• @fah_Q@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    71 year ago

    Funny if you to believe any of these clowns have seriously been in a church before.

      • @fah_Q@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Trump people only “identify as religious” they aren’t the terrible people that traditional attend and hate. Lol I’m sure there is a slight overlap in the Venn Diagram.

        • @Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I live in the Bible belt and can tell you: the evangelical megachurches are chock full of Christian nationalists.

          Sure, there are factions in the GOP that don’t really care about religion , but the SCOTUS wouldn’t have overturned Roe if the hardcore religious zealots didn’t work for decades to get it done.

          The protesters at abortion clinics were bussed there by the churches a lot of the time; they’re not outliers here. They are the engine that runs the party here in Texas. They have all kinds of excuses as to why Trump is doing God’s will despite being a terrible human being.

          • Flax
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Ironically though, megachurches are heavily frowned upon in Christian discourse spaces as basically being incredibly lukewarm

    • finley
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      There’s no hate like Christian love.

    • Jeena
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      “In the ordinary moral universe, the good will do the best they can, the worst will do the worst they can, but if you want to make good people do wicked things, you’ll need religion.”

      • Flax
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Problem is that if you even read the Gospel of Luke or even Matthew alone, it basically already contradicts a lot of Trumpian rhetoric

          • Flax
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Nice way to cherrypick the verse and remove context 🤦

            It’s part of a wider account of Thomas literally seeing the risen Christ in front of him and still not believing. So Thomas insists that he touches His wounds. And this is simply Jesus’ response blessing him who believes what he saw with evidence, but also blessing those who haven’t witnessed the resurrection and risen Christ.

            So He blessed two groups of believers: Those who critically investigate the resurrection narrative, and those who didn’t feel the need to.

            I, personally, fit into the former category.

            • Jeena
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Nice way of accusing me of removing context while doing it yourself.

              Assuming that what is written is true - and not just a folk tale like the Little Red Riding Hood, which is more probable - and that this specific God exists and became his own son and then died and got resurrected.

              If we take into account the context that this text has been written several hundreds of years after it happened, anyone alive back then and also today can *only* be one of those who believe without seeing, because we can’t go back in time to experience it ourselves like Thomas or the other apostles did.

              So, we can’t be the one “who believes what he saw with evidence”. And we can only be “those who haven’t witnessed the resurrection and risen Christ”. And this is one of the fundamentals of any religion, but especially Christianity where you have to believe in Christ otherwise you will go to hell.

              There is also the subtle nuance that if there is evidence then you don’t need to believe, you just know.

              With this context, at least I come to the conclusion that “religion demands you to go against evidence and just believe”, otherwise you will go to hell, which nobody wants.

              • Flax
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                The Gospel of John was written 40-70 years after the resurrection of Jesus.

  • Shadehawk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    871 year ago

    I’m sorry but should a church housing a political rally and supporting a political figure not be all sorts of illegal if theyre tax exempt?

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      581 year ago

      The claim was that it was a roundtable discussion that Trump was a part of.

      But of course, every Trump public appearance is a Trump rally.

        • @Simulation6@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Don’t bear false witness covers some of it, and I’m sure there is some snippet of text in the outdated testament that can be taken out of context to cover the rest.

        • @beebarfbadger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          I’m sure there are exceptions for when you have to cover up your extramarital affairs with pornstars, when you reeeeeeally wanna keep some top-secret documents for personal use, when you make your money by defrauding others or just feel like keeping people in permanent fear so that they turn to you for salvation. After all, the constitution, which he has very much read, says that he can do absolutely everything with absolute impunity.

      • @Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        231 year ago

        A claim that isn’t true and made knowingly is called a lie.

        But also any time his lips move and words are produced, they are also called lies.

  • Monkey With A Shell
    link
    fedilink
    81 year ago

    Oh, wrong kind of black church, I was trying to figure if he was going to a branch of the satanic temple or what was going on here…

    • The Satanic Temple come off as solid Democrats if not anarchocommunists or something. If it was a Satanic house of worship, it could possibly be the Church Of Satan (who, at least in Anton LaVey’s time, were dominance-oriented Ayn Rand assholes philosophically indistinguishable from today’s Republican Christianity), or if they’ve mellowed in their old age, the Order of Nine Angles (who, conveniently, are also neo-Nazis).

      • The Satanic Temple stands against pretty much everything Trump and his cultists stand for, as well as the big money Democrat establishment.

        Definitely not ancoms.

      • Monkey With A Shell
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I forget there are two distinct terms for very different orgs, just more a whimsical thought of some goth cathedral and black sacraments thing.

  • downpunxx
    link
    fedilink
    751 year ago

    the fact this isn’t front page photo in every newspaper in the country tells you precisely how much the media wants the horserace, and not the best outcome for democracy. the fact trump keeps saying there’s “88,000” missing illegal aliens during bidens admin so he can keep repeating the number 88 over and over and over again, and THAT is not front page news how the presumptive Republican nominee for President is coding neo nazi slogans into his speeches says everything about how much the media wants the horserace, and not the best outcome for the democracy,

    there are some righteous journalists, there are some righteous media outlets, but they are too few and far between to drown out the incessant “both side” fucking nonsense which will see fascists come to power, and end their freedom of the press. the owners, and shareholders of these media outlets trade on the immediate eyeballs they can leverage into short advertising revenue

    once the fascists take power and start curtailing these media companies rights to free press, they’ll sell out, or simply abandon them, to go hide behind their walled communities, safe from the ruin they will have facilitated in the ruination our best effort egalitarian secular democracy

    and so it goes

    • It’s pretty interesting how you somehow turned this into a both sides hyperbole.

