Google rolled out AI overviews across the United States this month, exposing its flagship product to the hallucinations of large language models.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    591 year ago

    I mean… yeah layoff a whole bunch of people and start treating your employees like replaceable commodities… then go ahead and arrogantly deploy technology you don’t understand and :surprisepikachu: everything breaks.

    But management get to do things without personal consequence, as they’ll just lay off more workers to cover their absolute incompetence and things will continue to get worse.

    Perhaps we should be replacing C-suite dipshits with AI’s instead.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    241 year ago

    Does anyone have a realistic idea of how this happened? I get Google has been fallen off for awhile but they’re still a multi billion dollar company.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      271 year ago

      AI doesn’t exist. It’s a huge model that aggregates existing shit with some filler content to glue it all together. It is not sentient, it’s not creative, it’s literally a stochastic parrot

      So, when the original content is garbage, the output is also garbage. Shit in shit out when you train from fucking Reddit

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      251 year ago

      Worked for a company that had google as a client:

      Google sucks, everyone who works there is an idiot who sniffs their ass all day, nothing works, nothing gets fixed, it’s all just held together with duct tape.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 year ago

      I can’t imagine a ton of the people working there give a shit anymore when it seems like thousands of people are being layed off weekly while the company takes in billions in profit

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      Always remember that having more money doesn’t mean someone (or some entity) is more capable or intelligent. It just means they have way more latitude to fuck up, higher potential to hurt more people, and less chance of facing negative consequences when they do.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m probably late, but in this case this is the combinations of 2 things.

      1. The usual capitalistic incentives ruined yet another company. There was a recent article about how Google pushed out the people who builded and maintaned search on favor of MBA growth focused assholes. Like they put the guy that was Yahoo’s CEO while Yahoo search was crumbling, in charge of Google search to get him to increase the amount of searches they serve, and ads obviously. People keep suggesting to use DDG, or Kagi, or some other comercial product. And for now, we must because Google is basically useless right now. But just give time to the other companies to fall in the same trap hahaha.
      2. LLMs are not smart, not even close. They are just a parlor trick that has non technical people fooled. There is a lot of evidence to me, but to me the most obvious one is that they don’t have anything resembling human short term memory. Like the way they make them look like they are having a conversation is by providing the entire conversation up to that point, including their own previous responses lol, as input/context so the bot autocompletes the conversation. It literally can’t remember a single word of what you said on it’s own. But sureee, they are just like humans lol.

      So what we have here is obvious, we have a company trying to grow like cancer by any means necessary. And now they have a technology that allows them to create enough smoke and mirrors to fool non technical people. Sadly, as part of this they are also destroying the last places of the internet not fully controlled by corporations. Let’s hope lemmy survives, but it’s just a matter of time before they flood this place too.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        including their own previous responses lol, as input/context so the bot autocompletes the conversation. It literally can’t remember a single word of what you said on it’s own.

        Chatgpt has had memory from previous conversations for about a month now and it’s context window is no longer fixed. Additionally it has the ability to assign sentences to memory on its own. So if it “thinks” what you said is important it saves it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Can you point me to the paper/article/whatever where this is being discussed please? I’m actually interested on learning about it. Even if I don’t like the way they are using the technology, I’m still a programmer at hearth and would love to read about this.

          To the point of the conversation, honestly man that was just an example of the many problems I see with this. But you have to understand that people like you keep asking us for proof that LLMs are not smart. But come on man, you are the ones claiming you solved the hard problem of mind, on the first try no less hahaha. You are the ones with the burden of proof here and you have provided nothing of the sort. Do better people or stop trying to confuse us with retoric.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            I mean it’s just the release notes. Go to their website. I have used the memory feature myself on the app so know it’s working and as for the context window it can actually tell you what it is for each session.

            But you have to understand that people like you keep asking us for proof that LLMs are not smart.

            Where? Where have I asked that? Don’t strawman me, I am not your punching bag and won’t defend something I didn’t say. You can “come on man” all you want but it won’t change my answer. I have made zero claims if this thing is smart or asked anyone to weight in on the issue either way.

            I pointed out two features it has now, which I don’t think anyone can dispute that it does have those features. It has a larger context window and memory that it can update. That is all I said, a very small claim that you can prove for yourself in under five minutes by going to their website.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Oh, you are talking about this https://help.openai.com/en/articles/8590148-memory-faq hahahaha. I’m sorry man, but you are a moron or arguing in bad faith. That’s yet another feature where they inject even more shit in the context/input to make it feel like the thing has memory. That’s literally yet another example of what I was pointing out, so thanks for confirming my suspicions. Seriously dude, do better if you really want to have a conversation. Your response made me waste my time, and on top of that you insult me hahaha.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      201 year ago

      Easy: worse results with more ads means more searches and thus more ad impressions, therefore profit.

      That’ll only work for so long, but that seems to be what they’re doing.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    311 year ago

    This is what I love about Mike Judge’s work. It turns out to be always the best metaphor/reference/prophecy of the boring dystopia. Since 1999.

