• CindyTheSkull [she/her, comrade/them]OPEnglish
    36•1 year ago

    Well I’ve been trying to educate them with as much good faith response as I can muster. I considered just posting PPB, but I guess because I’m medicated, I felt compelled to press on. Anyway, I heavily quoted from this excellent site: DecolonizePalestine & their myth database. I would recommend it to anyone else, especially if you plan to argue with zionists or their dipshit water-carriers like the one in the image.

  • queermunist she/herEnglish
    63•1 year ago

    “The solution is two ethno states! That’d solve everything and definitely not lead to problems later.”

    • CindyTheSkull [she/her, comrade/them]OPEnglish
      42•1 year ago

      Well, you have to follow Rinox’s entire plan. Creating a “well-defined border” will ensure that any animosity between the two ethnostates won’t ever become a problem. Also they all have to stop having religions altogether. Easy peasy.

      • D61 [any]English
        26•1 year ago

        Just to be safe, there needs to be THREE states, the two antagonistic states separated by a third state that keeps them from being able see each other. It can’t possibly fail! inconceivable

      • joaomarrom [he/him, comrade/them]English
        24•1 year ago

        I have it from reliable sources that Rinox’s plan also has a second phase which will turn Palestine into an economic powerhouse, and here it is in its entirety: “become like a powerful nation or something like that idk”

        holy crap what a statesman

        • CindyTheSkull [she/her, comrade/them]OPEnglish
          17•1 year ago

          Truly, we should all be grateful that such a geopolitical genius has risen to solve the world’s problems. We need to put that giga-humanist mind to work on getting Russia to play nice with poor smol bean Ukraine next.

  • joaomarrom [he/him, comrade/them]English
    20•1 year ago

    wow, give this person a Nobel peace prize, right now! how could we have been so stupid? the answer was there all along! so stupid that nobody has ever tried a two state solution, and that all this time we hadn’t even considered the “simply live and let live” solution

  • FuckyWucky [none/use name]English
    42•1 year ago

    There is no need to kill anyone, yes even the settlers. Some may leave because they hate living next to Arabs, others can stay where they are.

    The solution they are suggesting, if Israel agrees (it won’t) would mean kicking out all the Jewish settlers in the west bank.

    Also making this about religion 🤦 ignoring all the Palestinian Christians who were killed or expelled.

    • YearOfTheCommieDesktop [they/them]English
      31•1 year ago

      I mean you know a lot of those settlers will do stochastic terrorism and violently resist any integration. So they might need to be subdued, and I imagine it’d be hard to accomplish that without any of them dying in a shootout or something. Plus some of them are literally living in palestinians houses, no?

      • FuckyWucky [none/use name]English
        25•1 year ago

        Yep and all the Palestinian towns which were destroyed during Nakba as well.

        There will be a need for a state lead housing project for all the Palestinians who were expelled.

        None of this factors into the ‘solution’ presented by them, millions of Palestinians live in refugee camps in the neighboring countries.

        • bbnh69420 [she/her, they/them]English
          12•1 year ago

          There will be a need for a state lead housing project for all the Palestinians who were expelled.

          For the Palestinians who were expelled and for settlers getting removed from stolen dwellings, correct?

          Edit: to clarify, I feel like I see people using home construction to dodge the issue of settler removal, pushing Palestinian refugees into hypothetical newly constructed apartment blocks while settlers get to remain in stolen homes because “it would be too violent to remove them.” Not saying you are, just explaining