• The House passed a more than $60 billion bill that provides more military aid to Ukraine.
  • It’s part of a larger foreign aid package that’s likely to pass the Senate and be signed into law.
  • 112 Republicans voted it against — the most ever, and a majority of the GOP conference.

Saturday’s vote marked the first time the House had approved billions of dollars in Ukraine aid since December 2022, when Democrats still controlled the chamber.

In the two years since Russia’s invasion, opposition to aiding Ukraine has grown from a fringe position to a majority view among House GOP lawmakers. Many argue the money should be spent domestically or that policy changes at the US-Mexico border should take precedence.

Here are the 112 House Republicans who voted against the bill.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    981 year ago

    The fact that the only Nays were Republicans speaks volumes. The Republican party has been compromised by Russia, it’s the only explanation that makes sense.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      651 year ago

      And, to clarify for future readers, this vote was only for the Ukraine Aid portion of the package. Each part got a separate vote. So even though the package includes Israeli funding, it wasn’t part of this particular vote which was exclusively about aid to Ukraine.

  • cum
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    So why are we expected to be the world police

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      Oh you’re one of those right wing dumdums who don’t understand why it’s better to fight a war before the frontline reaches your homeland?

      • cum
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Being anti war is right wing now?

          • cum
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Then why does the rest of the world about America meddling in the affairs of others?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          What do you prefer? That Ukraine rolls over to let Russia kidnap and rape their women and children while slaughtering every male?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The article “forgets” to mention the “foreign aid package” also contains billions to support “totally not a Genocide” commiting regime of Israel.

    I am not sure I would vote for it myself and I definitely support Ukraine.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          Because they get full intelligence briefing on the entire complex situation rather than.just getting indignant on the internet because of some memes and polemic opinion pieces they saw the headlines of

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Actually, sending taxpayer money to weapons manufacturers so you can support a genocide that your voters are ready to ditch you over is 9D chess, you wouldn’t get it

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            41 year ago

            Ohhh, yes. Our glorious leaders have secret information we don’t. Surely we must defer to their wisdom and support them unconditionally. /s

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            they get full intelligence briefing on the entire complex situation

            The year is 2003 and Nancy Pelosi is whispering to constituents that - yes, all this might look sketchy on its face - but the CIA just gave the intelligence committee a tip about this source named “Curveball” that’s going to prove Saddam has WMDs and justify the whole thing.

          • Schadrach
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            I mean that they’re our only real ally in the Middle East is probably enough on its own to justify the funding to Congress.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          Gotta speed that rapture along somehow. Also, for the slightly less insane ones, gotta have somebody there to keep Iran scared.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Which, paradoxically, means they’re all going to pass.

        The only piece of legislation the House really had beef with was the Ukraine bill. And they solved that by stapling the TikTok ban to it. Now the Dems in the Senate will greenlight all the money for Israel and Taiwan on reflex and choke down Ukraine as a sensible compromise.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      I’ve heard that Marjorie Taylor Greene is just Dog the Bounty Hunter in drag. I mean, has anyone seen the two of them in the same place at the same time?

      Also, I’ve heard that she (he?) has a cleft butthole.

    • RubberDuck
      link
      fedilink
      25
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I still like Moscow Marge more… But hey.
      Marjory Traitor Green.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      671 year ago

      For those who don’t know, The New York Post was the first American media outlet that Rupert Murdoch brought back in the day. It tries to play off being ‘center Right’ as opposed to Fox News. Following the spin on the spin can break your neck.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          211 year ago

          It’s a New York paper, so they can hate on MGT. They don’t have to be consistent with the message from one branch tp the other.

          I remember back in 2008. The Post had two op-ed pieces on the same page. One writer said that Obama was just another neoliberal hack who’d push a softer version of GOP plans and the voters should just opt for McCain. The other said that Obama was a hard Left radical who would about an extremist agenda.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            141 year ago

            The Post had two op-ed pieces on the same page. One writer said that Obama was just another neoliberal hack who’d push a softer version of GOP plans and the voters should just opt for McCain. The other said that Obama was a hard Left radical who would about an extremist agenda.

