Update, yes there are snipers:
In any case, the people saying this is pretty standard security for a large gathering of people are correct in it’s regularity, but I’m not particularly convinced that they’re correct in its efficacy as a practice. They’re all visible enough that they can be seen by the student body, which is either bad planning or blatant intimidation, and obviously gives up their position immediately, which is bad since they’re potentially a would-be ne’er-do-well’s greatest threat. If anyone becomes embedded in the protesting crowd, they become much less effective, if anyone takes up a tactical position, they become much less effective. If anyone starts to try to instigate violence between the protestors and police, which would probably be what any bad actor would do since it has a pretty high chance of success, they’re much reduced in their efficacy, or potentially even negative in their efficacy as it leads to an escalation of violence. If anyone has a bomb or does chemical attack, the sniper is probably too late.
Plus, from what I’ve seen of the other protests, the police already have a perimeter set up on the ground keeping track of who enters and exits, which makes sense. Snipers would probably be better served as a part of that perimeter rather than surveying the inside of the protest, since they can cover a pretty large distance, you could turn them around pretty quickly, if they did need to fire on where the protestors are actually gathered, they can screen who’s entering and exiting, and it’s overall better optics. They could probably keep their position better concealed since there’s not a huge crowd of people looking at that side of the building (if they even made any attempt to be concealed, which should be really the bare minimum).
This doesn’t make any sense to me, even just as a kind of surface-level tactical decision. Maybe I’m missing something here, but this just seems like it’s maybe stupidity, or intimidation or something else I can’t think of.
I knew this was a terrible country but Jesus fuck
Of course they’re not snipers.
. . .
Raises eyebrow: But what if they were?
Yeah, duh they aren’t snipers, they are police marksmen with high-powered scoped rifles, totally different.
removed by mod
deleted by creator
ACAB
All Coloured Are Bastards? Don’t you think it’s a bit racist?
All Carsalesmen Are Bastards.
Defund the dealerships!
Those aren’t cops.
What are they?
They Snipers
You need to have authority to be a sniper. Who has the authority for lethal law enforcement?
You need to have authority to be a sniper.
Is that even true?
Um…YES
The police don’t just pull farm boys with a crack shot every time they have a sporting event. They are fucking cops. Not only cops, but specialty cops. SWAT cunts. My homie is one - went from infantry to ranger to police to swat. Yeah - he’s a cunt, too. ACAB.
Sniping is not something you self-discover. You’re trained by a government-sanctioned organization.
Nah man when there’s a terrorist threat or some kids are getting fesity we call up those smitty brothers down on farmdale ave. I’ve seen em hit smack in the middle of grandma’s can o beans from a mile and a half away in the rain – i swears it!
Stupid answer.
ASAB?
Not if they take out the right perp
We didn’t start the fire It was always burning Since the world’s been turning We didn’t start the fire No, we didn’t light it But we tried to fight it
I’ve seen this before, they intend to begin beating students soon and fear reprisal.
Conservatives
Liberalism is when you blame conservatives for what you’re both doing.
Indiana University also has snipers: https://lemmy.ml/comment/10599404
Shocked they didn’t bring the tank
I guess these guys are always on the rooftops around campus.
Cute are they cosplaying Gaza
Nah they haven’t shot any children or journalists yet
“Yet” being the operative word.
Remember that US intelligence services speculated in using snipers to kill “Occupy Wall Street” protesters on university campuses.
FBI coordinated with banks and universities to get information on students.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/dec/29/fbi-coordinated-crackdown-occupy
Sadly, this is what we voted for.
How so?
“Why do all these commies keep muttering about what happens when you scratch me?” - Any establishment Democrat.
“Oh, I know why they do, and I’m into it. I know they know, and the Dems don’t, so it doesn’t matter.” - Republicans
I dont even know what this means
Statistically unsurprising
What? Im not sure if you are being condescending or something butnwhatever it is I cannot understand what you are saying. Try simple sentences.
Oof, skill Issues
That simple enough for you?
Like no it is vague and condescending. It isnt comprehension skills that ae the issue here, it your communication skills.
I think a lot of people here were too young to vote in even 2000-2008, let alone 1968 onward