County officials alert Montecito homeowners that they face prosecution, including daily fines of $850 if stones are not removed

Montecito, California, is known for being home to Oprah, a former royal family, and a stunning stretch of coastline. It’s also home to miles of trails, some of which are being blocked by residents hoping to stop people from accessing public hot springs.

Santa Barbara county has been watching encroachments on East Mountain Drive and Riven Rock Road in Montecito since at least 2022, when they sent letters to residents warning them to remove large stones.

Last month, county officials sent letters again to at least six homes alerting residents to remove the stones by 28 March or face civil or criminal prosecution, including daily fines of $850. The county insists that these roads are a public right of way.

The issue seems to be with parking at the trailhead, where a tiny lot allows for just eight vehicles. When that fills up, hikers have to park on roadsides. The hot springs contain six bright blue pools that are located 1.3 miles from the trailhead in the San Padres Forest, surrounded by a deep forest and rocky hills. It became popular during the pandemic when hiking surged in the area, and has also taken off on social media as a destination.

  • KillingTimeItself
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    just waiting for the “non-local resident drags massive boulder down road after locals block entrance” news article to pop up now

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Or you might wanna take a look at the big yellow double arch natural stone carving McDonald’s stone ad! Para pa pa pa! I’m loving it!.. Drink responsibility…come frutas y verduras. For every one minute you stare at the rock, McDonald’s will donate 1 mcflurry to a homeless person nearby. All you have to do is scan the code at the bottom of the rock, attach your GPS coordinates and heading angle, pitch and jaw, then fill in the form with your name and address, print it out, sign it, and mail it to 1800 Elm St. Zaragoza California 92322. Then just wait two to three weeks and invite your favorite homeless person. You’ll need proof of purchase and a print out of your form that you’ll need to sign once more. They may have to as you the form questions again, but don’t worry, they are used to doing that, they worked for the DMV before. Enjoy the outdoors and give a homeless a helping hand! And don’t forget this form too after you’re done with the quickie! He’ll enjoy knowing there’s someone who cares, and you’ll enjoy knowing you cared! Because who cares? You cares!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    441 year ago

    It’s not clear if the stones have been cleared.

    🤡

    More like, “we just got paid to not do anything about it”. If they wanted those stones cleared they would have brought a fucking excavator, got shit done, and fined the people responsible over $10,000 for the cost of moving them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      That’s actually exactly what is happening, the courts have ordered them to remove the rocks or be fined.

      • TryingSomethingNew
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        151 year ago

        Those are not the same. In one, the right-of-way is cleared and they are fined… but while that plays out, it’s usable.

        I’m the other. They’re paying a price to keep people out. If you’re wealthy enough, then it’s just a thing. Like paying the yard guy.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          I don’t really understand what you’re saying, they’re ordered to remove the boulders and are being fined $850 a day AND risk further prosecution which are likely to be much more severe. Not OR. They don’t get to keep paying $850 forever, they have to remove the boulders.

          • TryingSomethingNew
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            I think the capitalization should be on the word “RISK in that phrase. There are lots of delaying tactics. Let’s presume they’re going to have to pay. So why not spend the money (and then charge interest until they pay) and fix it now, rather than waiting weeks/months++? It’s in their best interests to delay as long as possible.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        It is April 10th, and they say “remove the stones by 28 March or face civil or criminal prosecution”. I didn’t read anything about real repercussions, did you?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          According to the article above us, they’re being forced to pay daily fines of $850 and may face prosecution. Given that the article is getting attention, the “may” part seems very much likely.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            Bro what country do you live in? It’s pretty obvious that they won’t face a day behind bars no matter what they do. Rich people break the law all the fucking time and never see jail.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              I hope they don’t, I want to see them pay fines with more zeroes. I want them to get charged so much that the potholes get fixed and school lunches become free. I want a new wing at the hospital funded by them but with somebody else’s name on the plaque. I hope they try to fight this for months so that they pay the $850 a day, their legal fees, and much larger fines on top of it.

