The prehistoric megalithic structure in England has been targeted by activists spraying orange powder paint, social media footage showed.

Environmental protesters sprayed paint on Stonehenge on Wednesday, with footage showing an orange powder covering some of the stones.

Two protesters dressed in white were seen running towards two of the megaliths, spraying paint, as another person attempted to stop them, in footage released by Just Stop Oil, an environmental activist group focused on the issue of human-caused climate change.

  • mechoman444
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    All these idiots make me want to do is go dump crude oil into the ocean just to spite them!

    (Sarcasm kind of.)

  • @[email protected]
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    I hate this kind of idiot shit, how do they think this will help their cause? Vandalising a fucking historical monument that does not affect in any way shape or form the environment will just hurt their cause!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      A bunch of old ass rocks that you have to pay money to look at. I hope all that ancient ass shit goes away at some point and humans can look forward.

  • Jin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 year ago

    I can’t simple not see any logic reason in what they are doing…

    Might as well paint a toilet orange at the local library and say it’s for the environment.

    Probably requires harsh cleaning and that goes into the ground…

    • miss phant
      link
      fedilink
      English
      201 year ago

      Probably requires harsh cleaning and that goes into the ground…

      It’s cornstarch, it requires water (rain).

      • Jin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        My cornstarch isn’t orange by default…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 year ago

          The difficulty of adding orange food coloring to cornstarch is an insurmountable chemical process.

      • Jin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Ah! similar to people that wants cloud on social.

          • Jin
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Slightly, but basically the same thing 🤣

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      I’m all for their cause but they’ve been going about it the wrong way every single time. They do nothing but piss the general public off. The very people you actually need to get on your side.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 year ago

        When they block oil terminals, spray paint car dealerships of the heaviest polluters or set themselves on fire the news doesnt cover it so no one will even know, while this actually works.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Hehe, I see what you did there.

        MLK on climate change (probably):

        […]that [humanities] great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the [oil company] or the [billionaire] but the white moderate, who is more devoted to ‘order’ than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: ‘I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action’; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises [climate aware] to wait for a ‘more convenient season.’

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So… they deface a wonder of the world? WTF did Stonehenge ever do to these weirdos?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    371 year ago

    I still subscribe to the theory that these people are hired actors from Big Oil. They are experts at being unlikable and naturally pushes me towards the opposing side. It sucks.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I remember hearing claims that this was the case. I have no idea how true that is, but I would be 0% surprised if it was.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        Don’t worry, it’s not like I’m yielding. The point is that I find them to be detractors rather than attractors to join our common goal of not eliminating ourselves.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      genuinely i used to subscribe to the same theory

      and then it switched. i think they’re here genuinely. not even sure what happened to change my mind. your mileage may vary? but i get where you are coming from.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Just be skeptical about it from both perspectives.

        Bad actors do exist but they’re not to blame for everything despite almost any organization or movement these days attempting to scapegoat any poor publicity they experience as bad actors.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    The most effective method of protesting would be to find a way to get the masses to turn against the lawmakers in such a way that they convince the lawmakers to solve the problem that the protest is focused against.

    But most of these protests just piss off the masses. They run their day with traffic, they destroy heritage sites that people care about, and while they do get in the news and get some publicity, people’s memory is quite negative. And there are zero focus on anybody who could actually change the situation.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    841 year ago

    The amount of knee jerk rage I’ve seen over paint whenever one of these incidents happens. Its paint. It comes off. Its an extremely effective strategy to get attention while causing little to no damage.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      891 year ago

      In this case it’s actually dyed corn starch so this would literally wash off from the first rain. And yea, this actually gets attention, when they spray painted car dealerships of some of the heaviest polluters, protested oil companies and when a guy set himself on fire to protest climate change it gets almost no coverage.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 year ago

      i feel like druids, if forced to pick a side, might be on the side favoring protecting nature :)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    801 year ago

    Ffs just blow up a pipeline or sabotage parts of their infrastructure or follow the higher ups home and deface their homes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Or go sabotage a monument in Saudi-Arabia, they produce more oil than anyone.

      Throwing orange corn starch on the Black Stone in Mecca would be amazing press.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        They won’t do that. That would involve being killed. There is a reason why Peta throws red paint on old ladies wearing fur and not on biker gangs wearing leather.

        The very worst thing the UK government is going to do is throw them in jail for a few months, maybe a small fine.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Fucking so sorry my second language isn’t up to par to your standards.

          What’s the right term here, “a proper naughty twat?”

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              I can get upset when instead of correcting me in the first comment, you mocked me.

              Assuming everyone’s aware of the US/UK law and their nomenclature is too much sniffing of your on farts.

              Or is it flatulence. Toots?

              Oh and lastly, the person I replied to, listed random crimes/felonies, and didn’t specify the country those crimes/felonies should be done.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          151 year ago

          Stalking is.

          Who cares? I’m sure the people who trying to protest without becoming felons. What is this take…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            Following someone once is not stalking. For stalking there has to be a persistent pattern. Or else women would be able to get stalkers arrested a lot more often instead of being killed by them.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              121 year ago

              Fucking thank you for the nitpicking. I’m sure you can deduct where people live if you followed them somewhere once.

