Well Trump is a sex offender so I agree it’s inapropriate to have any unsupervised interaction with other women
There would be a moderator.
If it’s like the CNN moderators, it’ll be 💩💩💩
They’ll need a spray bottle or a rolled news paper to make sure they can keep Trump away from Kamala
Yeah a rolled up newspaper might not cut it. Didn’t Stormy spank him with a magazine?
Convicted felon won’t debate his prosecutor
A prosecutor. Not specifically his. But he has so many they all kinda blend together.
Oh, she would’ve prosecuted him on that stage.
Brave Sir Donald ran away.
Bravely ran away away.
When danger reared it’s ugly head,
He bravely turned his tail and fled.
Yes, brave Sir Donald turned about
And gallantly he chickened out.
Gingerly taking to his feet,
He beat a very brave retreat.
Bravest of the brave, Sir Donald!
Brave Sir Donald, indeed.
Sir?
You…
You get the joke, right?
I’d say in this very specific context, it’s appropriate.
I think its Monty Python but not 100%
Yup. Monty Python and the Holy Grail to be precise.
Remind me again, was Sir Donald the one that planned the wooden rabbit?
in Monty Python and the Holy Grail, it was the “scientifically leaned” Sir Bedevere (Terry Jones)
Coulda fooled me, given the general quality of trumps planning and organization skills.
…which is how we know the world to be banana shaped.
Great, I had plans this evening…
It’s only a bloody model.
Alright, I’m just gonna say it… your mother was a hamster, and your father smelled of elderberry.
Should have replaced “danger reared its ugly head” with. “logic needed to be said”
i agree it would be inappropriate
why would a politician debate with a convicted felon
Coward, pedophile, felon, traitor.
Camera.
Man.
Action!
Hotel?
Foxtrot.
Donnie doesn’t want to debate?
Running scared
Paywall
Damn. I lost that bet.
I thought it’d take longer than this. Mostly for trump to figure out which words to use. he has trouble with multi-syllabic words.
I would love for them to meet on stage and Kamala runs up and grabs trump.
Trump flips out “wh…what are you doing Kamala?!”
Kamala scoffs “pfft, I’m grabbing them by the PUSSY, you dipshit”
I read Trump’s line as “step bro”
“Help, I’m stuck in a cult of my own incompetence, step bro.”
UwU just isn’t the same with trump’s sphinctoral mouth…gross
Lmao
Wh…what are you doing step prez?!
I mean, I guess Vice president is the step-equivalent of President.
If it was any other, normal country, the debate schedule would not be based on whether someone wants to show up or not.
If a canditate doesn’t show up, the other candidate gets to talk about their campaign.
In a normal country an insurrectionist and rapist would not be a candidate, let alone in the top two. We are already well beyond rational thinking about any of this.
The US is bizarro world in so many aspects. Political Supreme Court appointees that are appointed for life (!), two party system, the electoral college, the absurdly long election cycles…
The fact that our election is held on one day and that day happens to be a Tuesday. 😡
Come on now we can’t have the poors voting now can we??
How are we supposed to keep our stranglehold on
wealththe country if we allowed the poors to have their say!?
Political Supreme Court appointees that are appointed for life (!),
Judges are appointed for life, so they can be impartial and don’t need to worry about who won’t hire them after their term ends if they made unfavorable decisions.
the absurdly long election cycles…
4 years is absurdly long to you? Getting things done in politics takes time. How long should the cycle be in your opinion?
Judges are appointed for life, so they can be impartial and don’t need to worry about who won’t hire them after their term ends if they made unfavorable decisions.
Brother I’m not talking about letting the new president fire them at will, I’m talking about term limits and retirement ages.
4 years is absurdly long to you?
This one is maybe on me since my word choice was possibly ambiguous, but I was referring to the campaign cycle - not the length of the term.
Ok, then we agree on all points except term limits for judges. Forced retirement is fine by me, but yanking them out of office before they retire has the drawback I mentioned before.
Term limits in general have lots of drawbacks that people seem to constantly ignore
4 years is crazy long. That means they start campaigning as soon as they enter office.
The “political” before “Supreme Court apointees” implies a lack of impartiality.
“Election cycle” and “term of office” aren’t synonymous.
The US supreme court judges are appointed by politicians: They are political appointees. In a lot of other countries supreme court judges are selected by a non-political committee, like every other non-political appointee.
In a lot of other countries supreme court judges are selected by a non-political committee
My worldwide knowledge of this is limited. In Germany, each of the two ‘houses’ of parliament (Bundestag and Bundesrat) elect one half of the ‘Supreme Court’’s (Bundesverfassungsgericht) members (judges and other staff).
The fact that the first lady does speeches and the presidents family is in the spotlight at all. (Rather dynastic for a democracy)
The well-documented cowardice of this geriatric and demented rapist insurrectionist.
deleted by creator
because he is too old to debate with Harris
Bock Bock
Coward? Or not enough fake news collected … yet?
