• DominusOfMegadeus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1491 year ago

    I am also seeking a $1 billion buy out, to compensate for years of being underpaid! What a coincidence!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      I’d buy you out but all I have is my 20 bucks from streaming music revenue and I’m going to spend that on beer.

      • Bizzle
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        If you even made one dollar off your own music, that’s fuckin cool. You earned that beer!

        What’s your band called?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              a) Thank you :) That’s super nice to see, first thing in the morning.
              b) Please tell your friends
              c) Which ones do you like best?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          oh jesus, GOOD beer.
          how anyone can drink sub-par beer is fucking beyond me. Drinking that stuff is just self-disrespect. I mean, I get it, but, just, no.

          • downhomechunk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 year ago

            I can confidently say as a recovering alcoholic that I would have bought neither. I would gave gone with a handle of the cheapest vodka in the store and a pouch of drum, bugler or Samson. And that would have been my 3 meals for the day.

    • Skymt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Turn them into bovine fodder, then get the oil from the bullshit.

  • Kokesh
    link
    fedilink
    English
    108
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No one wants badly executed overheating slow Google assistant in a pointless little box. You already have a superior assistant in your pocket, reacting to your voice.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      And bluetooth pins that allow you to talk to the AI in your pocket already exist. That’s without that projector screen thing but still.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Sure sure, but this one is very close to your skin and vital organs and could burn you or just plain explode, so how about it?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Some try-hard wants to reinvent the wheel to show what a cutting-edge “disruptor” they can be, but they only succeed in making a shittier version of an already extant product

  • recursive_recursion [they/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181 year ago

    Thinking about the cost of maintenance, liabilities, and ethical/moral decisions

    • you couldn’t pay me enough to take on that company

    good luck to anyone else thinking otherwise

    • Diplomjodler
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1221 year ago

      Every web outlet and influencer with more than 1000 followers bought one. But that’s all they’re ever going to sell.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        961 year ago

        Isn’t it ironic that most likely, all their sales were used to make videos roasting their shitty product?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    79
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    ask for 1B valuation with only ~7M in sales + ~240k/mo subscription revenue… hmmmm gonna be a no for me Dogg

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      Don’t forget about the dangerous batteries and looming recall (due to court action I’m sure)! They’ll soon have ZERO customers, in a way.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      So, if we do some sloppy rounding and say that the subscriptions make them 3 million a year . . . it’ll only take a bit more than 330 years for anyone buying Humane at the asking price to break even. My cat could figure out that wasn’t a good buy. (Of course, he’d prefer to invest in a tuna cannery . . .)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The entire company was a pump and dump scheme. They’re gonna continue the pump until dump or bankruptcy.

      • Natanael
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Extremely expected for a company that used to be all on in NFTs

        • shackled
          link
          fedilink
          English
          191 year ago

          That’s Rabbit not Humane AI. These two clowns came from Apple and started Humane

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      I could see Apple buying it. The form factor makes sense, it’s the fact that it relies on AI and has its own cell connection are the main issues. If I could tap it and have Siri take dictation or take a picture of something to get more information it would be pretty neat.

      • capital
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 year ago

        I don’t need any hardware that does something my phone already does.

        I don’t understand this reverse consolidation these companies think people want.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 year ago

        Does it though? Having it pull down your shirt, having to rely on projecting a GUI on your hand, and being unable to hear it in loud environments all seem like pretty strong limitations of the form factor

        • Boomer Humor Doomergod
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          I’d drop the projector interface, as cool as it is, since you have a phone for that. Maybe make it a pendant as well as a pin.

          Apple’s got a lot of experience with using tiny speakers in loud places, so I bet they could figure out something maybe using directional microphones. Plus, again, you’ve got the phone so you can use the headphones.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            251 year ago

            If you drop the projector, then airpods already do it better when paired with the watch. There’s no point in such a device at all, then.

            • Boomer Humor Doomergod
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              Airpods don’t have a camera though. 90% of my photos are of things I need to remember, like a shopping list or a specific product I need to get Having to dig out (or find) my phone to do that is a pain.

