“There’s no ambiguity about the data,” said Gavin Schmidt, a climatologist and the director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies. “So really, it’s a question of attribution.”

Understanding what specific physical processes are behind these temperature records will help scientists improve their climate models and better predict temperatures in the future.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    It’s 3D printing… All those people getting cancer giving resins at home for 3D figurines and other useless items. That must be a large blip in some toxic item polluting the environment right now.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            This has not always been the case, nor does it have to be now. I’m not what has to be done to get government officials on board, but if that doesn’t change soon the future looks pretty bleak.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            101 year ago

            Dont know why people are downvoting you. If it doesnt make money then it wont make change.

            This isnt a fairytail. We arent promised a happy ending.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              51 year ago

              The majority of fairy tales (as told throughout human history) do not have happy endings. They were typically told to teach or reinforce hard social truths to prepare young people for the world. The “fairy-tale ending” is really an anachronism of modern, capitalistic story telling. Happy fantasy sells, and reinforces myths that benefit the elite, such as upward social and financial mobility (see Jane Austin, or every Disney movie), and the opportunity to become part of the landed gentry. The belief that everything always works out is itself a major piece of the capitalists propaganda machine, and because we fall for this, we keep making decisions against out best interests - We are all just one fateful encounter away from becoming rich or famous after all.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 year ago

          That’s up to us. Get involved. Join an activist group, or a political campaign. Change policy. Show your neighbors how it’s possible to cut fossil fuels out of your life.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            121 year ago

            History is a big teacher, this issue is coming from the big boys of industry. Without major industry change it aint gonna happen, and worldwide as well. Even if the USA goes to 0 other countries can keep it going and offset any good we do.

            Im not being a downer, im being real, its bad. Real bad.

            • Dojan
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              If the USA goes to 0 (which is the most hilarious notion I’ve read all day) while other countries continue per the status quo, that still makes a difference. It helps to slow the increase, buying more time to actually solidify the numbers.

              The thing is, while the consensus is that we need to do something, and that something needs to be done a lot, and fast, we don’t have any quantifiable numbers, just estimations that may be wildly underexaggerated.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            Show your neighbors how it’s possible to cut fossil fuels out of your life

            Corporations account for more than 80% of all emissions. Anything we do on a personal level is the proverbial drop in the ocean

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              Kinda sorta; they’re responsible for more than 80% of scope 3 emissions, which counts what happens when fossil fuels they extract and sell are subsequently burned. Individually, what you do is tiny, but as you show people around you that it’s possible to live without fossil fuels, it changes behavior in the aggregate.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                When the vast majority of people are struggling just to survive on their ever weakening paychecks, where often even personal health becomes ignored, people dont have the economic, mental, or physical capability to do that. Or they may not even have the literally time available by working numerous jobs.

                If it was going to happen, it would have already happened years/decades ago when scientists and environmentalists were already raising the alarms.

                This is waiting until the entire kitchen in engulfed in flames before even considering turning off the oven. That option is long past. People are going to die. A lot of people. I cant stress how bad it is. A lot of fucking people are going to die, and many many more are going to suffer.

      • Veraxus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        It’s entirely a billionaire decision.

        Most of us humans have no power over this.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          “I alone can’t change anything” is a hastily spoken excuse to shift responsibility onto others. But you are responsible for your life and your actions.
          8 billion people on the planet understanding our future and changing the way we live is possible. Be a good example, because you can.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It does have to be. Because humans continue to make that decision, day in and day out, and ignore graphs like this. They ignore the blistering hot unprecedented Summer temps, the Arctic blasts, the hurricanes, the hailstorms, the increased insurance rates or even the unavailability of insurance altogether. They just keep driving their F150s to the office in rush hour traffic while heating hundreds of gallons of water in their pools that go unused 99.9% of the time.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    26
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    we’re all the frogs in god’s slowly boiling kettle.

    Fortunately Exxon et al made STELLAR profits for damn near a century, it only cost us the one viable ecosystem we have in the entire known universe.

    Tsk. Well profits have to be made, it’s capitalism. Can’t argue with that.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    69
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Narrator: The world became uninhabitable. But for a short time, it created tremendous value for our shareholders.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        191 year ago

        If you read the article, climate change + El Nino + reduced aerosols in the atmosphere + a volcano eruption + a yet unknown factor, which the article is about.

        • Optional
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 year ago

          Fair, and bonus points for RTFA.

          That said - we know what it’s about. That graph isn’t new. We did this last year too.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Instead of the bathwater cooling off after the tubs been filled, its heating up. We don’t understand why.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    I have a lot of conservative family members in my extended family. You can tell them this all day long, present all the data in the world, and they wouldn’t care one single crap.

    “Hoax, lies, fake news, liberal agenda, etc, etc.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    331 year ago

    I was watching a video about past extinctions and they had a line where the oceans warmed two degrees over two million years, which was just about enough time for the ecosystems to evolve and adapt.

    Look at what we’ve done in two hundred.

  • Goku
    link
    fedilink
    English
    891 year ago

    My wife told me I was a doomer gloomer for not wanting to have kids due to climate uncertainty. I wanted to adopt instead.

    I’m terrified of how the world will look over the next century for my 6 month old son.

        • Pyr
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          Obviously he should just kill his adopted kid

        • ExFed
          link
          fedilink
          English
          131 year ago

          Can’t be going and adopting kids all willy nilly, or else the adoption factories might ramp up production!

          /s

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1351 year ago

        Assuming you’re asking in good faith, the difference would be helping someone through this hell-hole that’s already here, and was disadvantaged at the start. As opposed to bringing someone in.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          371 year ago

          On top of that, having kids carries a massive carbon footprint. An adopted kid is already penciled in for that. I’d even wager a kid in the system would be more of a burden on carbon levels than one in a home.

      • yeehaw
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        The user is interpreting it as the OP wanted to not have kids because of climate uncertainty - did not want to raise a kid that would have to deal with the climate. So instead they adopted a kid to raise someone else’s kid in a world where they would have to deal with the climate.

        I think OP is implying reduction of population but the comment kinda reads weird.