• gon
    link
    fedilink
    1762 years ago

    A classic. So many questions arise from this simple text+image post:

    1. Is this person’s child named really “Strairdrac The Netherwatcher”?
    2. Is Strairdrac even human?
    3. Why does Strairdrac want to teach crabs how to read?
    4. Why is it considered forbidden knowledge?
    5. What other knowledge is forbidden?

    We will never have all the answers. Still, the questions are themselves a sort of answer.

    • Goddard Guryon
      link
      fedilink
      352 years ago
      1. Strairdrac is three crabs in a trenchcoat, now teaching others of his kind how to blend in with humans
    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      the child is… strange.

      we’ve made repeated efforts to contact the Florida Guard, the Florida Attorney General, the Governor!

      Random Asshat: “the Florida Guard! that we be! please gaze upon my curdled milks and slimy vegetables!”

  • panCat
    link
    fedilink
    242 years ago

    It sure is forbidden knowledge , what if the crabs take our jobs next !

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      472 years ago

      if only there was a Black mirror episode about the dangers of being an overbearing parent.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          152 years ago

          it is not a speculation nor a prophecy lol, it’s stories exploring the human condition with technology as the driver of the story

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              52 years ago

              Merriam-Webster definition for “explore” 1a:

              to investigate, study, or analyze : look into
              ➡️sometimes used with indirect questions

              This definition makes no distinction between factual and speculative, and in fact invites speculative use with the second point. Additionally, there’s a long history of using the word “explore” in this exact type of situation.

              Anyway, the point is, don’t be such a wet blanket, plz.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                I just don’t think some fiction is reliable source of information.

                And I can’t see in the definition the meaning you are implying. You’re overstretching it.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  it’s unwise to take literary advice from someone that uses words without taking the time to learn their definition

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        The thing is, parents get incredibly conflicted messages about this. When a child DOES end up looking at something bad parents get all the blame for not supervising and controlling their child and get called abusive. If they supervise and control their child they get called helicopter parents or abusive as well.

        And it’s not only regarding the internet. When parents let their children roam, for example, the neighborhood and something bad happens, the parents get the blame and called abusive for letting their child roam the neighborhood. If they control outdoors time for they child, they are abusive again.

        It literally doesn’t matter what you do as a parent, a lot of people will call you a bad parent or an abuser for it. I believe it is one reason why some people don’t want to have children at all. It’s basically an impossible task.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          When a child DOES end up looking at something bad parents get all the blame for not supervising and controlling their child and get called abusive

          Not everywhere. This is typical for the US.

    • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃
      link
      fedilink
      152 years ago

      This sort of oppressive situation is my childhood in a nutshell. And you’re right, it’s entirely unethical, and in combination with other factors can be used as a factor in psychological abuse. I know I at least am traumatized from it, and surveillance was definitely one of many signifigant factors.

        • tesseract
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Exactly. Kids grown in high volume of surveillance (e.g. my nieces) end up being more aggressive towards rules, which creates people who think rules are there to be broken.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    172 years ago

    This isn’t even funny. my parents weren’t that tech savvy and i learnt about porn from about 4th grade or so. parents need to be in control of what their children are browsing

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      I hate these coomer groomers silently downvoting your comment. Parents do need to be in control until the age of 15-16, in addition to teaching them openly proper stuff about various kinds of addictions and psychological harms.

      • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        There’s a difference between passive blocking and surveillance. The former is a safety measure that’s perfectly sufficient to keep bad stuff away. The latter is an invasion of privacy that has no benefit, and many unsavory consequences on a child’s sense of trust and autonomy. Blockers are enough.

        It is a safe assumption that every human, at the age of puberty, will search for porn or sonething similar. If not, your kid is asexual.

        A blocker will prevent that search. You know that search will take place. Heck, you did it and at some point in time got away with it.

        What possible purpose would you as a parent have for knowing the details of that search? That is just a gross invasion of a very private phase in development. You might as well add cameras to the bedroom to see if your kid, who is obviously past puberty, is masturbating (of course they are - checking on it is just disgusting and creepy).

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          You want kids at the age of 12 (or when puberty hits) to fall into porn addiction in the name of freedom and privacy? That is very fucked up. And I say that as a privacy advocate. Privacy does not need to be the same for vulnerable children and matured adults who are mentally strong enough to make their decisions.

    • TheMoose
      link
      fedilink
      292 years ago

      Do you feel like you’re a worse person for learning about porn at such a young age? I also learned about porn around that age (2nd~4th grade) and I feel like it had no impact on my life whatsoever as an adult.

      The funny part of the post is referring to “teaching crabs how to read” as “forbidden knowledge”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        82 years ago

        It’s not about making me a worse person. It lead to addiction. At first it was maybe once a week…then twice a week…every two days…and then to about 2-3 times in a day. It’s hard to come out of it

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Porn or sex addiction isn’t a thing. In general, people who struggle with porn or sex are living in social environments that have pathologized them, and the struggle is in trying to conform to social expectations that make normal human experiences taboo.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          112 years ago

          IDK, teenagers masturbating a lot isn’t only new since porn access has become ubiquitous… Humans can obviously get addicted to all kinds of things and might need help controlling that addiction.

          The unrealistic expectations induced by porn have the capacity to negatively impact sex and relationships for generations. Nobody explains to kids that this is acting, that you should have mutual consent on what goes, and choking isn’t required. To me that part is the even bigger danger.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          If you’re talking about masterbating, then that’s not unusual or a bad thing necessarily. I didn’t encounter porn until late high school yet I would do that frequency as a younger kid. That’s normal for boys. What’s not normal is that you seem to have pathologized it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    42 years ago

    Kaspersky safe kids…Good to know to never use that.

    Kaspersky premium is still pretty good, not perfect, but good.