            It’s choose your own hatred adventure!

  • NoLifeGaming
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    Good. Amazing how people are suffering here but we always have the money for foreign countries. Next time they say how can we fund Healthcare, homelessness or some program designed to help us people remember this.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s a pretty selfish take. The US is (iirc) the largest economy on the planet. We take an absurd amount for granted and our standard of living compared to the vast majority of the world is insane. And yes - we’ve built it on the backs of damn near every culture on the planet. We deserve to give up aid to other nations. It is the least we can do. And frankly, this is a drop in the federal budget. Almost a rounding error. And even more, the majority of the money is gonna come right back into our economy because guess what - those weapons and ammo are going to be bought from U. S. defense contractors.

      • NoLifeGaming
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Perhaps you may live a privileged life but many of us don’t. And that money will end up in the pockets of corporations and those who own them, not us peasants. If standards were better and we had what some would say are basic rights such as Healthcare then it would be less of a problem

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Yeah, let’s pretend that these people aren’t the same ones that vote against healthcare, homeless shelters and giving women a choice…How stupid are you?

      • NoLifeGaming
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        I never said I’m with them. I’m simply saying that our money shouldn’t be diverted else where when people here are suffering. Don’t put words in my mouth.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Well, it’s not either/or. The same people that voted against aid to Ukraine are the same people that vote against spending money on the stuff that you wish they’d spend money on. But you’re ignoring all that, so I assume you’re just arguing in bad faith

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    Good for Speaker Johnson. It was a mistake for the far right to support him. He’s an evangelical, but he’s also a true believer, rather than a grifter. When fully briefed on the intelligence, he ultimately chose to do the right thing.

  • Dreizehn
    link
    fedilink
    211 year ago

    112 Government of Putin representatives and fully funded by the fucking Muscovites. Every single one of those asswipes, along with the MAGATs, should join their comrades on the front to receive a special greeting from NATO and Ukrainian shrapnel. Fuck them and in this case, the French should have never helped the Americans during their fight against the Red Coats.

    • Panda (he/him)
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      nyaaaaaaah putin >w< i wanna be one of your chiwd sowlders twerks in mass war crime

      - leaked imessage between matt gaetz and putin, probably

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Its the same picture. McCarthyism was far more about whipping domestic residents into subservience than opposing some foreign menace. The Republican alignment with Daddy Vlady is now just a litmus test for party line faithfulness. A kind of partisan hazing ritual, where you have to go on cable news and say the thing that will get liberals to boo at you, so you can prove you’re not one of them.

      Then you can start hitting the harder stuff. You get into the QAnon kool-aid that convinces you there’s a vast pedophile conspiracy to enslave white children, and only the most orthodox right-wing evangelicals can protect you from it.

      Modern day Birchers have far more beef with China than Russia anyway. For, uh… reasons.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1051 year ago

    Blatantly copying my previous comment.

    Hey, Republicans, do y’all remember Red Dawn? Those two movies you made about The USSR and Russia being the ultimate evil enemy that was going to invade and must be stopped? You do? Good.

    My real question is, why in the name of all that is Murican, ARE YOU ACTIVELY HELPING RUSSIA WITH THEIR ILLEGAL AND UNPROVOKED INVASION‽‽‽

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      731 year ago

      Because the Soviet Union was a communist dictatorship, which the GOP hated (the communist part of it, anyway), and modern Russia is kleptocratic oligarchy, which the GOP loves. Easy enough to tease out, really.

    • FenrirIII
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      Republicans are the kind of people who think Footloose is a warning against the dangers of freedom.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      391 year ago

      The GOP decision-makers see the Russian oligarchy and how freely they leech their wealth from the public and say “I want that.”

      The MAGA followers see modern Russian society as a bastion of “western” (white) moral traditionalism holding out against progressive globalist degeneracy where none of this “woke” shit flies.

      They have more in common with modern Russia than they do with modern America. They want the US to be more like Russia and many will be willing to spill American blood to get there.

