• SaltySalamander
    link
    fedilink
    91 year ago

    Not very many people want dumb phones, actually. Certainly not enough for anyone to mass produce the things.

  • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    Definitely wouldn’t want a dumbphone. Rather the opposite, like a super-smartphone, something like Raspberry Pi inside my pocket (PinePhone may be getting there).

    This post got me to try installing Jellyfin server in Termux under proot, only to realize it’s fairly useless for random videos and then wipe it 5 minutes later, but anyway that’s the kind of things I do/want to do with my phone.
    And hell, I’d definitely want a keyboard attachment like the PinePhone has.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    I’d like a smart phone with the latest Android, a great camera, and a color e-ink display. I’ve yet to find one.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      I don’t understand how you are supposed to look at the photos taken with the great camera on an e-ink display?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        It’s not about looking at them on that device, it’s about them looking good when viewed on any device, like if I text a photo to my wife and she looks at it on her phone.

        I want a device like this to exist, but every single time a company comes out with an e-ink phone, there’s some huge compromise. Usually, it’s the camera.

  • Beaver [she/her]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    If you want to eliminate distractions try installing one of the linux phone distros: Sailfish Mobian,Ubuntu Touch,PostmarketOs,Plasma Mobile.

    • Possibly linux
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Or just Lineage OS

      I used to recommend AOSP but all the apps have been abandoned

    • themadcodger
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      I would love to, but it seems they only work in very specific phones. And even then with questionable functionality. It kinda feels like trying to use Linux as a daily driver twenty years ago.

  • Juice
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    I got the Apple Watch Ultra 2 several months ago and to my surprise I’ve been leaving my phone home about half the time I leave the house. I can still text and answer a call, got my favorite playlists and albums downloaded to it and my Apple Pay setup. Having a dumb phone alone is probably still a step too far back for me but it’s nice having a simpler device that covers all the basics as well as this watch does. I can definitely see the appeal.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I want a phone that has an eink display but an ecosystem for apps. I want my battery to last weeks, I want my communications conduits to be dead simple, and I want to be able to run an OTP authenticator on it.

    If the thing I’m expected to have becomes highly useful for the things I’m expected to have it for while also interrupting my bad habit tendencies, I think it would be a good fit for me.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 year ago

    As the actual headline itself says, this is a niche. The editorialized lemmy headline makes it sound like much more than that. Dumb phones still exist, but not many people choose to buy them

      • Ricky Rigatoni
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        i just recently found my dumbphone (samsung intensity 2) from right before I got a glowiephone. It has access to email, apps for facebook, myspace, and twitter, and a web browser plus full slideout keyboard. So whatsapp, banking, and NFC shouldn’t be difficult at all. Only issue is that unless the bank makes a dumbphone compatible version of their webbed sight they’d need to make a unique app for every manufacturor ecosystem instead of the relative ease of one android and ios app to rule them all. Or have an API for the manufacturors to make their own doggone apps.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      You can just never connect your TV to the Internet or make it forget all networks, that works pretty well if you have a console or PC hooked into it that is doing the actual content for it

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        At some point smart TV manufacturers are going to catch on and require Internet, it’s only a matter of time

      • I Cast Fist
        link
        fedilink
        English
        121 year ago

        You still have to deal with the piece of shit taking forever to turn on, and the possibility of it simply dying because any component of the “smart” part died.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          In that case you replace the part that died, instead of throwing away everything. (see Hulk meme)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      I looked at this when replacing my TV. If you want a nice panel the options are pretty limited, or you have to pay for commercial sets or a projector. I settled on creating separate VLAN for my smarttv and limiting what apps are installed on it and sourcing a blocklist for all its tracking shit.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    Only if they can hardwire all the data collection in. That is too big of a money maker for them to give up.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    401 year ago

    Step 1: Reformat your Android phone

    Step 2: Turn on ultra power saving mode (this disables everything in the system except a few apps such as phone and messaging)

    Step 3: Never connect to the internet

    Et voila. You have a dumb phone.