              And I don’t have Airpods because I’d lose them, one by one, and the replacements are twice the price as another pair of perfectly workable Bluetooth headphones.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 year ago

                If they wanted to companies could put a camera in a smart watch easily. Samsung was doing it ages ago.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  41 year ago

                  My kids have a crappy watch ($30-40) that has a camera. It’s not a technical problem, it’s just a stupid idea, it’s not an ergonomic place to use a camera.

                • Boomer Humor Doomergod
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  31 year ago

                  The time before I lose a pair of glasses is inversely proportional to how much I pay for them. If I spent $400 on glasses they would likely disappear off my face before I left the store

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 year ago

        Why on earth would apple buy this shitty android device? And feature wise, they can just make the airpods into an AI device paired with your phone or watch.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    321 year ago

    Huh - so it turns out people liked how smartphones consolidated all their various devices into one?

    I guess the era of the hardware app is over…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      251 year ago

      You can’t conclude that from this. The fact that there was hype and excitement about this supports an interest in the concept. This was simply utterly horrible execution and that is all.

        • Jesus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          I don’t know about that. That a LOT of people liked that reveal TED talk.

          If this was half the price, could hold a charge, didn’t start fires, and didn’t pull your shirt down, then it would still be dumb, but you’d probably have enough people buying it to keep the company alive.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            That was a year ago, with 2 million views and 39k likes. That is not sign of hype. Specially when contrasted directly to the reality of sales.

            Dear lord, you can see on the TED talk when he does the obviously planned big reveal, Imran Chaudhri doesn’t even get an applause. He actually pauses a few times in the conference waiting for the audience to applaud and nothing happens a couple of times. When he makes jokes almost nobody laughs. There’s even a point where he jumps the gun and says thank you before the spontaneous applause™ happens. That has to be the most cringe TED talk in history (and that’s hard because almost all of TED in the past 5 years is cringe), other than the fact it was just an obvious ad.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I just disagree and/or read different sources. There was considerable hype regarding this device across numerous tech sources and many people liked and still do like the idea. Clearly you don’t think everyone hated it do you? Using words like everyone or no one almost always means your sample is off or your are projecting an opinion.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            Yeah, I don’t doubt there were people who were really hyped out of their minds for this. But it’s my impression they were a minority. Almost all press around the device was extremely skeptical, and only a few were cautiously excited. I follow a lot of tech circles in social media and there wasn’t really a buzz about the pin. But, I think the proof is in the pudding. 10,000 sales is not exactly evidence of an extremely popular device. Even if the end result was bad, if there was a lot of hype, one would expect higher sales. After all we knew the price and conditions of sales (subscription) for a long time before release.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              I don’t think that’s the pudding. The device had a high bar for entry with its price and was a very novel tech device. Most people interested in the concept likely were reticent to pre-order and wanted to wait for early adopter reports to surface. I maintain that there is a viable market and sufficient enthusiasm for the technology / concept that the company promised, but obviously not the one they delivered.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                3
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I mean, sure. Several startups are making bank selling AI, not to individuals, but to companies. There is no money to be made long term on mediocre chatbots. No matter in what form factor they come, and unfortunately, this and the rabbit thing poisoned the market and clearly marked anything AI as a scam on buyer’s minds.

                Edit: also, if the hype were really that high for such a device, then the rabbit should’ve sold a lot more units, since it was the budget version of the humane pin. But that wasn’t the case either. And now everyone knows both companies were just pump and dump scams.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  Rabbit r1 garnered $10million in pre-order sales. How many should it have sold to impress you? The first 5 batches I think sold out within a day or days, production of the units appeared to be the bottleneck until people actually got a hold of them and reported on how awful they were.

                  You just seem bent on this whole issue. Is there a point you want to make? Or are you just upset about AI stuff in general?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    131 year ago

    I could draw a kitten for that kind of money if anyone is interested. At least there are no monthly costs to it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    Given the amount of money they’re looking for, guessing it’s for the unreleased products in the pipeline and their patents. Anyone who buys them is not purchasing their v1 product.