    • John Richard
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      If you care as much about Ukraine as you claim to why don’t you go to the front lines and fight for them… Better yet, why aren’t you advocating the United States to go directly to war with Russia? Wouldn’t it be cheaper to get rid of Putin once and for all and to make Russia pay for the war?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Getting rid of Putin, and for that matter Xi, will likely not do a thing to stop the war on the Russian side, and the clear plans for invasion in the Chinese side.

        Hard evidence that neither country has functioning nukes would, but getting rid of either one just creates a power vaccume that will quickly be filled by someone that is likely to look much like their predecessor.

        • John Richard
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          So what you’re saying is that there is no winning the war against Russia… Just sending more money to Ukraine indefinitely?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            81 year ago

            No, I’m saying we have entered a new Cold War against both China and Russia that is likely to last for the next several decades. We can’t win a war. There are no winners in war. All we can do is provide enough resistance now to prevent the cold war we are in from boiling into active shooting in other theaters.

            • John Richard
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              The reason it hasn’t boiled into active war between countries is because we aren’t sending American troops to Ukraine to fight the war.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        521 year ago

        Ukraine isn’t asking anyone to go to the front and fight for them. They’re asking for this aid. Anyone who cares about Ukraine as much as they claim will listen to what Ukraine asks for.

        • John Richard
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          Halp me. They are attacking me send money, not reinforcements.

          Geez, you have to be either blind or dumb to not see what this is. Proxy war is war. This is about money at this point, and what better way to funnel money than through aid packages.

          • AutistoMephisto
            link
            fedilink
            41 year ago

            You dumb fuck. They’re sending that money in the form of weapons, ammo, fuel, tools, and equipment. Zelenskyy even said “I don’t need a ride, I need more bullets.”

          • Natanael
            link
            fedilink
            111 year ago

            They can send money to their weapon manufacturers even without this war, you know?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            281 year ago

            Are you suggesting these Ukrainians on the front line begging for ammo are getting rich off of this somehow?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            271 year ago

            Halp me. They are attacking me send money, not reinforcements.

            You think they are going to send a bag of money to Ukraine? Are you really that dumb? The approved amount is for weapons and ammo.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        38
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Idiotic.

        • why don’t I go fight? Because I’m not a fucking soldier. It would be a net negative for me to go fight. I have no military experience whatsoever. Ignoring the myriad other reasons.
        • No, it’s far less expensive to send equipment and give intel to Ukraine. Why the fuck do you think proxy war is a thing?

        Of course, you’re just shit-talking.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    80
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    well you got the names, now how about doing a little background check if there is some russki money lying somewhere in those traitors bank accounts…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      I’m doing background research and found a picture of biden laughing with medvedev and berlusconi. I guess it’s not just these 112 idiots who have ties with the mafia and russia but all of them are corrupted pigs in for the money and wealth

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        371 year ago

        If Biden is also taking bribe money from Russia, as you suggest, then we should expect him to veto this bill, right?

        Neoliberals are conservatives, but they usually are not outright traitors the way Republican conservatives are.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          If Biden is also taking bribe money from Russia, as you suggest, then we should expect him to veto this bill, right?

          No? While peasants get send to the front to die politicians are collecting wealth and power thanks to this war.

          You should expect politicians to do what’s in their personal greedy interest, being taking money from someone or stabbing them in the back.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Never made a post pro authoritarian corrupted governments. You must have open someone else profile

          • Natanael
            link
            fedilink
            71 year ago

            Some of the politicians realizes that an intact infrastructure and Europe not burdoned by war is a good thing and helps economic trade, etc. Some are old school politicians focused on diplomacy and mutually beneficial agreements (as confirmed being the most efficient strategy by game theory).

            And then there’s the morons who only think about short term personal benefits

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      Your post history shows you are intelligent and articulate. I feel that, geopolitically, that is a self-destructive act for our country over time. Why do you feel it’s a bad idea?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Because the US has no intention of saving Ukraine. The intent is for the war to go on as long as possible so we can continue making a shitload of money on selling weapons. As soon as it’s no longer profitable we’ll let Russia roll over Ukraine.