              IDGAF about 10 people sitting in each blue water crevice.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      I remember when people realized it was dumb to generalize an entire group of people. I guess we’re past that now.

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      Don’t eat junk food.

      Compost. Eat the veggies they fertilize.

    • AutistoMephisto
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      Technically, we’d just need to eat one rich person. Just one. The rest will get the message. OceanGate showed us they are not immortal. Their own stupidity got them killed. After that, if I were ultra rich, I’d be very scared. Like “Let’s call up a team and come up with a strategy” scared. You see, for decades they’ve built this narrative that they are this untouchable class of beings, beyond mortals. Then OceanGate showed us that they can, in fact, bleed. You see, when a dragon is killed, we don’t mourn it’s life, we cheer the Dragonslayer. So, if I were in the 0.1%, I’d be worried about appearing very human, very quickly.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    331 year ago

    Montecito has so much money and influence that any freeway construction in the area has to avoid Montecito because they hate the noise and traffic. They are also used to getting their way. They want to be a small town of multimillionaires but the problem is that they are between a big city and a national park.

    • NielsBohron
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      And a small but significant private liberal arts college (Westmont)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      131 year ago

      Rich people seem to like to buy expensive property near nice natural resources and then try to keep those filthy poor away.

      You don’t own the beach and you don’t own the hot springs, you rich fucks!

  • Aviandelight
    link
    fedilink
    1171 year ago

    I mean the most obvious malicious compliance here would be to make a bus line that runs to the tiny little parking lot at the entrance. Nothing the wealthy hate more than public transportation in their backyard.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      a park with a ski hill near where I used to live did this during ski season because the ski hill terminated near the access road. Imo even if they just ran the shuttle on weekends it would probably be cheaper than a lawsuit.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    411 year ago

    $850/day to someone who owns a house worth an average of $7.2m really isn’t much. These people are wealthy beyond belief and can easily pay that penalty. If the punishment for bad behavior is only a fine, then the bad behavior is effectively legal for the rich.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      181 year ago

      I’m fine with the $850/ day fine for 10 days as long as on the 11th day the public is allowed to attach one of their boulders to a helicopter and drop it on their house.

    • Cosmic Cleric
      link
      fedilink
      191 year ago

      $850/day to someone who owns a house worth an average of $7.2m really isn’t much.

      ~ $26K/month, $312K/year.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          8
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I have said it before and I’ll say it again. Oprah is too powerful and, honestly, I bet she has nukes.

        • Cosmic Cleric
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Oprah could pay that annually by herself and not even notice the expense.

          I’m wondering if she would though, as it might affect her profit-making, if the politics of it went bad.

          Then again, she could probably buy California at this point.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    honestly why don’t they do a park and ride somewhere else and then just have a bus/shuttle service on high traffic days?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      321 year ago

      It’s public land, fuck those people. They can sell their house and move if they don’t like it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        While I get what you’re saying, and fuck them for wanting to hoard public resources, a shuttle here would be less damaging to the area and allow ample parking where it isn’t impacting those public resources as much. And if done right, would even allow people without cars to enjoy this resource.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    I’m trying to understand the situation, because the article is a little confusing. It doesn’t sound like they were actually blocking access to the hot springs. It sounds like they were placing boulders to discourage people from parking along the road leading to the trailhead. There are only a few actual parking spots, and once those fill up people are lining the roads with their cars, possibly damaging private property in the process. I can understand the frustration. Though suing to stop the construction of additional parking seems counter-productive.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The Guardian article links to the original SFGate article which gives a better description and picture.

      The obstructions in question include large boulders and plants placed along the sides of East Mountain Drive and Riven Rock Road in Montecito, blocking spots people would otherwise be able to use as parking before hiking to nearby Montecito Hot Springs.

      Encroachments

      The encroachments are on the right of way which allows for only certain encroachments:

      the county says that the only encroachments that can remain within 10 feet of the pavement include mature trees and “boulders historically situated onsite and partially buried 40% or more, particularly those boulders adjacent to a buried, high pressure gas line”.

