FUTO just launched their privacy focused keyboard app. I know there have been quite a few posts about keyboard recommendations, so this might be worth checking out if you’re not happy with your current one.

  • Autonomous User
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    WARNING Anti-libre software, FUTO Keyboard and Google Play, bans us from removing malicious source code.

  • foremanguy
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    Just use heliboard (openboard’s fork to accept multiple languages spelling-correction), you dont have to search further

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Id use it but the hindi keyboard sucks and I dont know how to fix it (inscript with “capitalized” underlay)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    So far it seems quite impressive. Also has scroll on spacebar swipe which I wasn’t expecting but is a great touch.

    Not sure I can live without a gif search but given that would require network access and reduce privacy, maybe it makes sense to just change to gboard when needing gif search then switch back for everything else. Not too annoying so far.

    I’ve been meaning to try helisboard buy having to add in the swipe and then also add in futo voice to text felt like a project and this is an all in one which is great.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    2fer on this one - got a fun new keyboard and discovered Obtainium, which I’m quite excited about!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    Looks nice! Hope they add Korean and Chinese characters as that doesn’t seem to be working for now.

    • @[email protected]
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      201 year ago

      Huh, thanks for the heads up. Section 4 makes it look like they can close-source whenever they want.

      I’m just glad FUTO is still letting Immich use the AGPL instead of this, though.

    • geoma
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      It is open source. But they supposedly keep some rights (they say for some time) so people dont produce fake versions of their software like has happened with newpipe (newpipe versions on google play store bundled with malware). I dont like a license like this but I think I want to trust Louis Rossman. He looks like someone who is truly commited tto his mission.

      • umami_wasabi
        link
        fedilink
        21
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You sure? Section 2.1 miss an important keyword: modify. If I can’t modify and distribute my modified version, it can hardly call OSS.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      This license while not the most permitting does not appear to hide the code behind any proprietary shielding though.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ah. Of course. Something being open source doesn’t make it open source. It all makes sense now thank you for clarifying.

          That also wasn’t technically a response to my comment, it was an ideological defense mechanism to avoid addressing the content of the license.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            You still shouldn’t dismiss these sorts of licenses as “free software” has done an alright job for user freedoms but not getting developers compensated for their efforts—which is why licenses like these pop up sharing the source code, but not letting their work be exploited.

          • umami_wasabi
            link
            fedilink
            71 year ago

            May you explain how it is OSS when the license Section 2.1 doesn’t grant me the right to modify the code?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              31 year ago

              Yeah I don’t agree with the osd being the only approach to being open source. Turns out people have differing opinions on that. You’re welcome.

              It wasn’t a response to my comment because you didn’t respond to my comment. You said is proprietary. I point out that it’s not a terrible license. Then you resort to a sound bite non response.

              You could have pointed out for example that ftl 3.2 and 4.1 are pretty shitty limitations to impose.

  • CubitOom
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    Giving it a try. But so far it seems like it would be nice if you can specify a different sever to run the whisper api calls on. I set up kõnele to use my server for voice to text, but it would be nice to remove an app.

    • Joël de Bruijn
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      For example, because its autocorrect in a multi-language setting is pretty bad (autocorrecting wrong language even if its manually switched).

    • asudox
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s the voice recognition model probably. Plus there are machine learning models in it as well to predict text.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    I use heliboard and futo for speech to text. I was using sayboard for stt, and it worked OK, but futo just seems so much better at it. So far in liking it, I didn’t know they released a keyboard as well, I won’t be giving it a try but I hope it works out, I’d prefer FOSS.

  • 2ugly2live
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    Thank you for the recommendation. I’ve been dying to get rid of Swiftkey. 🙏🏾 So far, it seems to work well.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      It can’t be included in the official F-Droid repos, as it is not Open Source.

      It’s hardly better than any other proprietary software as the FUTO Temporary License does not allow users to make modifications and share them with non-programmers. They could include ads or spyware and no one would be allowed to strip that out and share the result with others.

      They also clearly forbid redistribution “directed towards […] monetary compensation”. But F-Droid has to be compensated for their server costs as well, and they ask for donations as they should be. That’s why limiting commercial redistribution alone is a huge issue that would keep it from ever being called “Open Source” or “Free Software”.