      • NoLifeGaming
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        He already is winning. Look at a map of controlled areas by Russia vs ukraine. Watch analysis by Scott Ritter and John mersheimer.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          9
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Putin thought he would take Ukraine in a matter of days. It’s been years.

          The ruble has been hit hard by all the sanctions. The Russian economy has been weakened to divert funds to a war inept Russia can’t even finish. Russia’s infrastructure and money-producing assets like their oil refineries and rail yards are being attacked by Ukrainians as well as partisans within Russia.

          Are Russians killing a lot of Ukrainians? Sure, but they’ve made a laughable amount of progress in Ukraine over the years. Look at the Black Sea fleet numbers. Ultimately Putin is fucking over Russia for a war he can’t finish.

        • Diplomjodler
          link
          fedilink
          14
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Actually I’d prefer analysis based in reality, not some far right fantasy.

          • NoLifeGaming
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Your classification of them as far right says everything about your ignorance. Is everyone who doesn’t agree with you far right? Did you know that both soctt and John consider what’s going in palestine a genocide? Or can you not comprehend nuance and just like to stay in an echo chamber where you feel validated with your beliefs?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              41 year ago

              Nah, they’re not far right. One’s a sex offender and the other spews Putin’s words as truths, despite evidence to the contrary. Facts keep changing, yet mearsheimer’s “beliefs” do not. To him Putin isn’t an imperialist dictator despite the fact that he keeps annexing more and more land to russia by invading sovereign countries and has been “president” for over 2 decades while his opponents keep falling out of windows and such. 2014 was a coup, obviously, because Ukrainians couldn’t possibly be opposed to getting closer to Russia, etc, etc.

              Please…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        They’re right for all the wrong reasons. They just support Russia. I just don’t support Ukraine becoming the next forever war.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      66
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The aid is in the form of outdated, surplus military equipment that was scheduled to be replaced anyways. The alternative is paying a company to dispose of them. So why don’t you want to send this aid to Ukraine where it can be used? The only people that should have any problem with this are those who are busy sucking Putin’s knob.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        A lot of that equipment would’ve just gone back for rework and upgrades. Just because they’re old doesn’t mean they don’t work. That narrative was intended to force the US to by new more expensive hardware instead of repairing what we already have. Now that the old stuff is shipped out there’s a demand for new builds.

        We will only give Ukraine just enough to prolong the war as long as possible. This war means trillions of dollars in sales if it goes on long enough. I bet the US can stretch it up to ten years if they play the same right. And all the while, Ukraine will be bombed to shit, waiting for the US mega corporations to make more money on the reconstruction efforts. They just need to make sure Putin stays in power or the whole scheme falls apart.

        • theprogressivist
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          So your idea is to let Russia steamroll Ukraine in which Ukraine will still be bombed to shit? Yeah you’re a fucking bootlicker.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            The best idea is to force a peace treaty. Tell Putin he can have the land he’s captured if the war ends now. Better to let him take that land than wait until Russian military gets back into Kiev again or other more populous cities in the West. He’ll feel like he’s won and the killing will end. Otherwise there will be no end. Putin will never give up unless the Russian people put his head on a pike. Even if Ukraine somehow manages to push Russian troops back to their borders, the war doesn’t end there and Ukraine isn’t going to conquer Russia.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        The only people that should have any problem with this are those who are busy sucking Putin’s knob.

        I would like to point out that russia is fine with this war otherwise they wouldn’t have started it. Politicians and government use wars as a tool to get more power and enrich themself which is pretty much what is happening right now too

        • Skua
          link
          fedilink
          191 year ago

          Russia isn’t necessarily fine with it just because they started it. After all, they seized Crimea back in 2014 and got away with it without a fight. Russia also made a push to capture Ukraine’s government in a matter of days at the start, which they wouldn’t have done if they didn’t think there was a chance of it succeeding. It’s very possible that Russia expected this to be over quickly and based its decision on that expectation

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            If they are able to bribe 112 US government figures i believe they also weighted in the option that the invasion of a full ass country they have been at war since 2014 could have last more than 3 days

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        261 year ago

        Or people who don’t know anything about what you said because the media just acts like the bill steals money from us to give to them instead