      So you go on this rant about how mainstream media has assisted the slide into fascism, how Democrats will be the savior or free speech and ethical journalism.

      I seem to have missed what the DNC have done to fight back against this slide into fascism for the past 50 years. In fact they actively helped Trump get elected because he’d be easier to beat.

      Can you explain what Democratic leaderships plan is to right the list and get this country functioning again?

      • Cethin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        And here you come, saying they are both bad and we shouldn’t concentrate on Trump and instead “what about the democrats!”

      • @TachyonTele@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        14
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        How do you mentally take rage about the current state of journalism actively ignoring and encouraging Republicans bad behavior to mean “both sides”?

    • @FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      141 year ago

      TBH the less I hear about Trump aside from his prison sentence, the better. He’s not POTUS, there are real issues to talk about.

    • @flerp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      What media companies are you talking about? You mention there are some righteous ones but they’re too few and far between. All of the other ones are owned by like 5 right wing billionaires. Those few and far between ones are all we have.

  • @spujb@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    531 year ago

    the reporting on this could be better which sucks because it’s obvious it’s going to be memeified for months now

    was this actually a church sponsored event or was it just being hosted in the building as a venue?

    not coming at this with any assumptions or narratives i just wish there was more reliable original data than some twitter links i can’t look at without an account :/

      • @spujb@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        ugh bless you thanks so much

        edit, my take: wow that pastor seems like an upstanding guy and i would be nervous for his decision if i didn’t have hindsight and see it played out in a way that clearly only showed his guest’s hypocrisy.

      • Shadehawk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        It’s still pretty damned telling no black people came to their own church to hear him talk.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          131 year ago

          He said his parishioners literally laughed in his face when he asked them to come.

  • @Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1821 year ago

    Either it was all white people, or the white people and black people wouldn’t sit together. I don’t know which is worse.

    • @octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The normal parishioners wouldn’t come because of the Trump attendance so his faithful filled out the crowd (meaning, were the entire crowd) to help feed his misrepresentation of the event. The church was so full. So full. And everyone there loved me, I can tell you that.

      (Not a quote, just a likely facsimile.)

      Regardless, I’m white and I would refuse to sit among a crowd of carpetbagging Trumpers who showed up to displace me from my own church (if I went to church), I sure wouldn’t do so if I were black.

    • finley
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1851 year ago

      The worse one is when black folx can’t even get into their own church because a flock of white fascists took it over.

      • @mean_bean279@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        971 year ago

        If I recall from the articles about this event. The pastor, who is black, invited Trump. In a funny twist as well, the former mayor of Detroit (also black) was there to speak about how great Trump is. Which is fine, except that Trump pardoned him at the end of his presidency because the man was convicted and guilty of: Obstruction of justice (x2), assault of a police officer, racketeering, tax evasion, extortion, mail fraud.

        However even at the event that Kilpatrick was attending with Trump, while singing his praises, didn’t endorse him.

        • finley
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Leave it to a religious leader and the Mayor of Ballmer to overlook the needs of their audience by pandering to fascists…

          When has it been any different?

        • Maeve
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          A lot of anti-abortion black people (single issue voters) and wealthy capitalist/Democrats are the party of Dr King voters support him. The venn diagram overlap would be money.

  • @Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    Well, I can see many people in there who are not perfect representatives of the Arian Race (people whose hair is not blond enough or whose eyes are brown rather than blue), so they should be counted as black, thus making this a mixed race audience, most of which are black.

    /s

  • lurch (he/him)
    link
    fedilink
    491 year ago

    I’m doubt the church is real, because I got no reports of Trump instantly burning to ash the moment he set foot in it.

      • @wieson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        91 year ago

        So you want god to do the work, that you’re supposed to do? Do we live in a democracy or a theocracy?

        • @Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          If the USA is a country that is a democracy, can be answered only by a tentative yes for now. There are too many things wrong with the voting system and disenfranchisement and systemic failures around court appointments for a definitive yes.

          Apart from that, we live in a world where gods don’t exist, but not everyone agrees on that.

        • TheLowestStone
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          Did you reply to the wrong person? Your response to my comment implying that God doesn’t exist makes no sense.

          • @frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            The implication of GP is that it’s our job to turn Trump to ash (and I think that’s the intended interpretation).

          • @wieson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            It’s meant for both of these statements. Do we expect god to turn trump into ash or is it our job to build a good society?

            • @Asafum@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              61 year ago

              “God helps those who help themselves”

              “God works through us”

              “God chooses imperfect vessels.”

              Sorry officer it wasn’t me who threw gasoline on Trump and lit him on fire. God just works in mysterious ways, ya know?

              • @AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                3
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                "God gave me a high powered sniper crossbow for a reason, officer. I just made sure His Will was done by executing 5 obviously criminal SCOTUS “justices.”