    • Bahnd Rollard
      link
      fedilink
      English
      361 year ago

      Idiocracy is the most unrealistic sci-fi/apocolyptic film ever made. President Comacho finds the most qualified person to help with a crisis, asks them for advice and then doesnt take credit for it. Noone put in a position of power would ever do that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        He used Not Sure as a smokescreen since the beginning, the whole point is that he never really understood what was going on. I am quite sure that American presidents are approaching that level of idiocy.

  • The Menemen!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Ah, so it only affects searching from the US for now. I already wondered why I couldn’t reproduce the stuff I saw here and why I didn’t really see a change at my Google results.

    • Billiam
      link
      fedilink
      English
      261 year ago

      You probably live in one of those “socialist” countries that has, like, consumer protection laws and stuff.

  • gregorum
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    an interesting change from it being a giant jumble of ads

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    It’s not hallucination, the proper word is Confabulation. Can we as a collective fix this now before we get stuck with the wrong word for the next 30 years?

  • Nualkris
    link
    fedilink
    English
    571 year ago

    Why does search need to be AI? I’ve had no problems finding any information I wanted under the former process.

    • leadore
      link
      fedilink
      441 year ago

      I think the idea is that you won’t even leave the Google page at all, they want to keep you on their site and serve you their ads instead of sending you to someone else’s site and giving someone else that sweet sweet ad revenue.

      • applepie
        link
        fedilink
        91 year ago

        The logic checks out. Avoid using google where possible.

        YouTube is their only must have service imho

        • FiveMacs
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          After the UI changes…yeah not even sure about that. Absolutely atrocious

          • applepie
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Well they are still fucking us but can’t replace the content… Yet

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              61 year ago

              But you can access the content without going to their site, with places like Invidious, and apps like NewPipe and Tubular.

              • applepie
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                I need it on my teevee so I pay.

                I still use Foss client o my phone tho

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  Ah yes, tvs. I don’t watch enough yt to want to watch it on tv, so I often forget about that. You’re right, no easy answers there right now. Certainly there are ways, but all sacrifice some convenience. Hopefully this will change soon.

                • tabris
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  61 year ago

                  If you have a way of installing android apps from the web on your TV, Smart Tube Next is very good. Sponsor Block is integrated if you want to use it, but I mostly am just glad it doesn’t serve ads.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Many large creators post on Nebula, and half my YT consumption has been replaced by Nebula

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          youtube will also become harvested for AI data. And filled with AI functionality in the future. ergo: Look out for alternatives.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 year ago

      You obviously haven’t used the web3 nocode blockchain NFT AI enough to have an informed opinion.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        Can I super-mega-ultra upvote this?

        It’s the same playbook as ever. Doubt can only be explained by ignorance, failure can only be explained by under-committing,

        The only way to have a “valid” opinion is to have already bought-in and be actively selling other people on it. It’s the same mentality as a cult or a pyramid scheme.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      But what about when you start wanting to know about life’s mysteries?

      Google isn’t staffed by geologists; how are they to know what number of rocks you should eat each day?

      Google search itself doesn’t have a functioning set of human organs; without AI how would they know how much urine to drink for kidney stones?

      Without AI it might’ve taken another century before we got spicy gasoline pasta recipe, and you think that isn’t a problem?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        it might’ve taken another century before we got spicy gasoline pasta recipe,

        The Anarchists Cookbook has had the recipe for napalm for a bit now. But I do get your point.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      It’s become more efficient to get basic info on virtually any topic by just asking an LLM like ChatGPT and that could be a serious threat to Google Search. People might form the habit of asking AIs for everything and then go to Google Search only when they want to dig deeper / find relevant articles etc. So I assume they added their own AI right into Search in an effort to continue being the first (and perhaps only) place one goes to for information.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    36
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    TBH I hate the term “hallucination” in this context. It’s just more BS anthropomorphizing. More marketing for “AI” (also BS). Can’t we just call it like garbage or GIGO or something more accurate? This is nothing new. I know that scientific accuracy is anathema to AI marketing but just saying…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      We don’t choose. It’s decided to be the term for this. Computer bugs aren’t bugs. Etc etc. It’s just what the scientists called it

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      171 year ago

      scientific accuracy is anathema to AI marketing

      Even though I agree in this context “hallucination” is actually the scientific term. It might be poorly chosen but in LLM circles if you use the term hallucination, the vast majority of people, will understand precisely what you mean, namely not an error in programming, or a bad dataset, but rather that the language model worked well, generating sentences that are syntactically correct, that are roughly thematically coherent, and yet are factually incorrect.

      So I obviously don’t want to support marketing BS, in AI or elsewhere, but here sadly it matches the scientific naming.

      PS: FWIW I believed I made a similar critic few months, or maybe even years, ago. IMHO what’s more important is arguably questioning the value of LLMs themselves, but then it might not be as evident for many people who are benefiting from the current buzz.

