• Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    English
    211 year ago

    Don’t a majority of them also use Chrome? Because they’re going to find that their adblockers are less and less effective.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      That’s yet another reason to use a DNS as blocker, and not let your browser use DNS over https.

      I haven’t done it myself yet, but I figure that sooner or later I’ll need to update my router to block all outbound DNS that doesn’t go through my DNS ad blocker. Some devices try to use their own hardcoded DNS to get around them…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Because dns ad blocking is typically done with something like dnsmasq which doesn’t support DNS over HTTPS, though it’s easy enough to setup a resolver/forwarder that does

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Because then it can bypass your ad-blocking DNS

          DNS over HTTPS was a great idea for privacy if left in your hands, but immediately ran into the reality of intrusive advertising

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        261 year ago

        I mean… you could just use Firefox and uBlock Origin. Works great.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          DNS blocking is about the only way to block ads & tracking on things like streaming devices. You can’t install Firefox or uBlock on an Apple TV for example. You can block ads on many of the apps on the Apple TV as well as all the telemetry they try to collect with a well configured pi-hole and selected DNS blocklists.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            True, but using a computer with an adblocker and a second gen Chromecast (which you don’t need Chrome for) also eliminates that.

      • yeehaw
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        No, it’s another reason to use Firefox. A Brower that is not owned and managed by an advertisement company.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 year ago

        DNS-based ad blocking is unfortunately much less effective. It’s still better than nothing though, that’s for sure.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 year ago

          A multi-layered approach is the best approach. My pi-hole blocks advertising domains, malware domains, etc. That helps tremendously with all the “smart” devices that include DVRs, streaming devices, etc. where you can’t install something like ublock. I also make sure something like ublock is installed wherever possible.

          • yeehaw
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Yup. I’ve got DNS, IP lists, zenarmor, and browser extensions

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    Many websites, especially on the sketchy side of the internet, are completely unusable without adblockers

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    191 year ago

    I really doubt the numbers. It’s so common to see people complain about ads online, even in places like here where you’d expect most people to use adblockers.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      All adblockers are not created equally and some of basically trojan horses to let some specific ads through or track the user in other ways.

      I’ve definitely noticed when my adblocker of choice misses a youtube add or popup, the comments of that day specifically will be about how bad some ads are.

  • TXL
    link
    fedilink
    English
    271 year ago

    Highly unlikely, but hopefully one day.

    Ad blocker is kind of a sad name for a content/spam filter, a vital security tool, but that’s what we got. Especially since browsers naively didn’t include filtering and block lists by default and they only became common as add-ons.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    331 year ago

    Back in the day, major news sites like the BBC ran ads that were infected with malware that then infected computers. These weren’t shady sites like people expect you to get viruses from.

    Installed an ad blocker the day that news broke and never looked back. Ads are potentially harmful to your devices.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      The WoW forums around 2012 had a virus infect thousands of computers before blizzard removed it. It was a 3rd party ad that was spreading the virus.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        I remember that, thousands of people got keyloggers and their accounts compromised. Then Blizzard tried to blame those people for getting infected, from the Blizzard website.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    I am shocked that its that low. But I manage a website for a sports league and they want to display sponsor logos on the front page. They were all getting caught by my adblocker. When I talked to other board members, none of them used ad blockers. I debated if I should try and adjust the urls or not.

    • Notorious
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      uBlock Origin at a minimum. But I would suggest a privacy focused browser. Librewolf, Mulvad or even Brave. Browsers leak so much information about you it is easy for sites to fingerprint and track you even with an ad blocker.

      https://privacytests.org/

      I know Librewolf is working on their DNS leakage (last section on privacytests.org), but they also allow you to select a privacy focused DNS server which is nice when you’re not on a network you own, so you can’t run PiHole.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 year ago

        Pihole will also block non-browser traffic (e.g. your OS phoning home). Adblocking extensions are typically restricted to just blocking traffic of the browser it’s installed on.

        It also operates on your entire home network, so it can block junk traffic on devices that can’t run adblockers.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    Ublock: Origin plugin on each browser, and/or a proper piHole style DNS blocker. Anything else is probably capturing your data to sell.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    221 year ago

    and among advertising, programming, and security professionals that fraction is more like two-thirds to three-quarters

    Leopards, face etc

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Sometimes I temporarily disable mine to make sure it’s not silently breaking any of my layout or anything, but not using one at all? That’s bonkers.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      381 year ago

      none of my classmates or teachers use adblockers. i didn’t expect this in a university. most don’t even know what i’m talking about when i recomment ublock…

    • stebo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      371 year ago

      tbh it feels like most people I know use chrome or even edge without any extensions

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        As a quick and easy alternative, you can set it to automatically open sites in reader mode. I’ve been trying that lately and it definitely helps although also mixed results where sites block part of their content from reader mode.

        With automatic reader mode, I click to hide reader much less often than I formerly clicked to enable it

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        201 year ago

        I use a Safari extension called Purify. It’s in the App Store. Works pretty well for me.

        (I also use a pi-hole at home)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          Similar for me - 1Blocker and pi-hole at home. Then I also VPN to my home when outside to continue the pi-hole filter.

          I also use iCloud relay with non-precise location.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        At least, you can change your DNS to one who blocks ads. It’s not as efficient as uBlock origin and system wide on Android. But, it’s better than nothing.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        Can you install Firefox?

        In Firefox you should be able to install the add-on “uBlock origin”. No additional tweaking of settings required.

        With Firefox you can browse the web including pages like YouTube.