    • Johanno
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Also confirmed Russian company that sells data to their government.

      And since Windows 10 windows defender is (by Design) better.

      Because Windows integrated it into the Systems. Other Software needs to hack their way into those and often open more security holes than they protect

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    132 years ago

    computer spyware taught me not to trust computers, my parents, or corporations
    it also taught me how to format drives and reinstall operating systems

  • Ben Haube
    link
    fedilink
    1152 years ago

    When I was a kid (way too many years ago) my parents gave up trying to restrict my Internet usage because no matter what they did I could easily get around it. I knew more about networking than they did. Then I grew up to become an IT administrator.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      152 years ago

      And this is why kids should grow up with increasingly restrictive parental control software. It’s educational.

      • Artificial Human No. 20
        link
        fedilink
        82 years ago

        You’re not wrong. I was so desperate to get online as a kid I was pirating my neighbor’s internet on my Nintendo DS with a borrowed copy of the browser, because that was the only hardware I had with wifi access lmao.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Back when I was a kid, I ended up guessing my principal’s internet password for our local dial-up. His email was through our local phone company, so his login name was the same… So I had free internet from 8th grade til I graduated. Eventually, the phone company made it where only one person could be logged in at once, but by then I had the money to buy my own.

          My parents weren’t home a lot of hours in the afternoon, and I was the oldest, so I had free reign. I kind of miss those days

          I still remember the 3 passwords I got over the years. His was “kramer” and the other two were “Ozzie1” and “Chicken1”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      162 years ago

      I didn’t restrict my kids Internet access, but I did tell them that even though I’m not tracking everything they’re doing online, the ISP, the school, upstream providers, search engines, social medias, advertisers, and pretty much everyone else will be.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      172 years ago

      I gave my kids completely open internet access and just chose to talk with them on what they might encounter. If I’d locked their devices, they’d just went online at a friend’s place.

      • Ben Haube
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Yeah, I don’t have any kids yet, but if I did I would do the same.

      • china🇨🇳
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        Probably not younger generations are usually smarter than the older one.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          392 years ago

          I dunno… A lot of the newer gens didn’t have to tinker with everything to get it to work so they’re less familiar with the ins and outs of stuff. Not to say they all are because it’s silly to generalize that many people but many of them grew up with this stuff. Just like how I couldn’t tell you how a TV works or fix one but I’ve built all my own pcs. That happened naturally because I had to learn it early on to have a computer. That being said they definitely seem to be developing a unique skill set for navigating the internet and social media as a whole. I’ve noticed they’re a lot less likely to trust a generic Google search or various articles online. I guess when you’re raised around bullshit you’re gonna end up more critical of it. This is mostly about gen z of course and maybe younger millennials. Gen alpha is feral and weird we should all be worried lmao

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            Gen alpha is weird and feral and fucking great. I hope I see what madness the bring to this world.

          • tesseract
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            This is very true. We had to fix all the shit happens to our systems and stuff. But now, they have perfected by implementing this restrictive environments like mac os, chrome os, and stuff like this (windows is trying to implement same thing these days too). So, their devices don’t break. They don’t have to learn how to fix that.

            Nowadays kids don’t even understand basic file structure, lmao.

          • Woland
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            If they were really applying critical thinking to bullshit, mainstream media wouldn’t be forced to literally put together entire departments dedicated to fighting fake news.

            • Ben Haube
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              I think you misunderstand the reason they need to fight fake news. It’s for the boomers. Kids these days are very media literate and skeptical of everything. It’s really all the boomers who are falling for misinformation and spreading it on Facebook.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          112 years ago

          The fresh college grads getting hired at my work imply this is becoming an inaccurate generalization. Particularly in regards to tech. We may be reaching the brain’s natural knowledge saturation point, and with so much knowledge available, there’s a natural tendency towards a wide but shallow pool.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            72 years ago

            Also the fact that unless we have some very notable breakthroughs the tech adults of now grew up with will probably be relatively similar to those kids born now will grow up with.

            We saw massive technological growth over the last 70 years especially for computer and to illustrate my point im gonna note when my mother, grandmother, and myself were born and note the standard computers available.

            Me(1999) Computers were similar enough to modern ones that there isnt much to note outside of processing power and startup, sure theres clear differences but if you know how to operate windows 98 you can probably figure out windows 10 with ease.

            My mother(1979) Congrats you have the apple II computer, some weird texas Instruments computers, and whatever IBM is making. The commadore 64 will be released in three years. Almost all the knowledge is irrelevent for these computers because between the internet and the march of progress not much is gonna be recognizable.

            My grandmother (1956) Computers are the size of rooms and their consoles resemble radar equipment more than anything else probably cause it is old radar equipment. Colored television is a luzury item and the average person thinks a computer is someone good at mathmatics.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          52 years ago

          Dad creating a small business class network with DPI at home to find out if the kids do something bad. :p

          • Ben Haube
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            I don’t have any kids yet (I’m 32) but I do have a small business class network. 😂

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      26
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      My mom asked my uncle to restric access.
      I researched how to unblock it during my time :)
      Was seemingly IP-based and the router probably just created an DHCP reservation for my device. Changing IP to static and done. They should do it via MAC. And even that is useless nowadays.

      Edit: Also work in IT now.

      • Ben Haube
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Yeah, with MAC randomization being readily available on pretty much any device now it is also pretty useless.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      I’m not reading you CAN’T, but filtering software is FAR better than the shit we got around. If you lock your bootloader there isn’t much you’re going to be able to do except use other devices available to you.

    • peto (he/him)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 years ago

      If your kid isn’t looking up forbidden knowledge you failed as a parent.

    • Tb0n3
      link
      fedilink
      172 years ago

      Yes and it also makes the child Strairdrac the Netherwatcher.