      Edit: I don’t know why people get so worked up when someone parks on a public street in front of their house. It literally does not compute for me.

      • moitoi
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        In the US, I don’t understand. In other countries, it can simply be illegal.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Unless marked, you can park on the roads in the US. And it’s up to the local government, not the property owner.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            That actually varies quite a bit from state to state. In a lot of states, depending on the type of road, it’s illegal to park on the shoulder except for emergencies.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      It’s honestly just giving “we only want 8 spots so the 8 of us that live here can go, stay home poors”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      211 year ago

      Hmmm they’re blocking parking on the street and suing to stop making the parking lot bigger than 8 cars. Tell me again how that isn’t “rich fucks trying to stop people from accessing the public hot spring”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Well, that’s part of why I’m confused. The article doesn’t say if it’s the same people doing both. It might be completely separate groups. Like maybe one group doesn’t want people parking on the side of the road in front of their house, so they placed the boulders. Maybe a completely different group doesn’t care about that, but they don’t want construction crews making a bunch of noise while they create more parking.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    641 year ago

    It’s a GOOD thing we don’t TAX these Wealthy People! Otherwise they might have to give US access to the National Parks we paid for since they won’t be able to Afford the Fines!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        131 year ago

        what’s that? America holding The Rich accountable for their misdeeds?
        Well I guess there’s a first time for everything.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No fuckthat. That was the solution forty years ago. Not that the US government ever would.

        We need guillotines now. We need justice.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      The courts will be fining these individuals unless the boulders are removed, it’s already been decided on. So, to clarify, the mean taxation govment are the ones protecting people from the rich people in this situation.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        The rich and poor alike are forbidden from stealing bread?

        Except if a poor person fails to pay the fine, they get locked in a cage. The rich ‘person’ will fightbitbin court for a century, til they’re long dead.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          I’ve said this so many times now, but on top of the $850 daily fines they will face further prosecution if they don’t remove the boulders. They’re ordered to remove the boulders, they cannot make that go away with money in any legal avenue.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Uh huh. Why do they care though? Its basically an expensive rental.

            They’re not going to be punished. Thats not what laws are for. Not unless theres a mob of people with pitchforks and torches, and the parasites need to be rescued with a wrist slap and some community service.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              It’s going to become an ever more expensive rental as time goes on and I’m all for it. I hope they get drained of every drop and have to start selling properties and stock portfolios.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        201 year ago

        I hear what you’re saying, but the problem is that fines don’t affect the rich the same way they do everyone else. It’s not a level playing field.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They’re ordered to remove the boulders even while they’re paying the daily fines, so if they don’t remove the boulders they’re going to be looking at further prosecution.

          Personally, I really hope they escalate things even further so they can charge them enough to expand education or other public services. I want to see more zeroes on the fines. IDGAF about cramming 10 people in some blue water pools.

          • Aniki 🌱🌿
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 year ago

            Mate the lawyers that live in those towns will eat the township’s attempts at clawing any amount of money from these scum sucking parasites before their morning coffee cools down.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              LMAO they’ve literally already lost a court battle when the daily fines were decided, if they try to fight it again then the courts will be even less favourable out of spite.

  • Queen HawlSera
    link
    fedilink
    English
    171 year ago

    What is it with you humans and your insistence that nothing matters unless you can keep it away from those who need it most?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      While I agree with the sentiment, I don’t think it really applies in this case.

      That said, people shouldn’t be blocking access to a public area just because they’re upset about something

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          How is a hot spring something that people NEED to use? You’re acting like it’s a necessity of life to go use it. It’s not. And the people using it are poor? That’s a pretty damn big generalization you’re making there to try and further your point.

          They still should NOT be blocking people’s access to anything, but don’t turn this into something it’s not. The destination and their wealth aren’t what matters here. They’re pissed that there are more people around and trying to do something about it. This is a common theme with any tourism heavy area.