If you’re an American, and you want to stop Trump, it’s important to be actively involved:

  • Check your voter registration - there’s been an active effort to purge voter rolls, and if you moved or changed name, you’ll need to register again anyways
  • Talk with people you know about voting for Democrats up and down the ballot. Personal endorsement matters.
  • Volunteer — it makes a real difference
  • If you can afford it, donate to the Biden campaign. Even fairly modest amounts of money from a lot of people add up to being able to hire staff and run ads.
  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    At risk of by chance being somehow miraculously reached? The climate goals will soon be as dead as the polar bears.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    391 year ago

    Will make it worse, but if you look into the harms of natural gas (AKA Methane) the USA is already doing more damage than ever with much more coming online and even more planned. Climate Town video on the subject: https://youtu.be/K2oL4SFwkkw?si=r9YNB_9FPAroQCG8.

    Trump will just make an already dire situation worse which might actually bring it all to a head sooner. Not an endorsement but more acknowledgment of the sad reality we are actually in.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      131 year ago

      Those fugitive emissions from crude gas (‘natural’ gas) are crazy! It blows my mind that it could make the greenhouse impact even worse than coal. Those methane sensing satellites are really important so what we can actually check the emissions to see how bad they are.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          My understanding is different https://theconversation.com/climate-explained-methane-is-short-lived-in-the-atmosphere-but-leaves-long-term-damage-145040

          Also, we cant afford any of it. As soon as we end up in a dustbowl situation a world war will likely be the result.

          Once nations are in wartime survival mode, carbon resuction will be out the window and I sincerely think we’ll turn the earth into an uninhabitable hellscape where everyone dies.

          Everyone. It may take a while for the last people to go, but I do mean everyone. People will construct elaborate bunker systems and try to make self contained farming centers, but the reality is that stuff is way harder than it looks and all it takes is one disease, one fire or power disaster, or one psycho to destroy the crops, whoch is likely after a hundred or so years and woop, everyone dies.

        • VeganPizza69 Ⓥ
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          it does break down… into CO2 and water vapor (also a very powerful GHG).

          All levers need to be pulled, even the methane one, as they have “eq” forcing effects which are accelerating warming, which risks accelerating more tipping points. This isn’t a situation where we can pick and choose what not to do, and ending methane emissions from fossil fuels and animal farming sector is a low hanging fruit.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        121 year ago

        Right. I really think the USA and Canada need to pull their heads out of the oil and gas executives assea and do the right thing for the entire planet. They can be the cause or a major win for the decline of civilization. We are hitting do or die inflections here.

  • Orbituary
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    TIL there are goals. Seems like nobody is doing anything meaningful.

    • @[email protected]OPM
      link
      fedilink
      131 year ago

      He’s not perfect, but petroleum is only part of it. What he’s done has been to put in place the policies which will enable future decarbonization

      • Kalkaline
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        It’s better than Republican policy, but it’s not where it could be with a representative further left on the spectrum.

        • federalreverse-old
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          That would only work if there was a majority for left-wing policy. Simply having a president who’s further on the left would not actually change that much of they have to find compromises with people who don’t care about the physical reality.

  • Dojan
    link
    fedilink
    81 year ago

    No shit. A lot more than just the climate goals will be at risk.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    Honestly I think electing him in 2016 was the final nail in the coffin of our chances to fully prevent major climate change. Now we’re 10 years too late.

    Now we need a diverse array of strategies, including but not limited to, reduction in our emissions, mitigation of effects and seeing Russia defeated in physical warfare and made to reduce their hydrocarbon reliance. Failure in any facet of the multi-modal approach now necessary will see corresponding consequences.

    Naturally, electing him again in 2024 would probably make everything much worse. Again.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      If he gets reelected I’m withdrawing my retirement savings (all 10k of it!) and going on a small last binge. I don’t necessarily want to stick around for the consequences of other people’s choices to torture & kill me.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    71 year ago

    What climate goals? I see a lot of talk about deadlines and dreams. I don’t see much to indicate that there are any goals.

    In sports, a goal is something that everyone puts coordinated and concerted effort into achieving.

    In business, a goal is something that everyone puts coordinated and concerted effort into achieving.

    If the climate “goals” that were set in the 1990s, weak as they were, had been actual goals, we’d now be planning the closure of the last pipelines, not celebrating the opening of new ones and planning for the next. We’d be planning the closure of the last oil and gas fields, not looking for new drilling and fracking opportunities.

    Sure, Trump and his ilk are going to make a show of getting in the way, but it’s not like there is any coordinated, concerted effort for them to block.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    81 year ago

    Goals are already busted. Without Trump’s help. This is just some political faction trying to push blame. It’s a propaganda piece.

    If Trump wins they can continue to pollute as they see fit. But they can shuffle the blame.

    Think about the stock holders.

    • VeganPizza69 Ⓥ
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      Trump is an accelerationist. If he wins, it’s not simply the usual BAU, it’s more.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Wow you’re so enlightened with your centricity here.

      I mean really, whats the difference between eating a turd and eating 100 turds?