Fayette Janitorial Service LLC agreed to pay nearly $650,000 in civil penalties and the court-ordered mandate that it no longer employs minors.

A Tennessee-based sanitation company has agreed to pay more than half a million dollars after a federal investigation found it illegally hired at least two dozen children to clean dangerous meat processing facilities in Iowa and Virginia.

The U.S. Department of Labor announced Monday that Fayette Janitorial Service LLC entered into a consent judgment, in which the company agrees to nearly $650,000 in civil penalties and the court-ordered mandate that it no longer employs minors. The February filing indicated federal investigators believed at least four children had still been working at one Iowa slaughterhouse as of Dec. 12.

U.S. law prohibits companies from employing people younger than 18 to work in meat processing plants because of the hazards.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      131 year ago

      It’s always immigrant kids. Nobody should be surprised that the companies that are willing to illegally employ immigrants are also willing to violate other labor laws.

      Allow these people (the adults, not kids) to become legally employed and this problem will be drastically reduced.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        I work for a top 50 by population city here in the US and they’re hiring illegals left and right. They do it by bringing them in through a temp agency and then transferring them over to our books after six months.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There is no such thing as an illegal person. A business may have illegal hiring practices, though.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    181 year ago

    Child labor laws are ruining this country! I started at the metal refinery when I was 9, and worked my way up to shift foreman by 12.

    • Dojan
      link
      fedilink
      811 year ago

      Honestly when it comes to severe crimes the punishments should put them out of business. Yeah some people will lose their jobs, but suddenly there’s a vacuum that can be filled, and it’s not like the expertise is gone. Someone else can start a better company that doesn’t do illegal shit and fill that vacuum.

      Isn’t that how capitalism is supposed to work anyway?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        201 year ago

        This isn’t a skilled industry, hence why they have children working there. The equipment/facilities is the real value. Unless the government wants to take control or find new management, the jobs are dependent on whoever owns the machines.

        Or, just maybe, we close the meat packing plant anyways because everyone should eat less meat.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          221 year ago

          It’s not even the slaughterhouse. The meat packing plant contracted out to “Ricky’s bone saw cleaning LLC” who is paying the fine for child labor. They might have a few jugs of detergents and sanitizers plus some work vans.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          No no no! It’s the responsibility of the corporations to act ethically! Consumers bear no fault in how corporations decide do business!!

          Yikes, sorry about that. I had the urge to sound ridiculous for a second. I agree. Money talks and we should all be mindful of what we say.

      • Avid Amoeba
        link
        fedilink
        14
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I keep hearing this about how companies failing being how capitalism is supposed to work. Capitalism doesn’t give a shit about bad companies failing or competition. Capitalism is concerned with the ownership of the means of production. Lack of regulation and competition works tremendously for the owners of capital and those owners will use their capital to foster such profitable environments. This is how capitalism works.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    even assuming the truth of the idea that it’s good for children to have jobs, do they have to be cruelest and most grueling upton-sinclair ass jobs you can find? at least adults can drink after a long shift at the meat processing factory. kids should be working the register at a movie theater or something. also i can’t imagine a small child is as efficient at cleaning out vats of blood as an adult would be

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      Bad idea. Just increase the fines so they outweigh any potential savings the business may have received.

      Hit them where it hurts, in their wallets.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              From a better solution that actually improves the lives of people.

              He’s just advocating for revenge. It doesn’t solve anything.

              Let me say it again for the people in the back: it’s better to redistribute these people’s wealth than to throw them in prison without redistributing their wealth.

              Try not to distract from the problem at hand.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      151 year ago

      I’d say one day for each hour of child labour for everyone who was involved in facilitating it, or had oversight responsibilities.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      And yet in the same breath we often point out that prison time doesn’t rehabilitate (think petty crime). I think realistic fines to individuals AND companies that are more than “cost of doing business,” as well as blacklisting the (undoubtedly several) individals responsible from being able to hold that level of power in an industry, not just the company, then there may be a reasonable deterrent, and it won’t be a languishing burden on tax payers to put these guys up in dressed up 4 star hotels.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        People deliberately putting children’s lives at risk should be jailed the same whether or not they are doing it from hiding behind a limited liability. And also the prisons should be changed so that they are actually about rehabilitation.

      • Captain Aggravated
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I mean, I’m okay with disposing of these shitty people. They’re obviously irredeemable.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    11
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    i don’t know how they can call these places “meat processing plants”. they are slaughter houses. for slaughtering

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      Because people are detached from ethics and humanity as an intended function of capitalism. If people regarded animal welfare every time they needed to eat by being exposed to the slaughter, line might go down. Media is sanitized whatever degree maximizes potential consumer bases, and ultimately profits.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    16
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    And they think an untrained minor will ever effectively clean food production compared to trained adult. Doesn’t matter that they are endangering a minor and giving people food poisoning, as long as it’s cheaper.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    291 year ago

    No fine for Perdue or Seaboard Triumph Foods though even though the kids were even allowed in the plants. How could we possibly hold them liable for vetting outside contractors.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      That’s the way it works. It’s a risk management and mitigation strategy for companies. You hiring contractors and offload the liability.

      From what I understand, and IANAL(with the best of em) we’d have to change the laws to go after companies for their contractor’s liability/negligence.

      I think you’d be able to go after Perdue or seaboard if you could prove they were grossly negligence or derelict or knowingly hired this contractorbecause they used kids.

      But they can play that legal “plausible deniability” card otherwise.