        • Neato
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          Can you use a blocker on Android or is per app the best we can do?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            141 year ago

            Tracker Control on Android works well for system-wide tracker and ad blocking, and you can configure custom blocking rules per-app. Works without root by using a VPN profile (but no data leaves your device via the VPN, it just routes the traffic through this app).

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Set your DNS servers to dns.adguard-dns.com (Settings > search for DNS). Also you should install the DDG app and enable App Tracking Protection. You don’t actually have to use the browser portion of the app for it to work. After doing these two things, ads and trackers will be blocked in every app.

          • BraveSirZaphod
            link
            fedilink
            371 year ago

            So Verizon gave you a phone for no upfront cost, and they’re shitty for making you pay for it if you decide to dash away early?

            Fascinating threshold for shitty behavior you have.

            • Neato
              link
              fedilink
              English
              211 year ago

              I can’t believe people still do that. You aren’t saving money and you’re locked in 2 years. I guess if that’s that only kind of financing you can get.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                41 year ago

                I guess if that’s that only kind of financing you can get.

                That’s exactly what it is. Look up the statistics on how many people can’t afford an unexpected $500 bill. Most people simply don’t have the money to pay out of pocket for what smartphones actually cost, so they’re stuck with exploitation, or nothing.

                • Neato
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  Seems odd because you can get fully functioning smartphones for like $200.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  31 year ago

                  As somebody who’s been purchasing my phones directly from the OEM at full price since 2016, I see this as being crazy. It’s made me realize for certain that I don’t need the absolute newest thing, and so I always go with mid-range devices. I feel like people who buy their devices outright don’t buy mini iPhones LOL. If they do, they hold on to them longer, treat them better, or buy them used. So some other fool takes the hit of depreciation.

                • BraveSirZaphod
                  link
                  fedilink
                  61 year ago

                  If the phone costs $500, they simply increase your monthly bill by $500 / 24 months = $20 a month.

                  It’s a bit more complicated than this, and they’ll likely have some interest built in as well, but functionally, it’s no different than being given a loan to buy the phone and then paying the loan off over the two years. That’s why carriers often require a credit check before doing this.

          • GeekFTW
            link
            fedilink
            English
            91 year ago

            Oh no Verizon is making you do the fucking shit you signed up and agreed to do oh no the horror!

              • GeekFTW
                link
                fedilink
                English
                3
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Oh my heart is fantastic, Suzanne, but thanks for your concern.

                I just don’t go online and complain about the terms of legal contracts that I signed while blaming the company for being the bad guys for setting forth the terms that you, again, agreed to.

                🤦

                Edit: And your downvotes mean nothing either rofl.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You can install Orion browser by Kagi and install extensions from Firefox like uBlock Origin

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        40
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        With an ad blocking dns.

        https://adguard-dns.io/en/public-dns.html

        Go down to the configure manually option and follow the instructions for iPhone.

        I think next guard is also supposed to be decent, but they won’t let you use it without an account.

        The nice thing about the dns approach is it works for more than just your web browser. There’s a bunch of Android games that are essentially unplayable without an adblocking dns.

        As a disclaimer, a bunch of sites are ramping up requiring enabling ads or they won’t let you load the content. I’m ok with just hitting back and not viewing those sites, but my MIL just asked for help removing the ad guard dns because her news sites wouldn’t let her in.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        AdGuard still works well but there are other safari extensions. At home I use eero ad blocking which works well for a maintenance free blocker.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Definitely look into Next DNS. There are also some Safari extensions that can block ads.

        I also suggest buying refurbished unlocked phones in the future instead of going for the carrier freebies which you can see are scams designed to lock you into paying for their overpriced service each month for over a year.

      • LostXOR
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Back when I had an iPhone I used Orion. It’s not perfect, but it blocked the vast majority of ads for me.

      • HeyListenWatchOut
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Some VPNs like Mullvad actually have an option in their app to block ads, gambling stuff, etc.

        They don’t catch everything, but work pretty well.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You answered better and thanks for the link. Is this a free service?

          I’m using adguard but I’ve heard the owners are possibly unscrupulous.

          • Franklin
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            That is a free service and I really like it make sure you read their website basically when you sign up which requires no login it’ll give you a unique dns entry to use as your DNS

            The reason I like this one is it’s not just ad blocking it fixing a bunch of anti-tracking and other features

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Unlike when your friends or parents might raw dog, you can put that adblock condom on their computers for them.

  • BoisZoi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    131 year ago

    Asked how likely big companies would be to abuse their data, Americans were most wary of TikTok (59 percent), followed by: Meta (56 percent), X/Twitter (49 percent), OpenAI (48 percent), Google (44 percent), Apple (41 percent), Amazon (40 percent), Microsoft (38 percent), Comscore (32 percent), and Adobe (31 percent).

    I’m surprised people trust Microsoft and Amazon more than Apple; Amazon needs all the data they can get on you to build “better” profiles on what to sell you, ties your Alexa requests to feed advertising (you can opt out) and Microsoft, especially with Edge (post advertising and services team takeover) has been trying to send everything to Microsoft to feed both ads and their AI. FFS, even Outlook warns you now that they’ll share your data with >800 “partners”.

    Apple is no saint, far from it, but people trust a conglomerate over it?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Apple

        • doesn’t have advertising as a core part of their business
        • is using privacy as a selling point.
        • pretty much every release has privacy features.

        Yes I trust them more than most.

        • VodkaSolution
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          They don’t need adv, users are locked inside their platform - so they protect their users from the outside while they use them from the inside (in the end not much different from the others)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      with Microsoft though its less of a problem for users because that would require you to daily use those applications. not many people that I know of personally use outlook, so they would be unavfevted ny outlook ads when compared to the other platforms, which they physically spend more time in.