      • FaceDeer
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        It’s not, actually. Hallucinations are things that effectively “come out of nowhere”, information that was not in the training material or the provided context. In this case Google Overview is presenting information that is indeed in the provided context. These aren’t hallucinations, the AI is doing what it’s being told to do. The problem is that Google isn’t doing a good job of providing it with the right information to summarize.

        My suspicion is that since Google is using this AI for all search results it’s had to cut back the resources it’s providing to each individual call, which means it’s only being given a small amount of context to work from. Bing Chat does a much better job, but it’s drawing from many more search results and is given the opportunity to say a lot more about them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    781 year ago

    “Hey, we just promised you answers. We never promised you correct answers.” – Google Marketing, probably.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      “Besides, the more incorrect answers - the more time users will spend on our site and use our service to get the correct answer = more ads shown = more profit!”

  • Todd Bonzalez
    link
    fedilink
    English
    361 year ago

    The AI overview has told me so many lies. You thought Facebook made people stupid? Buckle in!

  • Margot Robbie
    link
    fedilink
    English
    661 year ago

    On the other hand, all these AI errors by Google have made for some great memes recently.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    161 year ago

    Tinfoil hat time. Do you think Google intended this to work well? Or are we talking a lot more about Google and LLMs than we would have otherwise?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      I defer to hubris in most of these cases.

      I am guessing that the people who made the decision to train on Reddit had no idea what type of place Reddit actually was just a short time ago. Maybe they heard of Reddit, maybe they noticed how useful Reddit was in search results, maybe they browsed Reddit and only saw the facade; what they definitely didn’t do is be a Redditor for years.

      Any Redditor on that team either kept their mouth shut because how funny the end result would be or was ignored.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    271
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The head of Google *Search right now is the same guy that was head of yahoo search when it was dying. To put all of this in perspective.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1061 year ago

        Thanks.
        Being a CEO must be amazing. You can fail and even bring an entire company down, and keep on getting the same job somewhere else.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          Of the company doesn’t even have to collapse, you just have to make it seem like it did. Lehman Brothers didn’t go bankrupt in the sense of the word a normal person thinks. If you or I go bankrupt it means ramen for dinner for the next decade. For Lehman it was just a strategic move.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          131 year ago

          I get your point but from a business perspective Google is doing pretty well (see last quarterly earning and they announced dividends for the first time). It’s good to be a shareholder and from that perspective the CEO is doing a good job.

          Time and time again markets have shown, within reason, poor user experience and anti-consumer policies do not negatively impact stock price.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Well not when it’s a company that people can’t get away from. Big tech is so big and there are so few alternatives that they can treat people how they like.

            We are living in the mega corp world now where they have more money than countries.

            Money is power to make the rules what you want.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              9
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Yes, again I’m not saying that’s how it should be, I’m saying what is.

              Enshittification won’t be a thing if actual user experience matters as much as we like it to in business.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            221 year ago

            It’s relatively easy to squeeze a profit boost by sacrificing long term vision… Last quarter will mean nothing if Google is knocked from its pedestal in a year or two (which is what the current trend looks to be pointing to)

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 year ago

              Yeah I want evidence for this. Please show me something that is even approaching the power of AdSense. Then do it for everything else they own. YouTube, Google maps, gmail, Android, the play store, etc.

              It’s this weird thing I see on lemmy “well I stopped using a product therefore it is dead”. News flash: Big Bang Theory ran for 12 seasons and Meta has a capitalization over half the countries of earth GDP.

              Problems don’t go away because you have decided to ignore them.

              • Queen HawlSera
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                Seriously, most of the internet still uses that ban happy nonsense that is Reddit. I hate being referred then when I have problems, m,y account was perma-suspended over bullshit!

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                FWIW they are cannibalizing ads right now with AI summaries, since people will navigate less to websites (in the world where they are useful, which they don’t seem to be at the moment).

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                To be brutally honest, many times I see Reddit / Lemmy proclaim, “Product X is dead because it did Y” - these claims are usually followed by surges in revenue / stock performance by said company and soon no one really talks much about it. Example - Netflix Password crackdown.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 year ago

                What you are stating is nowhere near the point I was trying to make.

                We have seen a million times how a company can be destroyed for short term gains… Most recent public example is red lobster

                I have no clue if this is what’s going to happen to google… But my point was that have a good last quarter (the one associated with the new head of Search) is not an indication that his strategies will pan out … In fact, everything he touched before went the same way, short term profit, long term demise

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              71 year ago

              Sure but Google Search has been crappy for many quarters.

              I’m not saying thats how it should be, I’m just pointing out what is.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          291 year ago

          He has experience and obviously that means he learned a lesson after failing at a job that requires being a belligerent asshole to get.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      That argument it’s fallacious and reductionist, I’m not denying the situation it’s messed up, but objectively speaking we all have 0 idea about who’s making what decisions and how this google search shitstorm was caused

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I dislike the entire article. Of course google search still works just fine. Claiming otherwise is only possible by magnifying a small, admittedly disfunctioning part of google search.