              Christ almighty the thickness.

              Encouraging people to do crimes IRL, while posting on the internet anonymously, sitting on your fat ass consuming resources that accelerate climate change.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 year ago

                How do the boots and assholes of the Uber wealthy taste btw? From the way you are munchin down I would guess pretty good but I would like to know your first hand knowledge.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  101 year ago

                  Explain the correlation between you not understanding what a protest is and me supposedly “munching boots”.

                  Sit the fuck back down, basement-dweller, and enjoy people doing the hard work of resisting the status quo for you.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Environmental protesters sprayed paint on Stonehenge on Wednesday, with footage showing an orange powder covering some of the stones.

    Two protesters dressed in white were seen running towards two of the megaliths and spraying paint, as another person attempted to stop them, in footage released by Just Stop Oil, an environmental activist group focused on the issue of human-caused climate change.

    The prehistoric structure dates back to somewhere between 3100 BC and 1600 BC, according to archaeologists.

    Just Stop Oil has drawn criticism for targeting public treasures in the past, including the vandalism of Van Gogh’s Sunflowers with tomato soup in a publicity stunt at London’s National Gallery in 2022.

    Less than a year later, two protesters from the group disrupted play during the Wimbledon Tennis Championships, running onto the court throwing confetti from a picture-puzzle box featuring an image of Wimbledon’s famed Center Court.

    On the eve of that tournament, celebrities including Richard Curtis and Emma Thompson had called on Wimbledon to end its partnership with Barclays Bank over the institution’s multibillion-dollar support for fossil fuel projects.


    The original article contains 161 words, the summary contains 161 words. Saved 0%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • ASeriesOfPoorChoices
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      until they did.

      There’s an exact replica in Esperance, Australia.

      Why? Good question. Good question.

      Check out Bill Bailey’s Australian Adventure, episode 1. It’s on Channel4.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    991 year ago

    Yeah those people who built that place definitely screwed up the environment. This will show them. Let’s dig up their graves and piss on them to show the world we mean business.

    Or maybe let’s not screw up historical sites and go after big business and the ones actually destroying the environment.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      It worked! You’re commenting on it! It worked! It means we should do some more of this…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      451 year ago

      I hate it too. But you’re hearing about it and its here on Lemmy. So its working. Idk if bad rep is what they want. They should be trashing the industry buildings and business headquarters of the most polluting companies. They’re getting arrested anyway and at least then they’d look like Captain Planet.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        It’s not “working”, people are not going to change their purchasing or lifestyle choices based on this.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        231 year ago

        They have spray painted those HQs as well, the news just doesn’t cover it much. So far the only way to raise awerness has been to do stuff like this. Also they intentionally haven’t damaged anything historic so this works with no issue, they know what they are doing.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          141 year ago

          It’s like that internet law. The quickest way to the correct answer is to confidently assert an incorrect answer. Maybe the quickest way to getting noticed is whatever will entice the masses to “correct” your actions?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        381 year ago

        Is it working though? Does discussion of what absolute dipshits they are further the cause? I bet I’d hear about it if they bombed a refinery, but that takes some pretty serious commitment.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          131 year ago

          “Man, these people are dipshits”, “climate change is a problem though”

          That’s an overall positive discussion that wouldn’t have happened otherwise.

          So these people are sacrificing their image for discourse about climate change.

          • Todd Bonzalez
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            I think they’re also sacrificing the image of climate change activism.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              51 year ago

              Climate-change activism shouldn’t be a thing. Let’s not get comfortable with it existing, otherwise it will become constant background noise.

          • Saik0
            link
            fedilink
            English
            91 year ago

            Well you’re missing the other half of the sentence that’s implied…

            “These people are dipshits… I don’t want to be associated with them. How the fuck can I help the planet without being associated with these morons.”… It’s actually quite limiting.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 year ago

              There are so many other people preventing climate change that are not trowing stuff at art. You can join them. If a little group of people doing non violent/non destructive behavior is already preventing you from acting to protect our planet. Then you where never interested in protecting it to begin with.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              8
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’d call that a net-positive.

              Also, disagree that they’re morons. Their methods are rather clever and well-thought out. Unlike some or the mouth-breathers here.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Yeah as a result of this stunt, I googled the term “climate change” and holy shit! Why hasn’t I heard of this!

        So glad they raised my awareness of climate change, which I hadn’t heard of before.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          Amazingly missed the point. This is for the deniers and for all the inaction and half-assed attempts at fixing the problem only to bend to corporate interests. This is shows organization in a group and the means to get things done. What do you think the next steps are if these actions dont beget any changes?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Do you really think any deniers are now convinced?

            Over a century of data pouring in but this act will be what convinces them?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  31 year ago

                  The Les Grossman act just made you lose any credibility you might have had. I see people being activists, even if the method is questionable. They are working, as we are all here reading about it. Then you come in with some snide ass comment and vitriol. I see no ignorance on my part. I hope you’re paper does double the work that my toddler is for the climate and wish you best of luck.