 33% of active users over the course of 6 months.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181 year ago

    At this point Musk has platformed all of the undesirables of the internet. He’s a big, blinking, neon sign that says “there are no adults in the room, do whatever you want.”

    That could be a service to the rest of us. It would be nice if, now that they’re all concentrated there, the internet could quietly agree to shadowban the entire site. Just disappear it from search results, conversation, “zeitgeist.” Let all of the toxic users keep each other busy while the rest of us enjoy a cleaner internet.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      No adults. That’s funny I consider kids to be the ones to he protected from hearing the wrong things.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    101 year ago

    I only follow specific youtubers and artists. If stray away from my specific feed, Twitter is too scary lol. I am at a loss for good social media though. It seems like most social media sites have just gotten worse over the past decade.

    I guess there’s pros an cons to it all. Pro: less time wasted on social media Con: I’ve missed out on some information that is sometimes good to know.

  • Grant_M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    391 year ago

    With so many options becoming available, increasingly less people will select the platform preferred by Nazis.